How is Candace Owen a better journalist than 99% of traditional media

[Anonymous]

Like she is always on top of the newest idea/theory. I am seeing other channels on the CK discussion who called her crazy now realize she was right a few days later and don't have the courage to admit it.

Candice Owens needs a pulitzer/emmy for her work. There is evidence coming out that the shooter had a female accomplice guiding him. FBI has the video but isn't releasing it. FBI also has the footage of the shooter setting up on the roof but isn't showing it, they only oublished him running off. Some odd stuff is going on and Candice is the only person talking about? Where is NBC, where CBS? Where is the media????

[jsteele]

Owens is a little crazy and probably shouldn't be trusted. She claimed in a recent video that Kirk was killed because the folks at Jezebel paid someone on Etsy to put a hex on him. Keep in mind that she is currently being sued by the Macrons because of her repeated claims that Brigitte is transgender.

She is good at spinning a story and generating clicks, but it is exceedingly premature to be nominating her for any prizes.

[Anonymous]

Even a broken clock is right twice a day

[Anonymous]

Candace Owens claims new source told her that Tyler Robinson was never at UVU. This pretty much destroys the narrative we are being spoon fed by the FBI

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Even a broken clock is right twice a day

Why would you believe that she is right in this case?

[Anonymous]

Well why doesn't the FBI just dispell all the rumors? All the supposed "consipiracy" theories by Candace Owens? They have the footage of the shooter setting up and being mounted on the roof and dissambleing the weapon? Why not release it all? Why release the footage of him just running away?


Oh right because the same FBI that said there is no "Epstien List" a few weeks ago is less trusted than Candace Owens. That's how bad things are.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:Owens is a little crazy and probably shouldn't be trusted. She claimed in a recent video that Kirk was killed because the folks at Jezebel paid someone on Etsy to put a hex on him. Keep in mind that she is currently being sued by the Macrons because of her repeated claims that Brigitte is transgender.

She is good at spinning a story and generating clicks, but it is exceedingly premature to be nominating her for any prizes.

This is being polite. She’s a nutter. (Bright, but certifiable)

[Anonymous]

Candace has admitted that her own judgement is flawed. Her brain doesn't work correctly. Why would anybody care about what she has to say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Like she is always on top of the newest idea/theory. I am seeing other channels on the CK discussion who called her crazy now realize she was right a few days later and don't have the courage to admit it.

Candice Owens needs a pulitzer/emmy for her work. There is evidence coming out that the shooter had a female accomplice guiding him. FBI has the video but isn't releasing it. FBI also has the footage of the shooter setting up on the roof but isn't showing it, they only oublished him running off. Some odd stuff is going on and Candice is the only person talking about? Where is NBC, where CBS? Where is the media????

Real journalists prioritize fact-checking and getting things right over being "on top of the newest theory."

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Well why doesn't the FBI just dispell all the rumors? All the supposed "consipiracy" theories by Candace Owens? They have the footage of the shooter setting up and being mounted on the roof and dissambleing the weapon? Why not release it all? Why release the footage of him just running away?


Oh right because the same FBI that said there is no "Epstien List" a few weeks ago is less trusted than Candace Owens. That's how bad things are.

Actually, the FBI should not release evidence before a trial because that would prejudice potential jurors and possibly leading to acquittal of the suspect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Candace has admitted that her own judgement is flawed. Her brain doesn't work correctly. Why would anybody care about what she has to say?

She is an opportunist. This was her good friend and colleague at one point but didn't have the decency and/or was too ashamed to attend his memorial.

[Anonymous]

^Or what if they are framing this guy TR. He has yet to admit guilt. What if they are framing this innocent guy?

The rifle the shooter used would have left and entry and exit wound. It didn't!!

Why show the footage camera footage from the other bldg. on the roof of him running away but him not setting up taking aim? Why not show the footagw of him dissassembling the weapon?

Let transparancy speak for itself.

[Anonymous]

At least she is exposing all the flaws in the government's presentation of what happened to Charlie Kirk.

I don't see this happening anywhere else on mainstream media. She is just asking the same questions any sane citizen should be asking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well why doesn't the FBI just dispell all the rumors? All the supposed "consipiracy" theories by Candace Owens? They have the footage of the shooter setting up and being mounted on the roof and dissambleing the weapon? Why not release it all? Why release the footage of him just running away?


Oh right because the same FBI that said there is no "Epstien List" a few weeks ago is less trusted than Candace Owens. That's how bad things are.

Because that would be the tail wagging the dog. If the FBI goes out of its way to dispel every rumor about a high profile case, then all they'd do is give press conferences saying "this totally unsubstantiated theory you saw on YouTube is not true." The best way to handle conspiracy theories is to ignore them while affirmatively releasing actual verified facts.

The shooting was two weeks ago. It does not actually makes sense that the public would have the full story at this point because there has not been time to actually track down every detail and verify it, and they shouldn't be releasing unverified details. Also, yes, as Jeff pointed out, they have to be careful about what the release at this stage because they are preparing for trial and they want to make sure their case is air tight and that jurors aren't completely ruined by tons of online speculation as they've released little details here and there. They need to pull the entire picture together first.

Candace Owens is exploiting your desire to know everything and know it immediately. She's filling the void. That doesn't make her wild conspiracy theories correct. It makes them conveniently available to you whereas the truth remains shrouded. But you aren't in charge of investigating this case. So you will have to actually wait while the paid investigators do their jobs, at a reasonable pace that moves at the speed of the justice system, not the tabloid press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well why doesn't the FBI just dispell all the rumors? All the supposed "consipiracy" theories by Candace Owens? They have the footage of the shooter setting up and being mounted on the roof and dissambleing the weapon? Why not release it all? Why release the footage of him just running away?


Oh right because the same FBI that said there is no "Epstien List" a few weeks ago is less trusted than Candace Owens. That's how bad things are.

Because that would be the tail wagging the dog. If the FBI goes out of its way to dispel every rumor about a high profile case, then all they'd do is give press conferences saying "this totally unsubstantiated theory you saw on YouTube is not true." The best way to handle conspiracy theories is to ignore them while affirmatively releasing actual verified facts.

The shooting was two weeks ago. It does not actually makes sense that the public would have the full story at this point because there has not been time to actually track down every detail and verify it, and they shouldn't be releasing unverified details. Also, yes, as Jeff pointed out, they have to be careful about what the release at this stage because they are preparing for trial and they want to make sure their case is air tight and that jurors aren't completely ruined by tons of online speculation as they've released little details here and there. They need to pull the entire picture together first.

Candace Owens is exploiting your desire to know everything and know it immediately. She's filling the void. That doesn't make her wild conspiracy theories correct. It makes them conveniently available to you whereas the truth remains shrouded. But you aren't in charge of investigating this case. So you will have to actually wait while the paid investigators do their jobs, at a reasonable pace that moves at the speed of the justice system, not the tabloid press.

Let me guess. You also believe Epstein killed himself?