Well yeah, your other son is doing well financially BECAUSE HE HAS A JOB AND DOESN'T LIVE OFF DADDY. I agree with the PPs, you must be a troll. Nobody can be this dumb, |
|
| . |
| You can do whatever you want, but most people would think you're a real a-hole to do that |
Exactly. Things happen that shake up the balance of what's "fair." My parents left the bulk of their estate to my opioid addicted brother who abused them while they were alive. But in their old world view, their unemployed "son" needed to be provided for. Meanwhile, he got himself a mail order, much younger bride. Their blood grandchildren from his first marriage will inherit nothing. Instead wife #2 is providing for her family on another continent. So my parents "worked" all their lives to support people they never met and had no connection to. |
This is what's most likely to happen OP. It's also currently happening in my family. Golddigger was dating and then married a male family member with HFA. After a couple of years, she figured out the parents didn't have as much money as she thought and none of it was coming to their kids, so she divorced him. You are not doing any favors to your grandchild by singling him out to get money. |
Of course, he is correct. While you can technically do whatever you want, it's kind of scummy to support the son with the autistic son AND disinherit the son who is making his own living. He's not necessarily "greedy," you just rubbed salt in the wound by telling him your plans. Terrible idea to leave this as your final, irrevocable message after death. Because I enjoy it, I plan to lavish my grandchildren with experiences, help with their education, but the "inherited wealth" will go through my children. |
| Don't do it |
| Worst grand parent ever. |
| Oh OP! You have already done so much damage in these relationships that there’s no coming back. Accept that your kids’ relationships are messed up for life and you’ve created all of it by enabling one child over another. Just spend all your money in life - preferably not on the in-house son who seems to already be getting the benefits of your money. |
| Bad idea |
|
My grandfather altered his will giving one son 70% and the other son and daughter each 15%. He had it split evenly, but the son that got 70% did quit his job to take care of him and my grandmother before they died. My mom was also there a lot, and the youngest brother is just an ass overall. The split of money caused a big divide, the youngest son doesn't talk to the other 2 and threatened to not sign off on the will. Fun times.
Don't be a dick. |
|
How much are you talking about?
I would do exactly the same as OP. It seems perfectly reasonable. If there is enough, I would fund enough for college for the other 3 grandchildren. My kids are still young and I don’t come from money. I would absolutely give more to the kid with more hardship like a SN child. |
|
So OP has 2 sons - one lives with him and has autistic son and other son is financially well off and has 2 ADHD sons. I think it seems normal for OP to want to leave more for the son she lives with who cannot support his autistic son.
I have 3 kids. We talked about it recently and we all said that if one kid is struggling while other sibling is doing well financially, kids said we can give more to struggling sibling. |
| OP you can do whatever you want. If it were me, I'd leave money to all my kids and grandkids. The PP's are correct that it does leave hurt feelings and animosity; I've seen this play out with a couple of my friends. |