Susie Wiles
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| She may be the only somewhat rational head in the room. If cancer treatment sidelines her things are about to get worse. Much worse. |
Anonymous
| I wish her the best on her treatment and recovery, but she is not at all a moderating influence. |
Anonymous
| Looks like they caught the cancer early. If he's pardoning J6ers and going to war with her there, what would it be like without her? |
Anonymous
I’m sure an unchecked Stephen Miller can come up with worse. I do think she controls him somewhat. |
Anonymous
I think she probably a moderating influence. Logically, she could not get to where she is without some brains. Even for Trump - she pretty much won this election for him. She is the brains of everything that is his and as much as I hate him, he kinda has a lot which is why we all hate him 
I really like her. I don't know anything about her but insofar as she has ability and is good at what she does, I respect her for that. There's a lot of people in life who I may like personally but who I feel are fools as well. I may not like her personally but she ain't no fool. I'm just edgy like that I guess - I do not have the stomach to suffer fools but I can respect someone who I totally disagree with. Trump on the other hand is a fool that deserves to go to hell
|
Anonymous
|
People often think a woman is a moderating influence.
Melania… Ivanka… None really were. |
Anonymous
Not anymore. Trump listened to her during the campaign, but now he's President, he listens to no moderating influence, and she knows it. She's just standing aside and letting the most evil clowns drive the bus. |
Anonymous
| Also, Elon stole the election for him. Wiles didn’t do much. |
Anonymous
Have you not seen the people who have risen in this administration? 🤔 |
Anonymous
I’m tired of hearing this. Nothing we have seen or heard indicates that there is anyone remotely rational in the room. |
Anonymous
|
She is NOT a moderating influence.
She has openly stated that her job is to enable Trump, not act as checks and balances. That’s why she still has her job. |
Anonymous
Disagree. Hellscape 1.0 seemed not nearly as bad as Hellscape 2.0. I think that is due in part to JaVanka. |
Anonymous
Come on! If she is rational then Trump is sane! She is as despicable as trump and I have as much sympathy for her as I will have for trump when he dies. Both will descend to the underworld. |
Anonymous
100 percent. She has survived BECAUSE she does not try to control Trump in any way, unlike his COS and other advisors in his first term. She implements his wishes and stays out of his way. The Vanity Fair article about her and the others in Trump's inner WH circle has a lot of interesting insights and is not behind a paywall: "Vance described Wiles’s approach to the chief’s job. “There is this idea that people have that I think was very common in the first administration,” he told me, “that their objective was to control the president or influence the president, or even manipulate the president because they had to in order to serve the national interest. Susie just takes the diametrically opposite viewpoint, which is that she’s a facilitator, that the American people have elected Donald Trump. And her job is to actually facilitate his vision and to make his vision come to life.” https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/trump-susie-wiles-interview-exclusive-part-1?srsltid=AfmBOorelNTfpbNGrCK82Reuh98gf06rmAZKb6oBHdLSHQ2pIttTK05M |
Anonymous
You don’t know her to like or dislike her. Parasocial relationships are ruining society. |