The coordinated attack on D.E.I. is a vast right wing conspiracy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them.

Nothing says "Stop Discrimination!" like more discrimination!

[Anonymous]

Right wingers look like a bunch of discriminatory losers on this thread. Post after post of nonsense, and they’ve avoided answering every direct question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

Gee, maybe I wasn't even alive back then.

Yes, let's run the whole world on children being forced to receive retribution for the sins of their fathers. Maybe all those modern day Germans should be sent to jail too because their grandfathers were Nazis. Or maybe all of those modern day Japanese citizens should follow a similar path because their grandfathers slaughter millions across Asian during WW2.

At least you're honest about your true intentions - you flat out admit this isn't about equal opportunities. You want retribution and payback. Nothing like correcting a previous wrong by doing more wrong. Thanks for exposing what DEI really is!

Give us a break. What are you, 3 years old? I’ve seen unqualified men advance above qualified women in the past 5 years. It’s not something that stopped 30, 20, or even 10 years ago.

In the past they didn’t call it anything. They just pretended it didn’t exist for men. But guess what, it still does.

Maybe. But I’ve seen far more women recently than men who are being promoted and who are mid to low quality candidates and vastly inexperienced. lol, you haven’t sat in on a hiring panel in the last ten years, have you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them.

So revenge.

At least you can stop labeling as DEI and just call a spade a spade - you want revenge, or perhaps even vengeance for any contrived slight you come up with next.

Total brainwashing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them.

So revenge.

At least you can stop labeling as DEI and just call a spade a spade - you want revenge, or perhaps even vengeance for any contrived slight you come up with next.

Total brainwashing.

You said revenge. No one else said revenge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

The thing that baffles me is why do these quotas exist? It’s not like there’s a world DEI police. And DEI is fairly unpopular with a wide section of the population so seems odd to embrace it for PR reasons

There actually is. Corporations get rated on their DEI activities and that impacts their ability to get financing.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/blackrock-ceo-slammed-force-behaviors-dei-initiatives.amp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them.

So revenge.

At least you can stop labeling as DEI and just call a spade a spade - you want revenge, or perhaps even vengeance for any contrived slight you come up with next.

Total brainwashing.

You said revenge. No one else said revenge.

"Turnabout is fair play."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them.

So revenge.

At least you can stop labeling as DEI and just call a spade a spade - you want revenge, or perhaps even vengeance for any contrived slight you come up with next.

Total brainwashing.

It’s so cute to see men get upset when they think they’ve been treated the same way they’ve treated women for eons.

At any rate you you haven’t produced any statistics to show that women candidates are doing a poorer job than the mediocre men they bested for the job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them.

So revenge.

At least you can stop labeling as DEI and just call a spade a spade - you want revenge, or perhaps even vengeance for any contrived slight you come up with next.

Total brainwashing.

It’s so cute to see men get upset when they think they’ve been treated the same way they’ve treated women for eons.

At any rate you you haven’t produced any statistics to show that women candidates are doing a poorer job than the mediocre men they bested for the job.

It's hilarious the fact that you're probably a white woman who gets to double dip - white privilege AND benefits from DEI initiatives/institutionalized revenge.

Imagine Germans getting upset if German teenagers got treated the way Nazis treated Jews, as some form of demented justice to get us back to ground zero. Turnabout is fair play!

Maybe Native Americans can mentally justify raping, killing and exterminating white people next. Turnabout is fair play!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where I work, DEI is a bunch of garbage. They keep hiring and promoting based on identity, most often women, and it leads to completely inexperienced staff with gaping holes in backgrounds managing everything. Lol, they just promoted a woman with only 5 years experience right out of grad school to a director level position. Absolute joke when it usually requires 10-15+ years experience, most of which you've at least had multiple years of managing personnel at a middle management level first. Her resume is nothing astounding, yet she's fast tracked to upper manager level positions for God knows why. 100% DEI wokeism garbage at work.

A bunch of mid, unqualified and mediocre women get to benefit these days. It's also funny, because it is often white women too who get the reap the most benefit - they get their white privilege AND can leverage DEI wokeism in their favor by citing something something something about gender.

I call bullsh*t. They had other reasons for promoting that woman. There must be something about her they like. Maybe they just don't like you. You never know what is happening behind the scenes. Signed a COO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where I work, DEI is a bunch of garbage. They keep hiring and promoting based on identity, most often women, and it leads to completely inexperienced staff with gaping holes in backgrounds managing everything. Lol, they just promoted a woman with only 5 years experience right out of grad school to a director level position. Absolute joke when it usually requires 10-15+ years experience, most of which you've at least had multiple years of managing personnel at a middle management level first. Her resume is nothing astounding, yet she's fast tracked to upper manager level positions for God knows why. 100% DEI wokeism garbage at work.

A bunch of mid, unqualified and mediocre women get to benefit these days. It's also funny, because it is often white women too who get the reap the most benefit - they get their white privilege AND can leverage DEI wokeism in their favor by citing something something something about gender.

I call bullsh*t. They had other reasons for promoting that woman. There must be something about her they like. Maybe they just don't like you. You never know what is happening behind the scenes. Signed a COO.

Nope. You just don’t hire someone with only 5 years experience and no experience managing personnel for a number of years into a director level role. It’s a blatant diversity hire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where I work, DEI is a bunch of garbage. They keep hiring and promoting based on identity, most often women, and it leads to completely inexperienced staff with gaping holes in backgrounds managing everything. Lol, they just promoted a woman with only 5 years experience right out of grad school to a director level position. Absolute joke when it usually requires 10-15+ years experience, most of which you've at least had multiple years of managing personnel at a middle management level first. Her resume is nothing astounding, yet she's fast tracked to upper manager level positions for God knows why. 100% DEI wokeism garbage at work.

A bunch of mid, unqualified and mediocre women get to benefit these days. It's also funny, because it is often white women too who get the reap the most benefit - they get their white privilege AND can leverage DEI wokeism in their favor by citing something something something about gender.

I call bullsh*t. They had other reasons for promoting that woman. There must be something about her they like. Maybe they just don't like you. You never know what is happening behind the scenes. Signed a COO.

Now explain Claudine Gay at Harvard. A young marginal scholar chosen to lead one of the most prestigious universities in the country

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them.

So revenge.

At least you can stop labeling as DEI and just call a spade a spade - you want revenge, or perhaps even vengeance for any contrived slight you come up with next.

Total brainwashing.

You said revenge. No one else said revenge.

"Turnabout is fair play."

I wonder how many people saying turnabout is fair play are also surprised by Trump's popularity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is not wrong about the nannies raising the kids…

Why encourage your daughter to go to college then? You don’t need a college degree to be a SAHM.

NP, but so she can work before having kids, after her kids are grown, if her husband dies or leaves her, or wants to homeschool her kids or just be an educated person? Or maybe she’ll never marry or have kids & doesn’t know that yet at 18. I mean, come on.

NP- Totally agree! I worked for 18 years after college before I stayed home with my kids. 18 years of a good salary that you can invest and save lets people have choices. Are people this bad with money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality. DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input. It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality. It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end. It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name. No one is fooled.

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by. But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota.

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen.

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them.

So revenge.

At least you can stop labeling as DEI and just call a spade a spade - you want revenge, or perhaps even vengeance for any contrived slight you come up with next.

Total brainwashing.

You said revenge. No one else said revenge.

"Turnabout is fair play."

I wonder how many people saying turnabout is fair play are also surprised by Trump's popularity.

I know, right?