Watch the ESPN documentary.
It wouldn't have never mattered how well the prosecution presented its case, OJ was getting off no matter what because the one black juror said it was going to be payback for Rodney King. I remember when that bombshell was dropped in the ESPN doc. OJ was always going to walk out of there scot free no.matyer what. |
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/norm-macdonald-oj-simpson-death-1235002811/amp/
Norm is trending due to the news of OJ’s passing, and this Rolling Stone article explains why. Best summary of why Norm’s relentless quips was actually an important commentary on not only the man, but also the media frenzy surrounding the trial. Norm was a gem. A courageous gem who never stopped. |
What you have written here has been the most insightful response I have seen on this thread. |
You are both missing the most critical point: The media frenzy around this trial marks a turning point in our society…when the news became entertainment, the media shifted from “just the facts” to a business model that commercialized the news. Infotainment became a thing…and that thing ultimately destroyed reporting by putting a spin on everything to make it juicy. Icymi: The polarization started long before Trump. |
I just want to take issue with the bolded - out of a post I agree with nearly entirely, I do take issue with that sentence because it stereotypes domestic abusers/tyrants as largely being from poor backgrounds. That just isn't true. Domestic abuse crosses all SES and is just as prevalent across them, but it is just not as often arrested and prosecuted in the middle and upper classes as it is among the poor. Nicole & OJ's story was the perfect example of that phenomenon, and there was a country filled with middle class and UMC battered wives and girlfriends who saw themselves in Nicole and for once didn't turn away. But usually, we turn away or minimize and that is why domestic abuse never goes away - because boys across SES all over this country have that model of 'manhood' as their primary experience of being male and how to treat women, and the behavior and cycle of abuse perpetuates. This tribute to Nicole Brown is one of the best things ever written about the case - it says a lot about domestic violence in America, and sadly, everything in this essay is still true and relevant today: In Memory of Nicole Brown Simpson |
If anyone is interested in a very (very) in depth podcast of the OJ Simpson case, check out “You’re Wrong About”. They have like 13 OJ episodes and they actually tapered off and stopped making them once they got to the actual trial part because the podcasters said they just didn’t have it in them anymore to continue it, which disappointed me. But it’s SO in depth in describing Nicole Brown, their relationship, the murder, the aftermath of the murder , and the early stages of the trial. I really enjoyed the deep dive. |
In Memory of Nicole Brown Simpson- really good piece
http://evergreenreview.com/read/in-memory-of-nicole-brown-simpson/ |
He argued parts of the case before the court and signed pleadings. His participation was tangible. I do recall what you're saying about why he was on the team as being true. Don't remember the motivation. |
OJ had a dark past and rough upbringing.
Daily Mail running article about his late father, Jimmy Lee. From the above: The child of a broken home, he grew up on a grim housing project in San Francisco, so poor that he developed rickets and had to wear steel braces on his skinny legs. His father was reportedly a well-known drag queen who later announced he was gay and died from AIDS. |
+1 George Huguely IV comes to mind. |
I don’t think the PP was saying most abusers have traumatic backgrounds. I think they were saying that many men who come from rough backgrounds suppress their issues until they bubble up in unhealthy ways. It’s a problem with men being taught to deal with things internally. |
No she is ignoring that many men with no rough background are abusers. |
And what I'm saying is PP is wrong, and the bolded from what you wrote is the truth of the matter. Many men from ALL backgrounds suppress their issues until they bubble up in unhealthy ways - that is pretty much at the core of toxic masculinity. Many boys never learn to process their emotions in healthy ways, and the grow into men who process their emotions at the expense of a woman's psyche and bodily integrity. And those men come from 'born with a silver spoon' just as often as from inner city low income backgrounds. |
Exactly how would hair dye help a black 6’1 200 lb ex football player with a distinct gait, who’s face was plastered all over America, escape detection? |
Additionally, PP doesn't realize what black men living in very corrupt police districts felt in the 1990s. Every decade we have made more progress on social injustice, but even with all the progress since the civil rights era of the 1960's, in the 1990's, if you were a black man targeted by largely white police forces in corrupt areas, you were essentially assumed to be guilty until proven innocent. Plus, as was shown, the LA police had absolutely no compunction against planting evidence to support their charges. Back then, affluent, large-white communities blamed all their woes on minorities who were often scapegoated to protect white privileged individuals. This is completely aside from whether OJ was guilty or innocent. The fact is that a black man in the 1990's being charged by the LAPD was virtually an open and shut case and the black man was going to be found guilty whether he was or not. Yes, I know that many of you privileged white people cannot fathom how multi-tiered the justice system was against those that were non-white, but it was and anyone who was not white was very pleased to see someone escape from the very prejudicial justice system, even if he was guilty. It gave hope that maybe precedent would be set and would help the many innocent minority suspects from being ground up by the biased and bigoted system. |