Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Texas increased its power supply by 35% over the last four years, 90% met with solar, wind and batteries."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]New York passed a green energy law, requiring regulations to be passed two years ago describing how they would get the reduced CO2 emissions. The state agency didn't write any regulation, and was sued. In the case, the state said the regulations would cause an increase in prices by 35%, in the cheapest scenario that didn't even reach the target in the law.[/quote] lol if they had more renewables their energy the bill would be lower but they don’t. New York's utility-scale electricity generation mix in 2024 Natural Gas: 48.7% Hydroelectric: 21.3% Nuclear: 20.6% Wind: 4.6% Solar: 2.6% Biomass: 1.2% Petroleum: 0.3% The more natural gas and fossil fuel used the higher the rate. Also underground power line and old infrastructure(specially around NYC) cost money. So you are saying onshore wind in New York at 4.6% of the power grid at $0.03-$0.08 per kWh and solar(Cider Solar Farm) at 2.6%, $0.04-$0.08 per kWh is the driving cost? NG at $0.07-$0.14 per kWh is 48.7%. Nope just does not add up when you look at the numbers. Seems you are just talking out your a$$. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics