NCAP North
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Looks like they have seceded from NCAP. What's the story? |
Anonymous
| Don’t know the reason, but it was a franchise like Burke and Alexandria. It seemed to be a pretty small site comparatively. |
Anonymous
| Yeah, never was a large NCAP contingent in MD. |
Anonymous
| They will not be missed. |
Anonymous
| This was always a very weak site. |
Anonymous
| The overhead to ncap outweighed the benefits |
Anonymous
| Please tell us more. Are we talking about the GP site? |
Anonymous
Nope, a few practice groups in Rockville. Seems like an amicable split, because the new team is advertised right on the NCAP North team unify. |
Anonymous
| Question: If swimmers from North decide to move to another NCAP site, I assume that does not trigger the [120 day?] rule? Will the rule apply to swimmers who stay at this site and laterally join this renamed, new club? |
Anonymous
| Sounds like they got sick of paying the franchisee fee. How much did they pay NCAP corporate per year for branding rights? |
Anonymous
This. |
Anonymous
Even if they have to swim unattached while they wait out the 120 days it is not a big deal. Points at club meets are stupid and only for the egos of a few coaches. |
Anonymous
You wish. That is not happening. Keep ringing your hands, your wishes will not come true. |
Anonymous
You ok? You sound triggered... Maybe time to touch grass. |
Anonymous
If they move to a different NCAP site it does not trigger the 120 day rule. |