|
As a parent with kids in MCPS schools, I've been watching the news about the AI cameras being piloted in some of our high schools and honestly I'm a little creeped out
Students seem to feel that way too — the Montgomery County Sentinel ran a piece yesterday quoting students pushing back because they feel surveilled in their own hallways. https://www.thesentinel.com/communities/new-mcps-ai-security-cameras-are-being-installed-in-schools/article_2c7bdd30-8fc8-4512-82b7-175b5d5f61ac.html But beyond privacy, AI gets things wrong in ways that can be genuinely traumatic. Just last fall, a student at a Baltimore County high school was surrounded by eight police cars, forced to his knees, and handcuffed — because the AI mistook a crumpled bag of Doritos for a gun. A bag of chips. That happened here in Maryland. https://www.wbaltv.com/article/student-handcuffed-ai-system-mistook-bag-chips-weapon/69114601 So, why did MCPS pick this pilot program less than 3 months later? Is that really the best option for school safety? About a month ago the MoCo Show covered how students at Sherwood HS traveled to Capitol Hill to advocate for Alyssa's Law — legislation that would connect schools directly to law enforcement through silent panic alarms. Ten states have passed it. Maryland hasn't. And as far as I can tell, none of our major districts have adopted wearable panic buttons for staff, which let teachers quietly call for help if they see something, whether it's a threat, a medical emergency, anything. Cameras that watch hallways — and apparently can't tell a Doritos bag from a firearm — aren't the same as giving teachers an actual tool to get help. And with budgets tightening across the district, I think that its pretty important to ask if AI surveillance is the best use of our school funds. Curious if other MCPS parents are thinking about this too. |
| You realize there are security cameras everywhere you go. You have no privacy outside your home. |
It's the AI cameras that mistake chip bags for guns, or some other misread, that the OP has raised as a concern. Read the post again, and you see how you go from being surveilled, to be surveilled by an AI camera that triggers an alert to the police to surround a student who didn't have a gun, but rather, a crumpled Dorito chips bag. What other mistakes does an AI camera make? Possibilities are numerous. That is the problem. How much is Taylor open spending on this new technology? |
| Seems hasty. I like the idea of teachers and staff having silent alarm buttons |
|
Can't find how much the pilot cost, but a different Banner article mentioned: "School leaders in nearby Loudoun County recently signed a five-year contract with VOLT AI, set to be reviewed each year. It cost $1.1 million for the first year, The Washington Post reported."
https://www.thebanner.com/education/k-12-schools/ai-powered-weapons-detection-montgomery-schools-wootton-HX2I2EI5YZC2NAK4OMDITQX2PU/ |
|
I would definitely prioritize the silent panic buttons, which have saved lives in multiple incidents.
I hate AI but I'm not totally opposed to this idea, if it's used properly as a tool rather than replacement for human judgment. Like if the AI can send an alert that says "there may be a fight brewing in the A hallway outside room 315" and then security guards can go take a look -- that seems fine and a helpful way to maybe direct limited human resources. A police officer TRUSTING AI when it says "this kid has a gun!" seems really dumb since AI is wrong so often. If AI says "this kid has a gun" seems like the reasonable thing would be for an officer to approach and say "Hi, Larlo, can I check your backpack please?" with another officer there as backup. |