Proud to be a Washingtonian

[Anonymous]

Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

[Anonymous]

Weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

It's sad that you think criminals whose behavior results in innocent victims' deaths shouldn't receive meaningful consequences for their actions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

It's sad that you think criminals whose behavior results in innocent victims' deaths shouldn't receive meaningful consequences for their actions.

Huh? None of the non-indicted killed anybody, weirdo.

[Anonymous]

Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

[Anonymous]

"First even politicized DOJ" is laughable. nobody believes this garbage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

You just repeated her words, so they can’t be THAT unacceptable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

Have you ever picked up a US history book in your life.

[Anonymous]

o k

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

It's sad that you think criminals whose behavior results in innocent victims' deaths shouldn't receive meaningful consequences for their actions.

Huh? None of the non-indicted killed anybody, weirdo.

Did an Uber driver die? Carjackers get punished?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

.

Agree the woman’s post was appalling but apparently there was no evidence to show intention beyond the disgusting post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

.

Agree the woman’s post was appalling but apparently there was no evidence to show intention beyond the disgusting post.

I think that even the SS determined that there was no intention or ability.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

.

Agree the woman’s post was appalling but apparently there was no evidence to show intention beyond the disgusting post.

PP you replied to. Well, as long as we're willing to treat someone who threatens Democratic Presidents in the same way, I'm good. If it's just words and no intent, OK. I feel like she should have had a fine or something. For mouthing off

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

It's sad that you think criminals whose behavior results in innocent victims' deaths shouldn't receive meaningful consequences for their actions.

Huh? None of the non-indicted killed anybody, weirdo.

Did an Uber driver die? Carjackers get punished?

The issue there was not a failure of the grand jury to indict.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

It's sad that you think criminals whose behavior results in innocent victims' deaths shouldn't receive meaningful consequences for their actions.

Huh? None of the non-indicted killed anybody, weirdo.

Did an Uber driver die? Carjackers get punished?

Did you read the article this thread is actually about?