Oh, so your position is based purely on DC’s tax revenue, and not sour grapes that your little precious didn’t get into Sidwell, and therefore won’t be having sleepovers at the White House. Gotcha.
|
I'm guessing you hate poor people and minorities, since you're convinced that we're ruining the DC schools. Well for your information, we've been the base of DC for years and most of us won't be leaving DC anytime soon. Why don't you get back to your Klan meeting.
|
From what I've read over the years, DC public schools are worse than PG County's but better than Baltimore City's.
|
We know FFX and MoCo USED to have great publics, but MoCo's been going downhill for years. FFX is even starting to crumble around the edges. All of this is moot of course in that no-one in DC wants preferential treatment for DC residents at DC privates. We'd just like the burb families to be less tacky and actually pay their way for once in a blue moon. As for moving Sidwell or any other private to the burbs, who cares? Not that it's even an option but just to play the game? More parkland and facilities inside the city, some of which will be taxable. Win win. |
I thought her point was that she got into Sidwell but would rather not have to share the space with cookie cutter burb kids. |
| If this is true it's pretty funny. Sudwell's lower school isn't even in DC. |
|
The burgeoning Sharks vs. Jets rivalry has inspired me (with apologies to West Side Story and 'I Like to be in America'):
I like to live in Bethesda, and That doesn't make me an also ran. Shall I still raise a St albans man? To quote Obama-- yes I can! Why would you live in Bethesda, now? Put out to pasture just like a cow! At DC publics you may sneer But Beltway traffic's what I most fear! Suburban lifestyle's where it's at! (Driving your mini-van getting fat!) True sophisticates live in DC! (Then pin your school hopes on Michelle Rhee!) ALL: We love to post on DCUM Vilify most on DCUM! Civility's toast on DCUM We'd rather roast on DCUM! |
You guess wrong. It has nothing to do with minorities and everything to do with profound entrenched concentrated poverty. Black or white, if your school is 90+ percent subsidized lunch, it's also a sure bet in DC that 70% of it's students are reading at below grade level. Doesn't matter if it's WV or DC or an Indian reservation. Now maybe it's a government plot, or maybe Fact wears a white hood, but don't blame the messenger. There's a reason for the mass exodus of the black middle class from DC over the last fourth years, and it ain't cause they were a bunch of racists. |
This is the best post - LET'S PUT THIS NONSENSE TO REST!!!! |
Wow! I can't believe that you're gleefully talking about "exterminating" poor people, Blacks and Hispanics from DC like they are roaches or something. You are unbelievably cold, heartless and hateful. Didn't you get the memo? Jim Crow is over.
|
Couple of things: first, I'm not calling for the "extermination of Blacks and Hispanics", nor did I think my tone was particularly gleeful. I was just describing the dynamic that's currently operating, and that will continue to operate to give the District the same demographic profile as the rest of the region. There's nothing about cities in particular that makes them the natural property of the poor--the situation in the last half of the 20th century was a historical anomaly. The future of DC will be more like Paris than Detroit. Secondly, and I'm guessing you were just venting, but a minor historical point: Jim Crow is usually defined as a "legal segregation in all public facilities, with a supposedly 'separate but equal' status for black Americans." This is different from "the failure to provide bottomless subsidies so that poor folks can have a DC address." Your equating a marginal down-tick in the total percentage of folks living in DC who are entirely dependent of taxpayer subsidies--and a corresponding marginal up-tick in the same demographic in the suburbs--with Jim Crow is as ridiculous as comparing it to the Holocaust. Such childish hyperbole doesn't help you make your point, it just detracts from it. |
|
To the PP who said: "We'd just like the burb families to be less tacky and actually pay their way for once in a blue moon."
Take a look at the donor page in your school publications. Put a "MD" or a "VA" next to each family you recognize as being a "tacky burb family." Then do the math. Schools are admitting suburban families in part because they want to cast a wide net -- to admit the top student from each school. But they're admitting them in part because they ARE paying their way (and ours) through very significant donations. DC residents do not tend to make capital or annual gifts at the same level as suburban families. Ask your development officer. If s/he knows you well enough, you won't get a diplomatic answer but the truth. |
| This thread is crazy...who started it anyway? There are so many crazy assertions on both sides. For the pp -- how in the world would you know who is making which donations and where they live? Many really wealthy donors are anonymous. |
| I think the underlying sentiment is that some people are just tired of suburbanites freeriding on the city. Stay in your suburbs. |
| I'm 15:13 -- I live in the heart of DC pp. I get the gyst of the thread. I just think it's senseless because no one is going to change anyone's mind. |