MLSNext watered down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have Achilles 2011s won a single game this year? Love the chest thumping though.

They beat The New York Red Bulls 3-2 a month ago.

because RBNY didn't want to travel to play them, so they sent a second team from a lower age

They beat The NY Red Bulls 3-2.

Spin it any way you like.

Okay, here’s another spin. Did Achilles play their 3-4 bio-band 2010s with their 2011s against the 2012 RBNYs?? lol

Spin it any way you like. Achilles won 3-2.

Sooo, yes. lol

Achilles best two teams this year: West Virginia and RBNY. Okay. Lol

Red Bulls only lost to two teams. And Achilles was one of them.

You do know you're bragging about a 2011 beating a 2012?

No bragging. just facts. how did your son's team do vs. NYRB?

The facts are that NYRB didn't take Achilles seriously enough to bring their 2011s so they brought a team a year younger

I'm just looking at the schedule. I see a win for Achilles. And here's how you know I'm not bragging. My son doesn't play for Achilles. My son's team lost to Red Bulls. Twice. Congrats Achilles 2011s. Nice win vs. Red Bulls this seaon.

So you're trying to ignore the fact that Achilles 2011s squeezed out a 3:2 win versus a 2012 team with Achilles using three 2010's?

I'm just enjoying that anything positive about Achilles hurts you so much.

A win is a win. And I don't know whether any of things you say are true or how you think you know them. It would take you having a pretty extensive knowledge of the rosters of two teams you're not a part of.

I see a U14 win by Achilles against New York Red Bulls. Fact. Kudos to those kids.

So yes, you're ignoring the facts and just looking at the result 😂

Tell us again about your son not even making Achilles FC as the catalyst for your non-stop hate on pre and teen boys in the first instance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have Achilles 2011s won a single game this year? Love the chest thumping though.

They beat The New York Red Bulls 3-2 a month ago.

because RBNY didn't want to travel to play them, so they sent a second team from a lower age

They beat The NY Red Bulls 3-2.

Spin it any way you like.

Okay, here’s another spin. Did Achilles play their 3-4 bio-band 2010s with their 2011s against the 2012 RBNYs?? lol

Spin it any way you like. Achilles won 3-2.

Sooo, yes. lol

Achilles best two teams this year: West Virginia and RBNY. Okay. Lol

Red Bulls only lost to two teams. And Achilles was one of them.

You do know you're bragging about a 2011 beating a 2012?

No bragging. just facts. how did your son's team do vs. NYRB?

The facts are that NYRB didn't take Achilles seriously enough to bring their 2011s so they brought a team a year younger

I'm just looking at the schedule. I see a win for Achilles. And here's how you know I'm not bragging. My son doesn't play for Achilles. My son's team lost to Red Bulls. Twice. Congrats Achilles 2011s. Nice win vs. Red Bulls this seaon.

So you're trying to ignore the fact that Achilles 2011s squeezed out a 3:2 win versus a 2012 team with Achilles using three 2010's?

I'm just enjoying that anything positive about Achilles hurts you so much.

A win is a win. And I don't know whether any of things you say are true or how you think you know them. It would take you having a pretty extensive knowledge of the rosters of two teams you're not a part of.

I see a U14 win by Achilles against New York Red Bulls. Fact. Kudos to those kids.

So yes, you're ignoring the facts and just looking at the result 😂

Those aren't "facts" my friend. The score is a fact. The other things are just things you're saying. You're laughing emoji doesn't hide your sadness.

The NYRB 2012's didn't play the Achilles 2011s is your sworn testimony?
Achilles doesn't have 3 biobanded 2010's on their 2011s is also your testimony under oath?

Oh my. How long before you switch to "the coaches are abusive"? I have no idea. I know the score. And, I know you have an unhealthy obsession. How do you know the ages of the kids on the two teams?

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 team beat the NYRB U14 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025.

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 with older biobanded kids beat the NYRB U13 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025

Then lost their next four games 0:6 and 1:9 and 1:5 and 0:8

Again, the ages of the kids are not facts. Tt is merely your speculation based on scores, I assume. There's no way for you to know the players' ages. The fact is, you're on an anonymous message board trying to drag down a club and the kids that play for it, and you've done it over years. Does it make you feel better? 3-2 Achilles.

Seems they're going after you and your white lies, not the kids

I'm not sure how anything I've said could be considered a lie. Achilles U14 beat Red Bulls U14 3-2. I do NOT know the ages of the kids. My son doesn't play for either team. Same with the poster who hates Achilles. I'm also not bragging. As if that's even possible on an anonymous message board. I'm wondering why Achilles hater thinks he does know the ages of the kids and why he cares so much.

The lie is, Achilles U14 beat the Red Bulls U14s

That's what it says on the schedule.

The schedule also says the NYRB U13 beat Achilles U13 when it was in fact the Red Bulls U12's

You think anyone dumb enough is buying what you're selling that Philly Union and DC United U14's plus every one else destroyed Achilles but Achilles beat NYRB?

Beat them 3-2 according to MLS. Doesn’t say anything about a different age group. Looks like you are making all of this up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have Achilles 2011s won a single game this year? Love the chest thumping though.

They beat The New York Red Bulls 3-2 a month ago.

because RBNY didn't want to travel to play them, so they sent a second team from a lower age

They beat The NY Red Bulls 3-2.

Spin it any way you like.

Okay, here’s another spin. Did Achilles play their 3-4 bio-band 2010s with their 2011s against the 2012 RBNYs?? lol

Spin it any way you like. Achilles won 3-2.

Sooo, yes. lol

Achilles best two teams this year: West Virginia and RBNY. Okay. Lol

Red Bulls only lost to two teams. And Achilles was one of them.

You do know you're bragging about a 2011 beating a 2012?

No bragging. just facts. how did your son's team do vs. NYRB?

The facts are that NYRB didn't take Achilles seriously enough to bring their 2011s so they brought a team a year younger

I'm just looking at the schedule. I see a win for Achilles. And here's how you know I'm not bragging. My son doesn't play for Achilles. My son's team lost to Red Bulls. Twice. Congrats Achilles 2011s. Nice win vs. Red Bulls this seaon.

So you're trying to ignore the fact that Achilles 2011s squeezed out a 3:2 win versus a 2012 team with Achilles using three 2010's?

I'm just enjoying that anything positive about Achilles hurts you so much.

A win is a win. And I don't know whether any of things you say are true or how you think you know them. It would take you having a pretty extensive knowledge of the rosters of two teams you're not a part of.

I see a U14 win by Achilles against New York Red Bulls. Fact. Kudos to those kids.

So yes, you're ignoring the facts and just looking at the result 😂

Those aren't "facts" my friend. The score is a fact. The other things are just things you're saying. You're laughing emoji doesn't hide your sadness.

The NYRB 2012's didn't play the Achilles 2011s is your sworn testimony?
Achilles doesn't have 3 biobanded 2010's on their 2011s is also your testimony under oath?

They actually have 5 biobanded 2010s

“Facts” according to troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have Achilles 2011s won a single game this year? Love the chest thumping though.

They beat The New York Red Bulls 3-2 a month ago.

because RBNY didn't want to travel to play them, so they sent a second team from a lower age

They beat The NY Red Bulls 3-2.

Spin it any way you like.

Okay, here’s another spin. Did Achilles play their 3-4 bio-band 2010s with their 2011s against the 2012 RBNYs?? lol

Spin it any way you like. Achilles won 3-2.

Sooo, yes. lol

Achilles best two teams this year: West Virginia and RBNY. Okay. Lol

Red Bulls only lost to two teams. And Achilles was one of them.

You do know you're bragging about a 2011 beating a 2012?

No bragging. just facts. how did your son's team do vs. NYRB?

The facts are that NYRB didn't take Achilles seriously enough to bring their 2011s so they brought a team a year younger

I'm just looking at the schedule. I see a win for Achilles. And here's how you know I'm not bragging. My son doesn't play for Achilles. My son's team lost to Red Bulls. Twice. Congrats Achilles 2011s. Nice win vs. Red Bulls this seaon.

So you're trying to ignore the fact that Achilles 2011s squeezed out a 3:2 win versus a 2012 team with Achilles using three 2010's?

I'm just enjoying that anything positive about Achilles hurts you so much.

A win is a win. And I don't know whether any of things you say are true or how you think you know them. It would take you having a pretty extensive knowledge of the rosters of two teams you're not a part of.

I see a U14 win by Achilles against New York Red Bulls. Fact. Kudos to those kids.

So yes, you're ignoring the facts and just looking at the result 😂

Those aren't "facts" my friend. The score is a fact. The other things are just things you're saying. You're laughing emoji doesn't hide your sadness.

The NYRB 2012's didn't play the Achilles 2011s is your sworn testimony?
Achilles doesn't have 3 biobanded 2010's on their 2011s is also your testimony under oath?

Oh my. How long before you switch to "the coaches are abusive"? I have no idea. I know the score. And, I know you have an unhealthy obsession. How do you know the ages of the kids on the two teams?

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 team beat the NYRB U14 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025.

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 with older biobanded kids beat the NYRB U13 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025

Then lost their next four games 0:6 and 1:9 and 1:5 and 0:8

What’s worse, your son didn’t even make the team during thE COVID years, yet here you are, years later trashing the 2011’s.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have Achilles 2011s won a single game this year? Love the chest thumping though.

They beat The New York Red Bulls 3-2 a month ago.

because RBNY didn't want to travel to play them, so they sent a second team from a lower age

They beat The NY Red Bulls 3-2.

Spin it any way you like.

Okay, here’s another spin. Did Achilles play their 3-4 bio-band 2010s with their 2011s against the 2012 RBNYs?? lol

Spin it any way you like. Achilles won 3-2.

Sooo, yes. lol

Achilles best two teams this year: West Virginia and RBNY. Okay. Lol

Red Bulls only lost to two teams. And Achilles was one of them.

You do know you're bragging about a 2011 beating a 2012?

No bragging. just facts. how did your son's team do vs. NYRB?

The facts are that NYRB didn't take Achilles seriously enough to bring their 2011s so they brought a team a year younger

I'm just looking at the schedule. I see a win for Achilles. And here's how you know I'm not bragging. My son doesn't play for Achilles. My son's team lost to Red Bulls. Twice. Congrats Achilles 2011s. Nice win vs. Red Bulls this seaon.

So you're trying to ignore the fact that Achilles 2011s squeezed out a 3:2 win versus a 2012 team with Achilles using three 2010's?

I'm just enjoying that anything positive about Achilles hurts you so much.

A win is a win. And I don't know whether any of things you say are true or how you think you know them. It would take you having a pretty extensive knowledge of the rosters of two teams you're not a part of.

I see a U14 win by Achilles against New York Red Bulls. Fact. Kudos to those kids.

So yes, you're ignoring the facts and just looking at the result 😂

Those aren't "facts" my friend. The score is a fact. The other things are just things you're saying. You're laughing emoji doesn't hide your sadness.

The NYRB 2012's didn't play the Achilles 2011s is your sworn testimony?
Achilles doesn't have 3 biobanded 2010's on their 2011s is also your testimony under oath?

Oh my. How long before you switch to "the coaches are abusive"? I have no idea. I know the score. And, I know you have an unhealthy obsession. How do you know the ages of the kids on the two teams?

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 team beat the NYRB U14 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025.

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 with older biobanded kids beat the NYRB U13 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025

Then lost their next four games 0:6 and 1:9 and 1:5 and 0:8

Again, the ages of the kids are not facts. Tt is merely your speculation based on scores, I assume. There's no way for you to know the players' ages. The fact is, you're on an anonymous message board trying to drag down a club and the kids that play for it, and you've done it over years. Does it make you feel better? 3-2 Achilles.

Seems they're going after you and your white lies, not the kids

I'm not sure how anything I've said could be considered a lie. Achilles U14 beat Red Bulls U14 3-2. I do NOT know the ages of the kids. My son doesn't play for either team. Same with the poster who hates Achilles. I'm also not bragging. As if that's even possible on an anonymous message board. I'm wondering why Achilles hater thinks he does know the ages of the kids and why he cares so much.

The lie is, Achilles U14 beat the Red Bulls U14s

They care because they thought their son was headed to the 2011 MLSNext Achilles FC team but didn’t make the cut. It’s been war against Achilles since.

Goodness, that’s so pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Same with the poster who hates Achilles.

We are more than one

Maybe the two of you can save some money on therapy. Group session?

Haha, right? Hell hath no fury like a parent being scorned from Achilles FC.

Think about that for just a moment. Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

[list]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have Achilles 2011s won a single game this year? Love the chest thumping though.

They beat The New York Red Bulls 3-2 a month ago.

because RBNY didn't want to travel to play them, so they sent a second team from a lower age

They beat The NY Red Bulls 3-2.

Spin it any way you like.

Okay, here’s another spin. Did Achilles play their 3-4 bio-band 2010s with their 2011s against the 2012 RBNYs?? lol

Spin it any way you like. Achilles won 3-2.

Sooo, yes. lol

Achilles best two teams this year: West Virginia and RBNY. Okay. Lol

Red Bulls only lost to two teams. And Achilles was one of them.

You do know you're bragging about a 2011 beating a 2012?

No bragging. just facts. how did your son's team do vs. NYRB?

The facts are that NYRB didn't take Achilles seriously enough to bring their 2011s so they brought a team a year younger

I'm just looking at the schedule. I see a win for Achilles. And here's how you know I'm not bragging. My son doesn't play for Achilles. My son's team lost to Red Bulls. Twice. Congrats Achilles 2011s. Nice win vs. Red Bulls this seaon.

So you're trying to ignore the fact that Achilles 2011s squeezed out a 3:2 win versus a 2012 team with Achilles using three 2010's?

I'm just enjoying that anything positive about Achilles hurts you so much.

A win is a win. And I don't know whether any of things you say are true or how you think you know them. It would take you having a pretty extensive knowledge of the rosters of two teams you're not a part of.

I see a U14 win by Achilles against New York Red Bulls. Fact. Kudos to those kids.

So yes, you're ignoring the facts and just looking at the result 😂

Those aren't "facts" my friend. The score is a fact. The other things are just things you're saying. You're laughing emoji doesn't hide your sadness.

The NYRB 2012's didn't play the Achilles 2011s is your sworn testimony?
Achilles doesn't have 3 biobanded 2010's on their 2011s is also your testimony under oath?

Oh my. How long before you switch to "the coaches are abusive"? I have no idea. I know the score. And, I know you have an unhealthy obsession. How do you know the ages of the kids on the two teams?

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 team beat the NYRB U14 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025.

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 with older biobanded kids beat the NYRB U13 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025

Then lost their next four games 0:6 and 1:9 and 1:5 and 0:8

Again, the ages of the kids are not facts. Tt is merely your speculation based on scores, I assume. There's no way for you to know the players' ages. The fact is, you're on an anonymous message board trying to drag down a club and the kids that play for it, and you've done it over years. Does it make you feel better? 3-2 Achilles.

Seems they're going after you and your white lies, not the kids

I'm not sure how anything I've said could be considered a lie. Achilles U14 beat Red Bulls U14 3-2. I do NOT know the ages of the kids. My son doesn't play for either team. Same with the poster who hates Achilles. I'm also not bragging. As if that's even possible on an anonymous message board. I'm wondering why Achilles hater thinks he does know the ages of the kids and why he cares so much.

The lie is, Achilles U14 beat the Red Bulls U14s

That's what it says on the schedule.

The schedule also says the NYRB U13 beat Achilles U13 when it was in fact the Red Bulls U12's

You think anyone dumb enough is buying what you're selling that Philly Union and DC United U14's plus every one else destroyed Achilles but Achilles beat NYRB?

OK, my guy. Now you pretend to know the ages of the kids on 4 teams, in two age groups. I'm not selling anything. Achilles U14s did beat NYRB. I see it right there on the schedule. Must have been a good day for Achilles. But I'd just be speculating. Like you. You don't know how old the players were. And you don't know how the game went. I'm definitely more likely to believe a posted score and age group over the ranting of anonymous poster.

No one said how old players are. They said what teams they were.

They aren't disputing the scores either.

I'm sorry. What? The teams are based on ages (U13, anyone). How could you profess to "know" it was a year younger age-group team without knowing the ages of the kids? The answer is, you don't. You're speculating.

And how could you claim that kids are "bio-banded" for Achilles without knowing the ages of the kids? Again, speculation.

hhhmmmm...
you have a point

There is no way the Red Bulls used their U12's and U13's to play up against the weakest teams in the division
And the only way someone could know that happened is if the NYRB handed out copies of their birth certificates

Weakest teams? Achilles FC U13 ended the season ranked higher than 9 other teams in the Mid-Atlantic and are in the MLSNext Cup single elimination tournament. Not the showcase, the tournament.

https://www.mlssoccer.com/mlsnext/standings/u13/

Troll, be gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have Achilles 2011s won a single game this year? Love the chest thumping though.

They beat The New York Red Bulls 3-2 a month ago.

because RBNY didn't want to travel to play them, so they sent a second team from a lower age

They beat The NY Red Bulls 3-2.

Spin it any way you like.

Okay, here’s another spin. Did Achilles play their 3-4 bio-band 2010s with their 2011s against the 2012 RBNYs?? lol

Spin it any way you like. Achilles won 3-2.

Sooo, yes. lol

Achilles best two teams this year: West Virginia and RBNY. Okay. Lol

Red Bulls only lost to two teams. And Achilles was one of them.

You do know you're bragging about a 2011 beating a 2012?

No bragging. just facts. how did your son's team do vs. NYRB?

The facts are that NYRB didn't take Achilles seriously enough to bring their 2011s so they brought a team a year younger

I'm just looking at the schedule. I see a win for Achilles. And here's how you know I'm not bragging. My son doesn't play for Achilles. My son's team lost to Red Bulls. Twice. Congrats Achilles 2011s. Nice win vs. Red Bulls this seaon.

So you're trying to ignore the fact that Achilles 2011s squeezed out a 3:2 win versus a 2012 team with Achilles using three 2010's?

I'm just enjoying that anything positive about Achilles hurts you so much.

A win is a win. And I don't know whether any of things you say are true or how you think you know them. It would take you having a pretty extensive knowledge of the rosters of two teams you're not a part of.

I see a U14 win by Achilles against New York Red Bulls. Fact. Kudos to those kids.

So yes, you're ignoring the facts and just looking at the result 😂

Those aren't "facts" my friend. The score is a fact. The other things are just things you're saying. You're laughing emoji doesn't hide your sadness.

The NYRB 2012's didn't play the Achilles 2011s is your sworn testimony?
Achilles doesn't have 3 biobanded 2010's on their 2011s is also your testimony under oath?

Oh my. How long before you switch to "the coaches are abusive"? I have no idea. I know the score. And, I know you have an unhealthy obsession. How do you know the ages of the kids on the two teams?

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 team beat the NYRB U14 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025.

Again, the fact is, Achilles U14 with older biobanded kids beat the NYRB U13 team 3-2 on April 6th, 2025

Then lost their next four games 0:6 and 1:9 and 1:5 and 0:8

Again, the ages of the kids are not facts. Tt is merely your speculation based on scores, I assume. There's no way for you to know the players' ages. The fact is, you're on an anonymous message board trying to drag down a club and the kids that play for it, and you've done it over years. Does it make you feel better? 3-2 Achilles.

Seems they're going after you and your white lies, not the kids

I'm not sure how anything I've said could be considered a lie. Achilles U14 beat Red Bulls U14 3-2. I do NOT know the ages of the kids. My son doesn't play for either team. Same with the poster who hates Achilles. I'm also not bragging. As if that's even possible on an anonymous message board. I'm wondering why Achilles hater thinks he does know the ages of the kids and why he cares so much.

The lie is, Achilles U14 beat the Red Bulls U14s

That's what it says on the schedule.

The schedule also says the NYRB U13 beat Achilles U13 when it was in fact the Red Bulls U12's

You think anyone dumb enough is buying what you're selling that Philly Union and DC United U14's plus every one else destroyed Achilles but Achilles beat NYRB?

OK, my guy. Now you pretend to know the ages of the kids on 4 teams, in two age groups. I'm not selling anything. Achilles U14s did beat NYRB. I see it right there on the schedule. Must have been a good day for Achilles. But I'd just be speculating. Like you. You don't know how old the players were. And you don't know how the game went. I'm definitely more likely to believe a posted score and age group over the ranting of anonymous poster.

No one said how old players are. They said what teams they were.

They aren't disputing the scores either.

I'm sorry. What? The teams are based on ages (U13, anyone). How could you profess to "know" it was a year younger age-group team without knowing the ages of the kids? The answer is, you don't. You're speculating.

And how could you claim that kids are "bio-banded" for Achilles without knowing the ages of the kids? Again, speculation.

hhhmmmm...
you have a point

There is no way the Red Bulls used their U12's and U13's to play up against the weakest teams in the division
And the only way someone could know that happened is if the NYRB handed out copies of their birth certificates

Thank you. I'm quite good at this.

And you're wrong, lots of people could know that, if it were true. Even without the birth certificates.

But not you. You don't know anything. I'm still going with the schedule. Nice win Achilles, U14.

Nice win indeed

The only team to be beaten by West Virginia pulls off a major upset of the big bad NY Red Bulls

Yes! You've come around and let go of your anger? I agree. Again, like you, I didn't see the match. But I agree with you. An excellent upset and something to build on.

Your insanity bubble has only room for one

Achilles people are being quiet because they know who they played against

Um, no.

[Anonymous]

oh wow, this turned into something lol

The only reason I even initially challenged the Achilles parent (or is it a coach??) on their victory over RBNY is they were posting winning one particular game as proof their club is not part of what this thread was about, the watering down of MLS Next. When the facts of even that game are known, it's the exact proof that Achilles is watering down MLS Next. Maybe we should differentiate between Tiers 1 and 2. Achilles most definitely should be moved to Tier 2. If the one driving force behind the value of MLS Next is the ability to play the academies regularly, then the academies begin to bail on multiple games because there is no real competition, than what good is MLS Next?

WV should be NCSL. Achilles, PA Classics, probably a few others should be Tier 2. Arlington, Richmond, VDA would fit in well with Tier 1 and immediately improve MLS Next. But we have to be real about some of these clubs or else MLS Next will definitely get watered down to just another league.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:oh wow, this turned into something lol

The only reason I even initially challenged the Achilles parent (or is it a coach??) on their victory over RBNY is they were posting winning one particular game as proof their club is not part of what this thread was about, the watering down of MLS Next. When the facts of even that game are known, it's the exact proof that Achilles is watering down MLS Next. Maybe we should differentiate between Tiers 1 and 2. Achilles most definitely should be moved to Tier 2. If the one driving force behind the value of MLS Next is the ability to play the academies regularly, then the academies begin to bail on multiple games because there is no real competition, than what good is MLS Next?

WV should be NCSL. Achilles, PA Classics, probably a few others should be Tier 2. Arlington, Richmond, VDA would fit in well with Tier 1 and immediately improve MLS Next. But we have to be real about some of these clubs or else MLS Next will definitely get watered down to just another league.

+1

How the heck do they keep WV in Tier 1? How many teams do they have?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh wow, this turned into something lol

The only reason I even initially challenged the Achilles parent (or is it a coach??) on their victory over RBNY is they were posting winning one particular game as proof their club is not part of what this thread was about, the watering down of MLS Next. When the facts of even that game are known, it's the exact proof that Achilles is watering down MLS Next. Maybe we should differentiate between Tiers 1 and 2. Achilles most definitely should be moved to Tier 2. If the one driving force behind the value of MLS Next is the ability to play the academies regularly, then the academies begin to bail on multiple games because there is no real competition, than what good is MLS Next?

WV should be NCSL. Achilles, PA Classics, probably a few others should be Tier 2. Arlington, Richmond, VDA would fit in well with Tier 1 and immediately improve MLS Next. But we have to be real about some of these clubs or else MLS Next will definitely get watered down to just another league.

+1

How the heck do they keep WV in Tier 1? How many teams do they have?

It’s soooo obvious this is the same poster posting and responding to themselves. So pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Achilles 2011 beat Red Bulls 2012 - second team. It was hilarious, the Achilles parents were so happy they beat Red Bulls. Those parents aren't smart enough to realize how this was an insult to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Achilles 2011 beat Red Bulls 2012 - second team. It was hilarious, the Achilles parents were so happy they beat Red Bulls. Those parents aren't smart enough to realize how this was an insult to them.

+1

This isn’t about Achilles being the wrong club for their players, it’s about Achilles not being up to MLS Next Tier 1 quality

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Achilles 2011 beat Red Bulls 2012 - second team. It was hilarious, the Achilles parents were so happy they beat Red Bulls. Those parents aren't smart enough to realize how this was an insult to them.

+1

This isn’t about Achilles being the wrong club for their players, it’s about Achilles not being up to MLS Next Tier 1 quality

Clearly the league doesn't agree. Why do you think they expanded Achilles's age groups this year? Could it be that the league sees a good record of player development? Why, in any case, does it bother you so much that the league disagrees with your assessment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Achilles 2011 beat Red Bulls 2012 - second team. It was hilarious, the Achilles parents were so happy they beat Red Bulls. Those parents aren't smart enough to realize how this was an insult to them.

+1

This isn’t about Achilles being the wrong club for their players, it’s about Achilles not being up to MLS Next Tier 1 quality

What are you going on about? Achilles U13’s made the MLSNext Cup playoffs.