Alienation of affection

[Anonymous]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/top-senator-accused-druggy-affair-203853446.html

I honestly think the women who go after married men know they are not going to held accountable to the extent a man would. She knows his wife won't come after her.

[Anonymous]

“are you having an affair with my husband? You took a married man away from his family.”. Ill admit I was surprised when I saw that line.

[Anonymous]

What are these grown people doing? Does she think she is Whitney and he is Kevin? The Bodyguard 2.0

[Anonymous]

What is the point of ‘going after’ an affair partner? If You think you can buy your spouse’s loyalty by filing lawsuits against mistresses then you are wasting your energy - she needs to let go of that spouse. She talks about him like he’s a child. It’s creepy. That said women who date married men are generally crazy and probably have daddy issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is the point of ‘going after’ an affair partner? If You think you can buy your spouse’s loyalty by filing lawsuits against mistresses then you are wasting your energy - she needs to let go of that spouse. She talks about him like he’s a child. It’s creepy. That said women who date married men are generally crazy and probably have daddy issues.

As a man I think you make very good points. Most women don't generally have problems finding a single man.

[Anonymous]

Marriage is a contract. It’s a publicly available contract.

If you break a contract or you aided somebody in breaking a contract, those somebodies should be sued for what breaking that contract cost the offended partyand pain and suffering just like every other contract.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marriage is a contract. It’s a publicly available contract.

If you break a contract or you aided somebody in breaking a contract, those somebodies should be sued for what breaking that contract cost the offended partyand pain and suffering just like every other contract.

If you breach, sure. But if you aren't married, you have no contract to breach. The idea that the non-married AP has some sort of duty to care for the party being cheated on is a wild overreach. The cheater is the liable party. Anybody going after an AP is an idiot. Go after the person you have a contract with, sure. Who they breached with is immaterial (unless it's, like, your sibling or something egregious). That they breached is the relevant matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marriage is a contract. It’s a publicly available contract.

If you break a contract or you aided somebody in breaking a contract, those somebodies should be sued for what breaking that contract cost the offended partyand pain and suffering just like every other contract.

Ugh, the last thing our court system needs is to get even more clogged up with angry spouses suing each other.

Also, you’d have to prove financial damages. What are you gonna sue for, the $100 your husband spent on dinner for their AP? This is already handled in divorce in marital resources were spent on an affair, no need to add suing into the mix.

Suing also implies ownership and that’s just gross. Nobody belongs to anybody. It’s not like a business where somebody steals a thing (money).

The only thing that’ll happen is people who are already abusive and vindictive will use it to punish the other person. Toxic people will hire PIs and make fake setups. No fault divorce exists for this very reason, so people can have a clean break without having to destroy each other in court.

I say this as someone who was cheated on multiple times by someone who did waste marital resources. It’s just not worth it. Move on with your life and find peace. Too many people stay stuck and just want revenge.

[Anonymous]

When I look at that woman I see a home wreaker and a cheater. She just gives that vibe. I am happy the woman is going after her just to embarrass her. It won't go beyond embarrassment. We hope we never ever see that POS in the Senate again.

[Anonymous]

I am totally okay with these laws, though only a handful of states still have them on the books.

There is a civil analogue of tortious interference with contract.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When I look at that woman I see a home wreaker and a cheater. She just gives that vibe. I am happy the woman is going after her just to embarrass her. It won't go beyond embarrassment. We hope we never ever see that POS in the Senate again.

The person who "wrecked" the home is the person who took a vow to be loyal to the person they made that home with.

[Anonymous]

My ex took his AP on a very expensive vacation while we were married. That was joint money. You bet I wish I could sue both of them. Plus she knew he was married. I blame them both equally.
What's funny is after I kicked him to the curb she thought he would marry her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Marriage is a contract. It’s a publicly available contract.

If you break a contract or you aided somebody in breaking a contract, those somebodies should be sued for what breaking that contract cost the offended partyand pain and suffering just like every other contract.

If you breach, sure. But if you aren't married, you have no contract to breach. The idea that the non-married AP has some sort of duty to care for the party being cheated on is a wild overreach. The cheater is the liable party. Anybody going after an AP is an idiot. Go after the person you have a contract with, sure. Who they breached with is immaterial (unless it's, like, your sibling or something egregious). That they breached is the relevant matter.

There are plenty of states that disagree with you. Also you don’t have to sign a contract to violate a contract.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I look at that woman I see a home wreaker and a cheater. She just gives that vibe. I am happy the woman is going after her just to embarrass her. It won't go beyond embarrassment. We hope we never ever see that POS in the Senate again.

The person who "wrecked" the home is the person who took a vow to be loyal to the person they made that home with.

Women keep talking that to themselves while other women freely go after their husbands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marriage is a contract. It’s a publicly available contract.

If you break a contract or you aided somebody in breaking a contract, those somebodies should be sued for what breaking that contract cost the offended partyand pain and suffering just like every other contract.

You can't "aid someone in breaking a contract" that YOU didn't sign. That's not a thing.