Not true. Not all schools include this info on profile, including Whitman which recently removed this info |
|
No regrets:
DD is a strong public school student with no hooks, and we did our research on our own. She applied to 3 safety schools (1 rolling admission), 3 target schools, and 3 reach schools (T50 state flagships). DD was accepted to the rolling admission school last fall with a nice scholarship, which took the pressure off. She got into her other safety and target schools with merit aid — and was thrilled to get into 2 of her 3 reach schools. She didn’t get merit aid to her reaches but, fortunately, her AP credits make them doable. My best advice is to set a budget early, use the Net Price Calculators, and apply Early Action whenever possible. |
College admins specialize in regions; they still know. |
Sure, varied interests are nice, and they can show involvement and dedication. Some schools, but not all, may specifically be looking for those well-rounded kids. But there's a sense in college admissions that many schools are now looking for "spiky" kids, who have deep interests in one area and put time and dedication into it. For schools that admit by major, and particularly for "impacted" majors (with limited enrollment) such as CS, I'm guessing they'd prefer seeing students who have spent additional time on CS activities. |
That doesn’t show what you seem to think it does. |
One of the funniest movies. |
no, it really doesn't. Just to those who are obsessed with it. Smart people do their own research and use facts to decide what is the best school for their kid |
Because 99% of those kids would be excellent candidates at most of the T25 schools. However, 95% of them will not get in. Simple numbers. At that point, yes it's a lottery |
Agree,out private use to provide median, highest and lowest gpa for the class, and removed that information this year. Since grades were somewhat deflated, I think it was a mistake. |
|
My kid had a school they loved that did not do ED. So they stretched massively for SCEA. That failed.
The RD only school was a reject as well. So don’t do this. Use your EDs wisely. It’s really the only advantage an unhooked kid has. And don’t ignore the SLACs who know the DMV privates well. My kid hated the idea of being in small town New England at a tiny school with no research. So they lost that as well Luckily kid has one of their targets locked in. But other than that target and 3 safeties, all reject and WL everywhere. Feel kid could have hit one of his high target : low reaches ( the nyu : bc type) if ED1 and ED2 had been strategically used. |
| I regret that I'm reading this thread even though my kids have graduated university. It's like the pleasure of picking a scab - you don't know why you do it and it leaves scars. |
So, what is the point of commenting (or are you OP, starting this thread?)? Are these your regrets? It sounds like your kids just did their thing and are now living with the results of doing so. I'm sure those results are not horrible. My regret is pushing my kid to take Honors Alg 2 as a freshman. It ruined their GPA for Freshman year (B-, D, B-, B-). Could never get around that. And to what end? They are not going to be a STEM major. They could've easily just taken regular Alg 2 and have worked out a B or higher. |
The challenge for parents of younger kids is that the trend of the day will probably change by the time those kids are seniors. When we started thinking about this, kids had to be well-rounded. Then they needed to be pointy, then they needed to be first generation or have great ecs or be able to tell their unique story. Who knows what they'll need to have in 5-7 years. |
This is an important lesson many parents could learn. Do NOT push your kid to take a higher level of a class they struggle with/don't have interest in. The stress of that one class can bring down many class grades and kill your kid's self esteem and GPA. |
+100 |