you forgot Penn State in the not warmer category |
Harder to get into. |
|
W&M wants people who want it. They will let in someone with somewhat lower stats if they can see a lot of demonstrated interest and knowledge of what kind of school it is.
W&M is great for kids who would like a more artsy, less rah-rah, hype squad scene. So many of the people who choose W&M are not interested in UVA so it isn’t some kind of back up choice. |
Yes U of Miami private in FL pretty tough to get into Miami of Ohio public not so much |
+1. Omg yes! My dd wasn’t even a contender (went to GMU with success), DS went to uva and we were thrilled but looking at SCHEV statistics, he would’ve never get in today |
Isn't Ohio State something like 60,000 students?? That is indeed, huge. |
Again - the comparison in this particular discussion (above) is between VT and UVA. Not WM. |
And vice-versa. |
Exactly! UVA & WM are both great but for different tastes — like comparing apples to oranges. |
|
JMU
|
U of Miami is not hard at all. It's along the lines of Tech. |
| Uh, no |
| 18% acceptance rate this year. |
| Weak florist |
This was in reference to Virginia Tech, not W&M. W&M has a 37% admission rate and equal academic student profile as UVA so not that much easier to get into that UVA. Virginia Tech, despite not admitting some high scoring students, has a higher acceptance rate (56.5% or higher once you figure in their use of the waitlist) and lower academic profile. W&M is similar to UVA in a bit more focus on a liberal arts core, but VT is more similar in being a bigger sports-oriented, strong academic school. VT is a lot bigger and W&M is a lot smaller. So if a kid was drawn to UVA, but not academically quite able to meet their profile, VT is a reasonable back-up if the reason they were drawn to it was that it was pretty big, school spirit around sports etc. If they were drawn to the liberal arts core of UVA but didn't have the academic profile, it would be better to aim for CNU or UMW in Virginia than W&M. |