The repeal of the Endangerment Finding.

[Anonymous]

Say goodbye to clean air.

Trump goons have accomplished yet another Project 2025 goal. They'll get sued, of course, but I'll be long dead by the time this is litigated, by which time it will be way too late to actually do anything about climate change.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/climate/trump-epa-greenhouse-gases-climate-change.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LlA.utJ6.esSaFp9yT47E&smid=url-share

[Anonymous]

They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

[Anonymous]

My outrage meter is busted from overuse.

Don't the GOP breathe? Don't their children and grandchildren breathe?

Failing to "believe" in climate change doesn't change the facts.

The GOP will die of cancer too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

I pray. And pray and pray ....

[Anonymous]

The irony of an administration that made the MAHA movement doing this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

true, but the damage done in the meantime for humanity will not be pleasant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

true, but the damage done in the meantime for humanity will not be pleasant.

Trump is on his last lap and doesn’t care. Especially if he can collect a few more bribes in exchange for the revocation.

[Anonymous]

Q: What do you tell Americans who are concerned that repealing the endangerment finding comes at a host to public health and the environment based on science?

TRUMP: I tell them don't worry about it. This was all a scam. They'll have more money to spend for healthcare.

[Anonymous]

I keep picturing Dr. Evil with his pinkie raised to his lips.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

true, but the damage done in the meantime for humanity will not be pleasant.

It’ll get stuck in litigation, and the next admin will just stop defending the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

true, but the damage done in the meantime for humanity will not be pleasant.

Trump is on his last lap and doesn’t care. Especially if he can collect a few more bribes in exchange for the revocation.

It’s not even as if the man is in his 30s and has decades left to live and benefit from all the bribery and grift. I can’t imagine he’s doing any of this to help his kids. What’s in it for him, really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

true, but the damage done in the meantime for humanity will not be pleasant.

Trump is on his last lap and doesn’t care. Especially if he can collect a few more bribes in exchange for the revocation.

It’s not even as if the man is in his 30s and has decades left to live and benefit from all the bribery and grift. I can’t imagine he’s doing any of this to help his kids. What’s in it for him, really?

He doesn't see any downside - according to him the recent cold weather is evidence that global warming is a hoax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

true, but the damage done in the meantime for humanity will not be pleasant.

It’ll get stuck in litigation, and the next admin will just stop defending the case.

That is not how it works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

true, but the damage done in the meantime for humanity will not be pleasant.

Trump is on his last lap and doesn’t care. Especially if he can collect a few more bribes in exchange for the revocation.

It’s not even as if the man is in his 30s and has decades left to live and benefit from all the bribery and grift. I can’t imagine he’s doing any of this to help his kids. What’s in it for him, really?

He doesn't see any downside - according to him the recent cold weather is evidence that global warming is a hoax.

One, he hates Obama. This was his baby.
Two, he hates wind and solar.
Three, he does actually think regulation is bad and climate change is a hoax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be in charge much longer. This isn’t permanent.

true, but the damage done in the meantime for humanity will not be pleasant.

It’ll get stuck in litigation, and the next admin will just stop defending the case.

That is not how it works.

It is, actually.