Maine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People people people. Are we really to believe suddenly republicans and other supposed democrats are so concerned about women’s rights that they are going to take a guy who served his country down for being ‘mean’ to one ex girlfriend years ago (who just happens to be a Republican operative). Versus a woman who voted to strip women of their reproductive rights ??

They tried the Nazi card.
They tried the fake trust fund card

Didn’t work. So this is their next attempt.

It is so very very obvious.

And what’s scary to me is it’s not just Republicans trying to take him down. It’s Democrats too. The NYT runs a story about this guy every other day now, recycling the same old story from the ex gf.

There is no need to further debate his ‘abuse’. It’s exaggerated nonsense and it does not matter.

Ha ha ha ha ha.
"A guy who served his country" because he wanted to kill. Don't make this guy out to be some hero because he served. Many veterans are heros. Not this scumbag.

You, my dear, are ignoring all the evidence. Credible evidence.
He's not just been "mean." He has been abusive. And, he lies about it. Just like the evidence - and plenty of it - that he lied about knowing the meaning of his tattoo.

Tell yourself whatever you need to in order to support this fraud. Toss aside all your strongly held beliefs for how ever long you have held them.
Plenty others are doing the same thing. And, the support you and other Democrats are showing for this creep will come back to bite you.

I can't stand the guy. Not only because of what he has done and what he has said, but because he doesn't have an honest bone in his body. And, because he is using PTSD as a crutch for his abhorrent behavior.
And, because of his absolutely batshit policy positions.

+100
I almost hope he does win. He's everything Democrats deserve.

I still can't get past him saying he wanted to RAPE a home intruder to show his dominance. That's... something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People people people. Are we really to believe suddenly republicans and other supposed democrats are so concerned about women’s rights that they are going to take a guy who served his country down for being ‘mean’ to one ex girlfriend years ago (who just happens to be a Republican operative). Versus a woman who voted to strip women of their reproductive rights ??

They tried the Nazi card.
They tried the fake trust fund card

Didn’t work. So this is their next attempt.

It is so very very obvious.

And what’s scary to me is it’s not just Republicans trying to take him down. It’s Democrats too. The NYT runs a story about this guy every other day now, recycling the same old story from the ex gf.

There is no need to further debate his ‘abuse’. It’s exaggerated nonsense and it does not matter.

Ha ha ha ha ha.
"A guy who served his country" because he wanted to kill. Don't make this guy out to be some hero because he served. Many veterans are heros. Not this scumbag.

You, my dear, are ignoring all the evidence. Credible evidence.
He's not just been "mean." He has been abusive. And, he lies about it. Just like the evidence - and plenty of it - that he lied about knowing the meaning of his tattoo.

Tell yourself whatever you need to in order to support this fraud. Toss aside all your strongly held beliefs for how ever long you have held them.
Plenty others are doing the same thing. And, the support you and other Democrats are showing for this creep will come back to bite you.

I can't stand the guy. Not only because of what he has done and what he has said, but because he doesn't have an honest bone in his body. And, because he is using PTSD as a crutch for his abhorrent behavior.
And, because of his absolutely batshit policy positions.

He is a hero. Unlike president bone spurs. He served our country and he deserves respect for it. Shame on you for doing otherwise.

The best you can come up with is an ex girlfriend Republican operative who says his behavior was ‘unsettling’? After he came back from multiple tours of duty? Of course that would affect someone. How dare you attack a veteran like that.

The fact is you just can’t stand that he doesn’t support your chosen causes.

Sorry, couldn't get past the bolded.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Ooh, now do Joe Biden who pledged to only serve ONE term as president but then liked the gig so much he decided to run again! And would indeed have run - in a cloud of senility - had he not been forced to step down. Remember that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately for everyone from out of state posting so vehemently against him, he’s hit broad support at home. And honestly, the more he gets pounded in the national press, the better it is for him. I saw something fitting on social today: We don’t need anyone Mainesplaining Maine to us.

And yet, no doubt Mainers were happy to weigh in on elections in other states, such as Youngkin, DeSantis, Paxton, etc. Funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is such a fraud, but at this point, he is the Democrats' only hope so they will forget anything they have championed (Me Too, Nazi sympathizer, etc.) to support this loser. More proof that those causes they champion are not sincerely held positions or things they actually believe, but causes to support when politically expedient.

+ a million

It’s almost as if these anti-Platner posts are coordinated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is such a fraud, but at this point, he is the Democrats' only hope so they will forget anything they have championed (Me Too, Nazi sympathizer, etc.) to support this loser. More proof that those causes they champion are not sincerely held positions or things they actually believe, but causes to support when politically expedient.

+ a million

It’s almost as if these anti-Platner posts are coordinated.

Yes it is so obvious. So very very obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People people people. Are we really to believe suddenly republicans and other supposed democrats are so concerned about women’s rights that they are going to take a guy who served his country down for being ‘mean’ to one ex girlfriend years ago (who just happens to be a Republican operative). Versus a woman who voted to strip women of their reproductive rights ??

They tried the Nazi card.
They tried the fake trust fund card

Didn’t work. So this is their next attempt.

It is so very very obvious.

And what’s scary to me is it’s not just Republicans trying to take him down. It’s Democrats too. The NYT runs a story about this guy every other day now, recycling the same old story from the ex gf.

There is no need to further debate his ‘abuse’. It’s exaggerated nonsense and it does not matter.

Ha ha ha ha ha.
"A guy who served his country" because he wanted to kill. Don't make this guy out to be some hero because he served. Many veterans are heros. Not this scumbag.

You, my dear, are ignoring all the evidence. Credible evidence.
He's not just been "mean." He has been abusive. And, he lies about it. Just like the evidence - and plenty of it - that he lied about knowing the meaning of his tattoo.

Tell yourself whatever you need to in order to support this fraud. Toss aside all your strongly held beliefs for how ever long you have held them.
Plenty others are doing the same thing. And, the support you and other Democrats are showing for this creep will come back to bite you.

I can't stand the guy. Not only because of what he has done and what he has said, but because he doesn't have an honest bone in his body. And, because he is using PTSD as a crutch for his abhorrent behavior.
And, because of his absolutely batshit policy positions.

+100
I almost hope he does win. He's everything Democrats deserve.

I still can't get past him saying he wanted to RAPE a home intruder to show his dominance. That's... something.

Ooh so scary! He said a bad *word* about a home intruder. So scary!! WOW. YOU REALLY GOT HIM!! /s/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People people people. Are we really to believe suddenly republicans and other supposed democrats are so concerned about women’s rights that they are going to take a guy who served his country down for being ‘mean’ to one ex girlfriend years ago (who just happens to be a Republican operative). Versus a woman who voted to strip women of their reproductive rights ??

They tried the Nazi card.
They tried the fake trust fund card

Didn’t work. So this is their next attempt.

It is so very very obvious.

And what’s scary to me is it’s not just Republicans trying to take him down. It’s Democrats too. The NYT runs a story about this guy every other day now, recycling the same old story from the ex gf.

There is no need to further debate his ‘abuse’. It’s exaggerated nonsense and it does not matter.

Ha ha ha ha ha.
"A guy who served his country" because he wanted to kill. Don't make this guy out to be some hero because he served. Many veterans are heros. Not this scumbag.

You, my dear, are ignoring all the evidence. Credible evidence.
He's not just been "mean." He has been abusive. And, he lies about it. Just like the evidence - and plenty of it - that he lied about knowing the meaning of his tattoo.

Tell yourself whatever you need to in order to support this fraud. Toss aside all your strongly held beliefs for how ever long you have held them.
Plenty others are doing the same thing. And, the support you and other Democrats are showing for this creep will come back to bite you.

I can't stand the guy. Not only because of what he has done and what he has said, but because he doesn't have an honest bone in his body. And, because he is using PTSD as a crutch for his abhorrent behavior.
And, because of his absolutely batshit policy positions.

He is a hero. Unlike president bone spurs. He served our country and he deserves respect for it. Shame on you for doing otherwise.

The best you can come up with is an ex girlfriend Republican operative who says his behavior was ‘unsettling’? After he came back from multiple tours of duty? Of course that would affect someone. How dare you attack a veteran like that.

The fact is you just can’t stand that he doesn’t support your chosen causes.

Sorry, couldn't get past the bolded.
DP

Yes. Someone who serves our country in the armed forces is a hero.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately for everyone from out of state posting so vehemently against him, he’s hit broad support at home. And honestly, the more he gets pounded in the national press, the better it is for him. I saw something fitting on social today: We don’t need anyone Mainesplaining Maine to us.

These are coordinated attacks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately for everyone from out of state posting so vehemently against him, he’s hit broad support at home. And honestly, the more he gets pounded in the national press, the better it is for him. I saw something fitting on social today: We don’t need anyone Mainesplaining Maine to us.

These are coordinated attacks

Yes, obviously. I’m the PP. there were so many anti platner adds during game 4 of nba finals. Funded by the pine tree results PAC which is, no surprise, largely funded by out of state billionaires.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People people people. Are we really to believe suddenly republicans and other supposed democrats are so concerned about women’s rights that they are going to take a guy who served his country down for being ‘mean’ to one ex girlfriend years ago (who just happens to be a Republican operative). Versus a woman who voted to strip women of their reproductive rights ??

They tried the Nazi card.
They tried the fake trust fund card

Didn’t work. So this is their next attempt.

It is so very very obvious.

And what’s scary to me is it’s not just Republicans trying to take him down. It’s Democrats too. The NYT runs a story about this guy every other day now, recycling the same old story from the ex gf.

There is no need to further debate his ‘abuse’. It’s exaggerated nonsense and it does not matter.

Ha ha ha ha ha.
"A guy who served his country" because he wanted to kill. Don't make this guy out to be some hero because he served. Many veterans are heros. Not this scumbag.

You, my dear, are ignoring all the evidence. Credible evidence.
He's not just been "mean." He has been abusive. And, he lies about it. Just like the evidence - and plenty of it - that he lied about knowing the meaning of his tattoo.

Tell yourself whatever you need to in order to support this fraud. Toss aside all your strongly held beliefs for how ever long you have held them.
Plenty others are doing the same thing. And, the support you and other Democrats are showing for this creep will come back to bite you.

I can't stand the guy. Not only because of what he has done and what he has said, but because he doesn't have an honest bone in his body. And, because he is using PTSD as a crutch for his abhorrent behavior.
And, because of his absolutely batshit policy positions.

He is a hero. Unlike president bone spurs. He served our country and he deserves respect for it. Shame on you for doing otherwise.

The best you can come up with is an ex girlfriend Republican operative who says his behavior was ‘unsettling’? After he came back from multiple tours of duty? Of course that would affect someone. How dare you attack a veteran like that.

The fact is you just can’t stand that he doesn’t support your chosen causes.

Sorry, couldn't get past the bolded.
DP

Yes. Someone who serves our country in the armed forces is a hero.

Blackwater - where Platner worked - is a murderous mercenary group; they did not “serve our country.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ooh, now do Joe Biden who pledged to only serve ONE term as president but then liked the gig so much he decided to run again! And would indeed have run - in a cloud of senility - had he not been forced to step down. Remember that?

As someone who actually lived in Maine when Collins first ran (and who worked for her opponent in that campaign), I think being honest people should acknowledge that Collins was encouraged by her constituents to run for a third term - and a fourth and fifth - and that she has enjoyed crossover support and strong support from swing voters for decades.

It’s not inconsistent to have made a campaign promise regarding self imposed term limits and to fail to keep the promise when your constituents are begging you to stay in office and the results at the ballot box suggest it’s a widely held position.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ooh, now do Joe Biden who pledged to only serve ONE term as president but then liked the gig so much he decided to run again! And would indeed have run - in a cloud of senility - had he not been forced to step down. Remember that?

As someone who actually lived in Maine when Collins first ran (and who worked for her opponent in that campaign), I think being honest people should acknowledge that Collins was encouraged by her constituents to run for a third term - and a fourth and fifth - and that she has enjoyed crossover support and strong support from swing voters for decades.

It’s not inconsistent to have made a campaign promise regarding self imposed term limits and to fail to keep the promise when your constituents are begging you to stay in office and the results at the ballot box suggest it’s a widely held position.

+1 This isn’t a great argument (although quit the Biden whataboutism - he never “pledged to only serve ONE term as president”) and the argument that she never ever holds town halls is a much stronger one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ooh, now do Joe Biden who pledged to only serve ONE term as president but then liked the gig so much he decided to run again! And would indeed have run - in a cloud of senility - had he not been forced to step down. Remember that?

As someone who actually lived in Maine when Collins first ran (and who worked for her opponent in that campaign), I think being honest people should acknowledge that Collins was encouraged by her constituents to run for a third term - and a fourth and fifth - and that she has enjoyed crossover support and strong support from swing voters for decades.

It’s not inconsistent to have made a campaign promise regarding self imposed term limits and to fail to keep the promise when your constituents are begging you to stay in office and the results at the ballot box suggest it’s a widely held position.

I can think of more compelling reasons Collins kept running besides constituent support.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Ooh, now do Joe Biden who pledged to only serve ONE term as president but then liked the gig so much he decided to run again! And would indeed have run - in a cloud of senility - had he not been forced to step down. Remember that?

Your mean 50 years-in-orifice Brandon?