Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The part I love the most about Russian propagandists is how hypocritical they are.

"Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov's mistress owns a villa next to members of the Russian military elite in the Black Sea resort of Sochi and gave birth to her children in the U.S."
"According to the investigation, Svetlana Abrosimova, a former basketball player, is Solovyov's mistress and gave birth to their two daughters in the U.S. in 2017."
https://kyivindependent.com/media-top-russian-propagandist-has-second-family-in-us/

Then you will love Zelensky’s villa in Italy, too.

Tell me you're ignorant and clueless without telling me you're ignorant and clueless.

Prior to becoming President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a highly successful actor and comedian along with founding and running a highly successful media media production company, Kvartal 95. He owned the Italian villa before becoming President, and sold it last year.

So you're trying to make some kind of dumb point which is entirely pointless.

And then there was this bit in the Pandora Papers:

Actor Volodymyr Zelensky stormed to the Ukrainian presidency in 2019 on a wave of public anger against the country’s political class, including previous leaders who used secret companies to stash their wealth overseas.

Now, leaked documents prove that Zelensky and his inner circle have had their own network of offshore companies. Two belonging to the president’s partners were used to buy expensive property in London.

The revelations come from documents in the Pandora Papers, millions of files from 14 offshore service providers leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and shared with partners around the world including OCCRP.

The documents show that Zelensky and his partners in a television production company, Kvartal 95, set up a network of offshore firms dating back to at least 2012, the year the company began making regular content for TV stations owned by Ihor Kolomoisky, an oligarch dogged by allegations of multi-billion-dollar fraud. The offshores were also used by Zelensky associates to purchase and own three prime properties in the center of London.
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-pandora-papers/pandora-papers-reveal-offshore-holdings-of-ukrainian-president-and-his-inner-circle

Wow. Imagine that. A successful TV production company made money and was able to buy properties and hold foreign assets. Big deal. Nothing strange or illegal about that. And a TV network broadcast some of their content, but later their owner turned out to be corrupt, like Rupert Murdoch. So by your logic does that mean that every TV production company that ever had anything to do with FOX is somehow corrupt and doing illegal stuff?

Ooogha boogha innuendo innuendo

Now how about you talk about how someone like Vladimir Putin somehow became worth upward of $70 billion with his entire career being a "public servant" with zero corruption involved? Or how in fact we don't even know what his full wealth is, given how completely opaque and corrupt Russia is on these types of matters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The part I love the most about Russian propagandists is how hypocritical they are.

"Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov's mistress owns a villa next to members of the Russian military elite in the Black Sea resort of Sochi and gave birth to her children in the U.S."
"According to the investigation, Svetlana Abrosimova, a former basketball player, is Solovyov's mistress and gave birth to their two daughters in the U.S. in 2017."
https://kyivindependent.com/media-top-russian-propagandist-has-second-family-in-us/

Then you will love Zelensky’s villa in Italy, too.

Tell me you're ignorant and clueless without telling me you're ignorant and clueless.

Prior to becoming President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a highly successful actor and comedian along with founding and running a highly successful media media production company, Kvartal 95. He owned the Italian villa before becoming President, and sold it last year.

So you're trying to make some kind of dumb point which is entirely pointless.

And then there was this bit in the Pandora Papers:

Actor Volodymyr Zelensky stormed to the Ukrainian presidency in 2019 on a wave of public anger against the country’s political class, including previous leaders who used secret companies to stash their wealth overseas.

Now, leaked documents prove that Zelensky and his inner circle have had their own network of offshore companies. Two belonging to the president’s partners were used to buy expensive property in London.

The revelations come from documents in the Pandora Papers, millions of files from 14 offshore service providers leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and shared with partners around the world including OCCRP.

The documents show that Zelensky and his partners in a television production company, Kvartal 95, set up a network of offshore firms dating back to at least 2012, the year the company began making regular content for TV stations owned by Ihor Kolomoisky, an oligarch dogged by allegations of multi-billion-dollar fraud. The offshores were also used by Zelensky associates to purchase and own three prime properties in the center of London.
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-pandora-papers/pandora-papers-reveal-offshore-holdings-of-ukrainian-president-and-his-inner-circle

Wow. Imagine that. A successful TV production company made money and was able to buy properties and hold foreign assets. Big deal. Nothing strange or illegal about that. And a TV network broadcast some of their content, but later their owner turned out to be corrupt, like Rupert Murdoch. So by your logic does that mean that every TV production company that ever had anything to do with FOX is somehow corrupt and doing illegal stuff?

Ooogha boogha innuendo innuendo

Now how about you talk about how someone like Vladimir Putin somehow became worth upward of $70 billion with his entire career being a "public servant" with zero corruption involved? Or how in fact we don't even know what his full wealth is, given how completely opaque and corrupt Russia is on these types of matters?

No one holds up Putin as an example of anything. His corruption is a proven fact.

Zelensky, on the other hand...

Now, as to "nothing strange or illegal about that": from the same source.

Even as Zelensky pushes his anti-oligarch campaign, some continue to doubt his sincerity. Among them is Ruslan Ryaboshapka, who was picked by Zelensky as the country’s top prosecutor in 2019, but ousted from the role in early 2020. He told OCCRP he believes this was due to pressure from the oligarch Kolomoisky.

“A president shouldn’t own offshore companies. In general offshore companies are bad, whether they’re owned by a president or not,” Ryaboshapka said.

He called moving money offshore “an old tradition” in Ukraine, because the country was perceived as a dangerous place with “no rule of law.” But still, the use of such companies today raises red flags of “tax evasion or the legalization of dirty money,” he said.

“That’s the essence of offshore companies.”

Aubrey Belford (OCCRP), Margot Gibbs (ICIJ), Luke Harding (The Guardian), and Simon Goodley (The Guardian) contributed reporting.

[Anonymous]

In the meantime, Jeffrey Sachs:

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/the-war-in-ukraine-was-provoked-and-why-that-matters-if-we-want-peace
Recognizing that the war was provoked helps us to understand how to stop it. It doesn’t justify Russia’s invasion. A far better approach for Russia might have been to step up diplomacy with Europe and with the non-Western world to explain and oppose U.S. militarism and unilateralism. In fact, the relentless U.S. push to expand NATO is widely opposed throughout the world, so Russian diplomacy rather than war would likely have been effective.

The Biden team uses the word “unprovoked” incessantly, most recently in Biden’s major speech on the first-year anniversary of the war, in a recent NATO statement, and in the most recent G7 statement. Mainstream media friendly to Biden simply parrot the White House. The New York Times is the lead culprit, describing the invasion as “unprovoked” no fewer than 26 times, in five editorials, 14 opinion columns by NYT writers, and seven guest op-eds!

There were in fact two main U.S. provocations. The first was the U.S. intention to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia in order to surround Russia in the Black Sea region by NATO countries (Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Georgia, in counterclockwise order). The second was the U.S. role in installing a Russophobic regime in Ukraine by the violent overthrow of Ukraine’s pro-Russian President, Viktor Yanukovych, in February 2014. The shooting war in Ukraine began with Yanukovych’s overthrow nine years ago, not in February 2022 as the U.S. government, NATO, and the G7 leaders would have us believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The part I love the most about Russian propagandists is how hypocritical they are.

"Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov's mistress owns a villa next to members of the Russian military elite in the Black Sea resort of Sochi and gave birth to her children in the U.S."
"According to the investigation, Svetlana Abrosimova, a former basketball player, is Solovyov's mistress and gave birth to their two daughters in the U.S. in 2017."
https://kyivindependent.com/media-top-russian-propagandist-has-second-family-in-us/

Then you will love Zelensky’s villa in Italy, too.

Tell me you're ignorant and clueless without telling me you're ignorant and clueless.

Prior to becoming President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a highly successful actor and comedian along with founding and running a highly successful media media production company, Kvartal 95. He owned the Italian villa before becoming President, and sold it last year.

So you're trying to make some kind of dumb point which is entirely pointless.

And then there was this bit in the Pandora Papers:

Actor Volodymyr Zelensky stormed to the Ukrainian presidency in 2019 on a wave of public anger against the country’s political class, including previous leaders who used secret companies to stash their wealth overseas.

Now, leaked documents prove that Zelensky and his inner circle have had their own network of offshore companies. Two belonging to the president’s partners were used to buy expensive property in London.

The revelations come from documents in the Pandora Papers, millions of files from 14 offshore service providers leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and shared with partners around the world including OCCRP.

The documents show that Zelensky and his partners in a television production company, Kvartal 95, set up a network of offshore firms dating back to at least 2012, the year the company began making regular content for TV stations owned by Ihor Kolomoisky, an oligarch dogged by allegations of multi-billion-dollar fraud. The offshores were also used by Zelensky associates to purchase and own three prime properties in the center of London.
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-pandora-papers/pandora-papers-reveal-offshore-holdings-of-ukrainian-president-and-his-inner-circle

Wow. Imagine that. A successful TV production company made money and was able to buy properties and hold foreign assets. Big deal. Nothing strange or illegal about that. And a TV network broadcast some of their content, but later their owner turned out to be corrupt, like Rupert Murdoch. So by your logic does that mean that every TV production company that ever had anything to do with FOX is somehow corrupt and doing illegal stuff?

Ooogha boogha innuendo innuendo

Now how about you talk about how someone like Vladimir Putin somehow became worth upward of $70 billion with his entire career being a "public servant" with zero corruption involved? Or how in fact we don't even know what his full wealth is, given how completely opaque and corrupt Russia is on these types of matters?

No one holds up Putin as an example of anything. His corruption is a proven fact.

Zelensky, on the other hand...

Now, as to "nothing strange or illegal about that": from the same source.

Even as Zelensky pushes his anti-oligarch campaign, some continue to doubt his sincerity. Among them is Ruslan Ryaboshapka, who was picked by Zelensky as the country’s top prosecutor in 2019, but ousted from the role in early 2020. He told OCCRP he believes this was due to pressure from the oligarch Kolomoisky.

“A president shouldn’t own offshore companies. In general offshore companies are bad, whether they’re owned by a president or not,” Ryaboshapka said.

He called moving money offshore “an old tradition” in Ukraine, because the country was perceived as a dangerous place with “no rule of law.” But still, the use of such companies today raises red flags of “tax evasion or the legalization of dirty money,” he said.

“That’s the essence of offshore companies.”

Aubrey Belford (OCCRP), Margot Gibbs (ICIJ), Luke Harding (The Guardian), and Simon Goodley (The Guardian) contributed reporting.

Seems your info is outdated and irrelevant given Zelenskyy cracked down on Kolomoisky https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64482072

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the meantime, Jeffrey Sachs:

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/the-war-in-ukraine-was-provoked-and-why-that-matters-if-we-want-peace
Recognizing that the war was provoked helps us to understand how to stop it. It doesn’t justify Russia’s invasion. A far better approach for Russia might have been to step up diplomacy with Europe and with the non-Western world to explain and oppose U.S. militarism and unilateralism. In fact, the relentless U.S. push to expand NATO is widely opposed throughout the world, so Russian diplomacy rather than war would likely have been effective.

The Biden team uses the word “unprovoked” incessantly, most recently in Biden’s major speech on the first-year anniversary of the war, in a recent NATO statement, and in the most recent G7 statement. Mainstream media friendly to Biden simply parrot the White House. The New York Times is the lead culprit, describing the invasion as “unprovoked” no fewer than 26 times, in five editorials, 14 opinion columns by NYT writers, and seven guest op-eds!

There were in fact two main U.S. provocations. The first was the U.S. intention to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia in order to surround Russia in the Black Sea region by NATO countries (Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Georgia, in counterclockwise order). The second was the U.S. role in installing a Russophobic regime in Ukraine by the violent overthrow of Ukraine’s pro-Russian President, Viktor Yanukovych, in February 2014. The shooting war in Ukraine began with Yanukovych’s overthrow nine years ago, not in February 2022 as the U.S. government, NATO, and the G7 leaders would have us believe.

This was entirely Putin's war of choice. There was absolutely zero credible threat of anything like an imminent invasion of Russia by NATO. This was 100% Putin's choosing. You can't even see that through his thin veneer of lame, non-credible excuses? If you want to cite military bases by NATO nations near Russia's border consider also that a majority of Russian bases were near its borders with NATO. Thus by your own logic, NATO should have had an excuse to go ahead and invade Russia. But they did not. Russia is the sole invader here.

[Anonymous]

Kaliningrad has been surrounded by NATO since 2004. So where does this sudden hysteria over Ukraine come from?

Oh. I know, it comes from Putin's fever dreams of restoring the former Soviet Union, and his big box of fabricated excuses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kaliningrad has been surrounded by NATO since 2004. So where does this sudden hysteria over Ukraine come from?

Oh. I know, it comes from Putin's fever dreams of restoring the former Soviet Union, and his big box of fabricated excuses.

Russia knows Kaliningrad is really German territory that they temporarily occupy. Its long been rumored to be a potential bargaining chip in east-west relations. Its nothing like being in the Slavic heartland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The part I love the most about Russian propagandists is how hypocritical they are.

"Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov's mistress owns a villa next to members of the Russian military elite in the Black Sea resort of Sochi and gave birth to her children in the U.S."
"According to the investigation, Svetlana Abrosimova, a former basketball player, is Solovyov's mistress and gave birth to their two daughters in the U.S. in 2017."
https://kyivindependent.com/media-top-russian-propagandist-has-second-family-in-us/

Then you will love Zelensky’s villa in Italy, too.

Tell me you're ignorant and clueless without telling me you're ignorant and clueless.

Prior to becoming President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a highly successful actor and comedian along with founding and running a highly successful media media production company, Kvartal 95. He owned the Italian villa before becoming President, and sold it last year.

So you're trying to make some kind of dumb point which is entirely pointless.

And then there was this bit in the Pandora Papers:

Actor Volodymyr Zelensky stormed to the Ukrainian presidency in 2019 on a wave of public anger against the country’s political class, including previous leaders who used secret companies to stash their wealth overseas.

Now, leaked documents prove that Zelensky and his inner circle have had their own network of offshore companies. Two belonging to the president’s partners were used to buy expensive property in London.

The revelations come from documents in the Pandora Papers, millions of files from 14 offshore service providers leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and shared with partners around the world including OCCRP.

The documents show that Zelensky and his partners in a television production company, Kvartal 95, set up a network of offshore firms dating back to at least 2012, the year the company began making regular content for TV stations owned by Ihor Kolomoisky, an oligarch dogged by allegations of multi-billion-dollar fraud. The offshores were also used by Zelensky associates to purchase and own three prime properties in the center of London.
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-pandora-papers/pandora-papers-reveal-offshore-holdings-of-ukrainian-president-and-his-inner-circle

Wow. Imagine that. A successful TV production company made money and was able to buy properties and hold foreign assets. Big deal. Nothing strange or illegal about that. And a TV network broadcast some of their content, but later their owner turned out to be corrupt, like Rupert Murdoch. So by your logic does that mean that every TV production company that ever had anything to do with FOX is somehow corrupt and doing illegal stuff?

Ooogha boogha innuendo innuendo

Now how about you talk about how someone like Vladimir Putin somehow became worth upward of $70 billion with his entire career being a "public servant" with zero corruption involved? Or how in fact we don't even know what his full wealth is, given how completely opaque and corrupt Russia is on these types of matters?

No one holds up Putin as an example of anything. His corruption is a proven fact.

Zelensky, on the other hand...

Now, as to "nothing strange or illegal about that": from the same source.

Even as Zelensky pushes his anti-oligarch campaign, some continue to doubt his sincerity. Among them is Ruslan Ryaboshapka, who was picked by Zelensky as the country’s top prosecutor in 2019, but ousted from the role in early 2020. He told OCCRP he believes this was due to pressure from the oligarch Kolomoisky.

“A president shouldn’t own offshore companies. In general offshore companies are bad, whether they’re owned by a president or not,” Ryaboshapka said.

He called moving money offshore “an old tradition” in Ukraine, because the country was perceived as a dangerous place with “no rule of law.” But still, the use of such companies today raises red flags of “tax evasion or the legalization of dirty money,” he said.

“That’s the essence of offshore companies.”

Aubrey Belford (OCCRP), Margot Gibbs (ICIJ), Luke Harding (The Guardian), and Simon Goodley (The Guardian) contributed reporting.

Seems your info is outdated and irrelevant given Zelenskyy cracked down on Kolomoisky https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64482072

Ah but did he crack down on his offshore holdings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m truly fascinated by the phenomenon here that when someone posts something less than full blown American engagement with Ukraine against Russian, that person is branded by someone else as a propagandist or Russian bot.

It’s worth a behavioral study.

On the contrary. I only call out a bot when it posts repetitive content seen on other websites. Could be wrong I don't see too much of it here, since when I saw the activity the bot got ripped to shreds? I think paid Russian propaganda trolls are still common on this website. But I think I can tell when those two people are taking a break. This thread dies down a lot.

Although I do think that both Russian and Chinese bot activity will pick up. I've seen a lot of Software Developer Kit activity as of late from Russian and Chinese state universities. But given how badly Russian propaganda has devolved, I don't think it will be anytime soon?

Simonyan (aka "Margo the Beaver"): "They want to take our beloved Crimea from us, and we are doing the only thing we can do in such a situation: we are bombing them! We bomb them daily, everything that moves. How did we want this? I know for sure that our management did not want it. Putin is shedding tears in his soul, but he has to bomb."
https://www.reflex.cz/clanek/profil/119043/jefim-fistejn-bobrozroutka-margo-aneb-pohledna-bohata-a-krute-prolhana-tvar-putinovy-propagandy.html

"Russian President Vladimir Putin declared last week that beer in Prague, where a summit between Kremlin critics recently took place, contains “female sex hormones”"
https://news.yahoo.com/former-moscow-officials-reveal-why-025231101.html

Yeesh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m truly fascinated by the phenomenon here that when someone posts something less than full blown American engagement with Ukraine against Russian, that person is branded by someone else as a propagandist or Russian bot.

It’s worth a behavioral study.

On the contrary. I only call out a bot when it posts repetitive content seen on other websites. Could be wrong I don't see too much of it here, since when I saw the activity the bot got ripped to shreds? I think paid Russian propaganda trolls are still common on this website. But I think I can tell when those two people are taking a break. This thread dies down a lot.

Although I do think that both Russian and Chinese bot activity will pick up. I've seen a lot of Software Developer Kit activity as of late from Russian and Chinese state universities. But given how badly Russian propaganda has devolved, I don't think it will be anytime soon?

Simonyan (aka "Margo the Beaver"): "They want to take our beloved Crimea from us, and we are doing the only thing we can do in such a situation: we are bombing them! We bomb them daily, everything that moves. How did we want this? I know for sure that our management did not want it. Putin is shedding tears in his soul, but he has to bomb."
https://www.reflex.cz/clanek/profil/119043/jefim-fistejn-bobrozroutka-margo-aneb-pohledna-bohata-a-krute-prolhana-tvar-putinovy-propagandy.html

"Russian President Vladimir Putin declared last week that beer in Prague, where a summit between Kremlin critics recently took place, contains “female sex hormones”"
https://news.yahoo.com/former-moscow-officials-reveal-why-025231101.html

Yeesh.

You call out a bot anytime anyone disagrees with you, or as much as doesn't share your fervor for the Ukrainian cause. On top of that is your nonstop cosplay as a thread police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the meantime, Jeffrey Sachs:

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/the-war-in-ukraine-was-provoked-and-why-that-matters-if-we-want-peace
Recognizing that the war was provoked helps us to understand how to stop it. It doesn’t justify Russia’s invasion. A far better approach for Russia might have been to step up diplomacy with Europe and with the non-Western world to explain and oppose U.S. militarism and unilateralism. In fact, the relentless U.S. push to expand NATO is widely opposed throughout the world, so Russian diplomacy rather than war would likely have been effective.

The Biden team uses the word “unprovoked” incessantly, most recently in Biden’s major speech on the first-year anniversary of the war, in a recent NATO statement, and in the most recent G7 statement. Mainstream media friendly to Biden simply parrot the White House. The New York Times is the lead culprit, describing the invasion as “unprovoked” no fewer than 26 times, in five editorials, 14 opinion columns by NYT writers, and seven guest op-eds!

There were in fact two main U.S. provocations. The first was the U.S. intention to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia in order to surround Russia in the Black Sea region by NATO countries (Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Georgia, in counterclockwise order). The second was the U.S. role in installing a Russophobic regime in Ukraine by the violent overthrow of Ukraine’s pro-Russian President, Viktor Yanukovych, in February 2014. The shooting war in Ukraine began with Yanukovych’s overthrow nine years ago, not in February 2022 as the U.S. government, NATO, and the G7 leaders would have us believe.

This was entirely Putin's war of choice. There was absolutely zero credible threat of anything like an imminent invasion of Russia by NATO. This was 100% Putin's choosing. You can't even see that through his thin veneer of lame, non-credible excuses? If you want to cite military bases by NATO nations near Russia's border consider also that a majority of Russian bases were near its borders with NATO. Thus by your own logic, NATO should have had an excuse to go ahead and invade Russia. But they did not. Russia is the sole invader here.

I guess what's left is for you to tell Jeffrey Sachs he is a Russian bot. Add a cc to Noah Chomsky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live in Ohio.
I support Ukraine and so do my neighbors.

Yeah so you live in a little Ukrainian American pocket of Ohio, yes? Keep collecting those supplies!

Another hallmark of propaganda bots are that they sometimes write nonsensical, but enthusiastic posts, like this one.

Anything to derail, deflect or lower morale. sucks that you shtbirds are losing lol.

Yeah yeah. Americans care so much about Donbas and they should/ they’ve all studied it growing up, seen the movies, the glamorous girls. Whole nine yards.

Let’s fight for the Donbas. Sign in the boys!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m truly fascinated by the phenomenon here that when someone posts something less than full blown American engagement with Ukraine against Russian, that person is branded by someone else as a propagandist or Russian bot.

It’s worth a behavioral study.

On the contrary. I only call out a bot when it posts repetitive content seen on other websites. Could be wrong I don't see too much of it here, since when I saw the activity the bot got ripped to shreds? I think paid Russian propaganda trolls are still common on this website. But I think I can tell when those two people are taking a break. This thread dies down a lot.

Although I do think that both Russian and Chinese bot activity will pick up. I've seen a lot of Software Developer Kit activity as of late from Russian and Chinese state universities. But given how badly Russian propaganda has devolved, I don't think it will be anytime soon?

Simonyan (aka "Margo the Beaver"): "They want to take our beloved Crimea from us, and we are doing the only thing we can do in such a situation: we are bombing them! We bomb them daily, everything that moves. How did we want this? I know for sure that our management did not want it. Putin is shedding tears in his soul, but he has to bomb."
https://www.reflex.cz/clanek/profil/119043/jefim-fistejn-bobrozroutka-margo-aneb-pohledna-bohata-a-krute-prolhana-tvar-putinovy-propagandy.html

"Russian President Vladimir Putin declared last week that beer in Prague, where a summit between Kremlin critics recently took place, contains “female sex hormones”"
https://news.yahoo.com/former-moscow-officials-reveal-why-025231101.html

Yeesh.

You call out a bot anytime anyone disagrees with you, or as much as doesn't share your fervor for the Ukrainian cause. On top of that is your nonstop cosplay as a thread police.

What I read? Blah, blah, blah. In the meantime, please enjoy this article of Russia's shrinking island..

"Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin and a delegation of his colleagues went to China this week with the hopes of further enhancing economic ties with Beijing."
"But Mishustin’s counterpart, the Chairman of the State Council Li Qiang, who invited him on the visit, reportedly refused to meet with him at the China-Russia Business Forum on Tuesday, according to Russian newspaper Vedomosti."
"Other top officials and managers of major Chinese companies also declined to meet with him and his colleagues, many of whom are sanctioned in the West due to Russia’s war in Ukraine, Vedomosti reported."
"Mishustin is the highest-ranking Russian official to visit Beijing since Russia launched its invasion in 2022."
“Even those big businessmen who wanted and were ready to speak publicly were not allowed to meet by the authorities—they don’t want to take even the smallest risk,”
"Other inconveniences reportedly cropped up during the trip as well. One Chinese currency exchange post refused to convert $100 for yuan for one of the Russian officials on the trip, since he shares the name of someone sanctioned."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/russian-prime-minister-gets-awkward-185935895.html

"Alexander Shiplyuk, head of Siberia's Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ITAM), is suspected of handing over classified material at a scientific conference in China in 2017, the sources said."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-russian-hypersonic-scientist-accused-102000357.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m truly fascinated by the phenomenon here that when someone posts something less than full blown American engagement with Ukraine against Russian, that person is branded by someone else as a propagandist or Russian bot.

It’s worth a behavioral study.

On the contrary. I only call out a bot when it posts repetitive content seen on other websites. Could be wrong I don't see too much of it here, since when I saw the activity the bot got ripped to shreds? I think paid Russian propaganda trolls are still common on this website. But I think I can tell when those two people are taking a break. This thread dies down a lot.

Although I do think that both Russian and Chinese bot activity will pick up. I've seen a lot of Software Developer Kit activity as of late from Russian and Chinese state universities. But given how badly Russian propaganda has devolved, I don't think it will be anytime soon?

Simonyan (aka "Margo the Beaver"): "They want to take our beloved Crimea from us, and we are doing the only thing we can do in such a situation: we are bombing them! We bomb them daily, everything that moves. How did we want this? I know for sure that our management did not want it. Putin is shedding tears in his soul, but he has to bomb."
https://www.reflex.cz/clanek/profil/119043/jefim-fistejn-bobrozroutka-margo-aneb-pohledna-bohata-a-krute-prolhana-tvar-putinovy-propagandy.html

"Russian President Vladimir Putin declared last week that beer in Prague, where a summit between Kremlin critics recently took place, contains “female sex hormones”"
https://news.yahoo.com/former-moscow-officials-reveal-why-025231101.html

Yeesh.

You call out a bot anytime anyone disagrees with you, or as much as doesn't share your fervor for the Ukrainian cause. On top of that is your nonstop cosplay as a thread police.

What I read? Blah, blah, blah. In the meantime, please enjoy this article of Russia's shrinking island..

"Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin and a delegation of his colleagues went to China this week with the hopes of further enhancing economic ties with Beijing."
"But Mishustin’s counterpart, the Chairman of the State Council Li Qiang, who invited him on the visit, reportedly refused to meet with him at the China-Russia Business Forum on Tuesday, according to Russian newspaper Vedomosti."
"Other top officials and managers of major Chinese companies also declined to meet with him and his colleagues, many of whom are sanctioned in the West due to Russia’s war in Ukraine, Vedomosti reported."
"Mishustin is the highest-ranking Russian official to visit Beijing since Russia launched its invasion in 2022."
“Even those big businessmen who wanted and were ready to speak publicly were not allowed to meet by the authorities—they don’t want to take even the smallest risk,”
"Other inconveniences reportedly cropped up during the trip as well. One Chinese currency exchange post refused to convert $100 for yuan for one of the Russian officials on the trip, since he shares the name of someone sanctioned."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/russian-prime-minister-gets-awkward-185935895.html

"Alexander Shiplyuk, head of Siberia's Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ITAM), is suspected of handing over classified material at a scientific conference in China in 2017, the sources said."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-russian-hypersonic-scientist-accused-102000357.html

I'm sure that stung but not as bad as this:

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/12/entertainment/zelensky-eurovision-speech-intl-scli/index.html#:~:text=A%20request%20by%20Ukrainian%20President,has%20been%20denied%20by%20broadcasters.

A request by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to address the Eurovision Song Contest final in the English city of Liverpool on Saturday has been denied by broadcasters.

In a statement posted on its website on Thursday, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which is an alliance of public service media organizations that oversees the event, stressed the importance of the “nonpolitical” nature of Eurovision, which is watched by millions around the world.

[Anonymous]

You must send more money to Ukraine.

What you are sending is NOT enough.

More is needed. You need to pay this money even if you need to take on more debt to do so.

Nothing is more important to America.