Palantir CEO says AI will make Democrat women poor and make male laborers rich
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”
These poeple are lunatics. https://newrepublic.com/post/207693/palantir-ceo-karp-disrupting-democratic-power |
Anonymous
|
Is that a threat? Or a challenge?
Men may get consumed with AI porn more than women. So. |
Anonymous
| When the trades are over saturated then what??? |
Anonymous
When no one can afford what trades people are selling, then what. Ai can tell me how to do a lot of handyman sruff. |
Anonymous
| Alex Karp is an ass. |
Anonymous
| It will only help healthy strong men until they put the AI into robots. then we'll all be useless. |
Anonymous
|
I think he is just hallucinating.
He is right about one thing though, someone who actually does something productive will have more economic power than some academia loon exploring gender theories or oppression of minorities. |
Anonymous
| He’s as bad as Musk. We need to reel these delusional folks in. |
Anonymous
There is a certain hierarchy, but referring to people that learn and teach things about humanity as “loons” certainly tells us a lot about you. |
Anonymous
It’s funny. Technology was supposed to free humans to pursue higher pursuits like humanities, arts, and research. Now it turns out that AI is taking those roles, and relegating humans to manual labor. And CEO’s call this progress. |
Anonymous
| I hope that AI sex is worth it |
Anonymous
DP. “Loon” might be an unnecessary dig, but I agree those humanities people are in trouble. The thing is, the money that ever gave those people well paying jobs in the first place was artificial, and it now it is gone. There is someone I know, unemployed for a year, who I was trying to help with a referral. I saw her LinkedIn and literally the first thing on there was the “she/her” pronouns and then all the other woke stuff. This is a middle aged NoVA white woman. I want to tell her, take those out, it’s not 2022 anymore. You need to focus on your transferable skills and frame yourself differently. I majored in something even more worthless on the job market than humanities, which now I think was better than humanities because I was forced to pivot and gain skills early on and I’m doing really well now. |
Anonymous
I’m fine with manual labor if we can all do it 20 hours a week. |
Anonymous
| I really don't agree with the idea that the humanities will suffer more than manual laborers and tradesman. Where in the world do you get this idea from? Anything black and white, with clear right and wrong, can be more easily replaced by AI and robotics. This includes many STEM fields but also trades, maybe with the exception of highly artistic trades (maybe some unique woodworking, for example). It will be the fields that are more nuanced, that make full use of our humanity, that can survive. And humanities is the study of what makes us human. How can AI do that, when it is not human? So yes, i still tend to see it as innovation will free us from grinding daily labor to focus on artistic, "high" pursuits. Not that I think this is a great world because not everyone is capable of high pursuits and most humans who have ever lived have made a living based off grinding work, but I just think this scenario is more likely than the one with humans doing trades. |
Anonymous
|
|