Physicians Assistant yelling “HELP ME” while stealing a CitiBike ?

[Anonymous]

I had a similar situation once, not going to get into it (too hard to explain). But bottom line, an African woman (from Africa, acccent) accused me of cutting her in line. I argued back, defended myself. And then I realized holy cr*p, I could end up being the next person on the internet.

After the situation was over my daughter went up to the woman and APOLOGIZED TO HER because of our "privilege". !!!

I was so angry and frightened when I left that store I was shaking. My take aways,
1 Just let the person of color do/have/say what they want. Do not engage. No place in line or bike rental is worth it.
2 even my own child, who had witnessed that I had NOT cut the line, has been brainwashed by woke culture to side with the "victim" of color. Even though she knows me and knows I am not "like that".

There will be no positivie outcome; just kowtow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DM quotes her lawyer as saying, "But there is no animosity towards the men in the video. We frankly wish them the best in the future. The focus is clearing her name and going after the publications and high profile names that defamed her."

She's a better woman than me. I would be suing the ever living HELL out of them. And that might actually dissuade some of this vile behavior in the future

I mean she could but come on … she’s not getting any money from those guys. Can’t collect a judgment from people who are out here trying to steal rental bikes.

Two people fighting over who can rent the last e-bike. Both parties claim that they reserved the e-bike. Both parties acted terribly in this case. And, unfortunately for the PA there’s no coming back from this incident. She will always be remembered as the “unhinged” Karen who was fighting with black teens over the last e-bike.

Monique Judge will always be remembered as the vacuous and malicious middle-aged woman who had her retirement accounts drained in a defamation lawsuit.

I’m not sure who she is other than some loudmouth on Twitter but something tells me she doesn’t have a lot of money to lose in a defamation lawsuit either … any settlement will be against the news outlets, similar to that Catholic school kid from the Midwest who was visiting DC and who had a “confrontation” with an activist caught on video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRENPxbQ/

The lawyer is an employment lawyer trying to help her keep her job. His “receipts” aren’t actually receipts at all. He’s trying to control the narrative.

Monique needs to stop digging her self in because she makes herself more liable with every post. Of course the lawyer redacted the location of the receipt, he did that to protect the PA from more aggression. Her argument that a well-respected lawyer would fake receipts is ludicrous.

Right!!? She didn’t even realize the lawyer was giving her an out in the defamation case by giving her a chance to back down. Too bad, so sad.

Her videos/posts make my blood boil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had a similar situation once, not going to get into it (too hard to explain). But bottom line, an African woman (from Africa, acccent) accused me of cutting her in line. I argued back, defended myself. And then I realized holy cr*p, I could end up being the next person on the internet.

After the situation was over my daughter went up to the woman and APOLOGIZED TO HER because of our "privilege". !!!

I was so angry and frightened when I left that store I was shaking. My take aways,
1 Just let the person of color do/have/say what they want. Do not engage. No place in line or bike rental is worth it.
2 even my own child, who had witnessed that I had NOT cut the line, has been brainwashed by woke culture to side with the "victim" of color. Even though she knows me and knows I am not "like that".

There will be no positivie outcome; just kowtow.

This. If someone crazy guy is threatening people in public, only intervene if he is white. Everyone is on their own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRENPxbQ/

The lawyer is an employment lawyer trying to help her keep her job. His “receipts” aren’t actually receipts at all. He’s trying to control the narrative.

Monique needs to stop digging her self in because she makes herself more liable with every post. Of course the lawyer redacted the location of the receipt, he did that to protect the PA from more aggression. Her argument that a well-respected lawyer would fake receipts is ludicrous.

Right!!? She didn’t even realize the lawyer was giving her an out in the defamation case by giving her a chance to back down. Too bad, so sad.

Yep. In fact I appreciate this lawyer for giving her an out and also for saying he’s not going after the four men.

Monique needs to hire her own lawyer at this point, because she’s facing a lawsuit. Her own lawyer would tell her to can her racist nonsense about white women’s tears when a woman is defending herself, and to stop libeling the PA.

[Anonymous]

I want to address the question raised as to why the nurse doesn't say "I rented this bike, I was here first," in the video.

The answer at the beginning of the video is very simple: everyone there knew already.

If her account is correct that she got on the bike and unlocked it, and then the guys came and pushed her back into the dock, she had no reason to explain to them that she had rented the bike. There was no misunderstanding -- everyone there had seen her on the bike with the bike unlocked, so she doesn't need to explain it to them.

Now, what she doesn't know in that moment is that this video will wind up on the internet and seen by thousands if not millions of people who actually don't know that, and that many of them will demand to know why she doesn't explain it to them. But she has no idea these people's opinions will ever matter -- she doesn't make her case to them because she doesn't even know they will eventually exist.

Now, later, after the guy has rented the bike (at the :20 second mark of the video) and the other hospital employee came up, why doesn't she ALSO pull out her phone to say she rented the bike? Well my read on it is that she wants the altercation to be over, and when the hospital colleague unsuccessfully suggests they redock the bike and the guys refuse and reiterate it's "his" bike, she gives up. There are so many of them, they will not back down, and she is tired and wants to go home.

Imagine if you worked 12 hours and then dealt with nonsense like this, only to have every facial expression and choice you made in that 90 second video parse and doubted and attacked by a bunch of strangers on the internet. The idea that we don't owe this woman some grace and benefit of the doubt is offensive (I also extend some grace and benefit of the doubt to the guys, some of whom don't even seem to want to take the bike from her, and others who I think don't understand how obnoxioius/offensive their behavior is).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I want to address the question raised as to why the nurse doesn't say "I rented this bike, I was here first," in the video.

The answer at the beginning of the video is very simple: everyone there knew already.

If her account is correct that she got on the bike and unlocked it, and then the guys came and pushed her back into the dock, she had no reason to explain to them that she had rented the bike. There was no misunderstanding -- everyone there had seen her on the bike with the bike unlocked, so she doesn't need to explain it to them.

Now, what she doesn't know in that moment is that this video will wind up on the internet and seen by thousands if not millions of people who actually don't know that, and that many of them will demand to know why she doesn't explain it to them. But she has no idea these people's opinions will ever matter -- she doesn't make her case to them because she doesn't even know they will eventually exist.

Now, later, after the guy has rented the bike (at the :20 second mark of the video) and the other hospital employee came up, why doesn't she ALSO pull out her phone to say she rented the bike? Well my read on it is that she wants the altercation to be over, and when the hospital colleague unsuccessfully suggests they redock the bike and the guys refuse and reiterate it's "his" bike, she gives up. There are so many of them, they will not back down, and she is tired and wants to go home.

Imagine if you worked 12 hours and then dealt with nonsense like this, only to have every facial expression and choice you made in that 90 second video parse and doubted and attacked by a bunch of strangers on the internet. The idea that we don't owe this woman some grace and benefit of the doubt is offensive (I also extend some grace and benefit of the doubt to the guys, some of whom don't even seem to want to take the bike from her, and others who I think don't understand how obnoxioius/offensive their behavior is).

I don’t extend any grace to the young men. If her story is true, they deliberately harassed her and set her up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRENPxbQ/

The lawyer is an employment lawyer trying to help her keep her job. His “receipts” aren’t actually receipts at all. He’s trying to control the narrative.

Monique needs to stop digging her self in because she makes herself more liable with every post. Of course the lawyer redacted the location of the receipt, he did that to protect the PA from more aggression. Her argument that a well-respected lawyer would fake receipts is ludicrous.

Right!!? She didn’t even realize the lawyer was giving her an out in the defamation case by giving her a chance to back down. Too bad, so sad.

Yep. In fact I appreciate this lawyer for giving her an out and also for saying he’s not going after the four men.

Monique needs to hire her own lawyer at this point, because she’s facing a lawsuit. Her own lawyer would tell her to can her racist nonsense about white women’s tears when a woman is defending herself, and to stop libeling the PA.

+1, it's very clear that she and her lawyer are simply trying to lower the temperature and restore her name, and if the media outlets that printed false narrative would just issue retractions and an apology, and Judge would simply start minding her own business instead of constantly issuing threats online, this whole thing would be over, this woman could go back to work, etc.

The thing is, Judge is getting a lot of attention for her antics and no doubt the website that is posting her drivel is getting clicks (and ad revenue). So they are motivated to keep going even though it's quite obvious Judge got this one very, very wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I want to address the question raised as to why the nurse doesn't say "I rented this bike, I was here first," in the video.

The answer at the beginning of the video is very simple: everyone there knew already.

If her account is correct that she got on the bike and unlocked it, and then the guys came and pushed her back into the dock, she had no reason to explain to them that she had rented the bike. There was no misunderstanding -- everyone there had seen her on the bike with the bike unlocked, so she doesn't need to explain it to them.

Now, what she doesn't know in that moment is that this video will wind up on the internet and seen by thousands if not millions of people who actually don't know that, and that many of them will demand to know why she doesn't explain it to them. But she has no idea these people's opinions will ever matter -- she doesn't make her case to them because she doesn't even know they will eventually exist.

Now, later, after the guy has rented the bike (at the :20 second mark of the video) and the other hospital employee came up, why doesn't she ALSO pull out her phone to say she rented the bike? Well my read on it is that she wants the altercation to be over, and when the hospital colleague unsuccessfully suggests they redock the bike and the guys refuse and reiterate it's "his" bike, she gives up. There are so many of them, they will not back down, and she is tired and wants to go home.

Imagine if you worked 12 hours and then dealt with nonsense like this, only to have every facial expression and choice you made in that 90 second video parse and doubted and attacked by a bunch of strangers on the internet. The idea that we don't owe this woman some grace and benefit of the doubt is offensive (I also extend some grace and benefit of the doubt to the guys, some of whom don't even seem to want to take the bike from her, and others who I think don't understand how obnoxioius/offensive their behavior is).

I kept thinking she probably already said it before they started filming. And they probably didn’t care. Why keep repeating it if they’re just going to continue harassing you?

I seriously hope an anvil falls on that Monique woman’s head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:#Citibike KAREEM was probably expecting someone to gift him the world's most expensive bike of his very own or at least a lifetime voucher for a Citibike.

#Citibike KAREEM

Stop trying to make fetch happen.

DP. Not sure about #Citibike KAREEM and anyway “Citibike PA” does the job already.

But we do need a label for this behavior of trying to destroy an innocent person’s life on social media for sh!ts and giggles. I posted earlier that names and labels have power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRENPxbQ/

The lawyer is an employment lawyer trying to help her keep her job. His “receipts” aren’t actually receipts at all. He’s trying to control the narrative.

Monique needs to stop digging her self in because she makes herself more liable with every post. Of course the lawyer redacted the location of the receipt, he did that to protect the PA from more aggression. Her argument that a well-respected lawyer would fake receipts is ludicrous.

Right!!? She didn’t even realize the lawyer was giving her an out in the defamation case by giving her a chance to back down. Too bad, so sad.

Yep. In fact I appreciate this lawyer for giving her an out and also for saying he’s not going after the four men.

Monique needs to hire her own lawyer at this point, because she’s facing a lawsuit. Her own lawyer would tell her to can her racist nonsense about white women’s tears when a woman is defending herself, and to stop libeling the PA.

+1, it's very clear that she and her lawyer are simply trying to lower the temperature and restore her name, and if the media outlets that printed false narrative would just issue retractions and an apology, and Judge would simply start minding her own business instead of constantly issuing threats online, this whole thing would be over, this woman could go back to work, etc.

The thing is, Judge is getting a lot of attention for her antics and no doubt the website that is posting her drivel is getting clicks (and ad revenue). So they are motivated to keep going even though it's quite obvious Judge got this one very, very wrong.

A lawsuit would take this income away, and more.

Can a judgment against her bar her from social media? I have no idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRENPxbQ/

The lawyer is an employment lawyer trying to help her keep her job. His “receipts” aren’t actually receipts at all. He’s trying to control the narrative.

Monique needs to stop digging her self in because she makes herself more liable with every post. Of course the lawyer redacted the location of the receipt, he did that to protect the PA from more aggression. Her argument that a well-respected lawyer would fake receipts is ludicrous.

Right!!? She didn’t even realize the lawyer was giving her an out in the defamation case by giving her a chance to back down. Too bad, so sad.

Yep. In fact I appreciate this lawyer for giving her an out and also for saying he’s not going after the four men.

Monique needs to hire her own lawyer at this point, because she’s facing a lawsuit. Her own lawyer would tell her to can her racist nonsense about white women’s tears when a woman is defending herself, and to stop libeling the PA.

+1, it's very clear that she and her lawyer are simply trying to lower the temperature and restore her name, and if the media outlets that printed false narrative would just issue retractions and an apology, and Judge would simply start minding her own business instead of constantly issuing threats online, this whole thing would be over, this woman could go back to work, etc.

The thing is, Judge is getting a lot of attention for her antics and no doubt the website that is posting her drivel is getting clicks (and ad revenue). So they are motivated to keep going even though it's quite obvious Judge got this one very, very wrong.

A lawsuit would take this income away, and more.

Can a judgment against her bar her from social media? I have no idea.

No, but a settlement might require her to agree to issue an apology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:#Citibike KAREEM was probably expecting someone to gift him the world's most expensive bike of his very own or at least a lifetime voucher for a Citibike.

#Citibike KAREEM

Hahahaha! This is SO CLEVER. It’s like Karen, but then you turned it into KAREEM, because he’s black!

[Anonymous]

Who posted the video originally?

The young men in the video don't seem to have come forward or spoken up at all since the video went viral, nor have they had a representative speak for them that I can find.

And the Monique woman seems to be sticking to her view that the PA was in the wrong. She is still retweeting comments and posting as of 10 hours ago that she doesn' believe the receipts and that this was a racist act perpetrated against the young men.

[Anonymous]