https://electrek.co/2025/10/24/texas-power-demand-surges-solar-wind-and-storage-carry-the-load/ The interesting thing is solar, wind and batteries are eating in to the natural gas generation. Most of the projected growth(14%) next year is being driven by data centers and bitcoin mining. The tariffs are killing farmers in Texas. Many farmers are losing $800 an acre with farming but can sign a 20 year lease for $200 an acre for solar. Of course the Texas legislature is pushing bills to outlaw solar and wind but the lobbying money is not having it. |
| Now if only the MAGA federal government would support the same.... |
https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/solar/texas-solar-battery-records How much wind, solar or batteries grid power could have been produced for 7.2 billion? |
Yes, T Boone Pickens got Texas government to implement massive subsidies for solar and wind. It is why the grid is not as reliable as before. At least Texas still has low gas prices. |
| New York passed a green energy law, requiring regulations to be passed two years ago describing how they would get the reduced CO2 emissions. The state agency didn't write any regulation, and was sued. In the case, the state said the regulations would cause an increase in prices by 35%, in the cheapest scenario that didn't even reach the target in the law. |
False - the grid in Texas is MORE reliable than it was, thanks to wind and solar. https://communityimpact.com/austin/north-central-austin/government/2025/11/13/ercot-forecasts-stable-texas-power-grid-this-january/ |
New York’s climate law doesn’t mandate a 35% price hike, and there’s no statute, regulation, or court ruling that says that. Nor was there any finding by New York regulators of a 35% price hike as a result of enacting the regulation. The CLCPA sets emission targets, not utility bills. Transition costs are debated, but the law is about cutting pollution, not forcing rate spikes. The only place the 35% number came from was from fossil-fuel-linked organizations touting questionable worst-case scenarios. |
lol if they had more renewables their energy the bill would be lower but they don’t. New York's utility-scale electricity generation mix in 2024 Natural Gas: 48.7% Hydroelectric: 21.3% Nuclear: 20.6% Wind: 4.6% Solar: 2.6% Biomass: 1.2% Petroleum: 0.3% The more natural gas and fossil fuel used the higher the rate. Also underground power line and old infrastructure(specially around NYC) cost money. So you are saying onshore wind in New York at 4.6% of the power grid at $0.03-$0.08 per kWh and solar(Cider Solar Farm) at 2.6%, $0.04-$0.08 per kWh is the driving cost? NG at $0.07-$0.14 per kWh is 48.7%. Nope just does not add up when you look at the numbers. Seems you are just talking out your a$$. |