No human being is illegal

[Anonymous]

Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?

[Anonymous]

Because it’s a lie. That’s like saying no one is a criminal. Yes, humans can be illegal aliens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?

It's not "getting lost". It's that a vast majority of Americans don't actually buy it.

Nearly every country has a border that they enforce.

-Never voted for Trump

[Anonymous]

First you have to make them seem not human...

Hitler playbook

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?

It's not "getting lost". It's that a vast majority of Americans don't actually buy it.

Nearly every country has a border that they enforce.

-Never voted for Trump

A lie or you actually can't vote here

[Anonymous]

It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?

If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?

It's not "getting lost". It's that a vast majority of Americans don't actually buy it.

Nearly every country has a border that they enforce.

-Never voted for Trump

A lie or you actually can't vote here

So your thesis is that everyone who has never voted for Trump thinks the USA should have ope n bo rders?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?

It's not "getting lost". It's that a vast majority of Americans don't actually buy it.

Nearly every country has a border that they enforce.

-Never voted for Trump

A lie or you actually can't vote here

So your thesis is that everyone who has never voted for Trump thinks the USA should have ope n bo rders?

No

That's quite the pretzel statement you made. Typical Trumper

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?

If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?

Semantics matter

Never read dystopian literature?
Never studied history?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?

If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?

How about saying "undocumented" instead? When you get down to it the distinction is whether or not they have a birth certificate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?

If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?

How about saying "undocumented" instead? When you get down to it the distinction is whether or not they have a birth certificate.

Because this is a lie. Most of those people do have birth records from their country. They do have documents from their country, either driving license, birth certificate or passport, so they are not undocumented.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?

If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?

Stop using logic and common sense. You are supposed to only feel about the issue. Do not use your mind so that you can be triggered to protest against our great nation enforcing its laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?

If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?

Semantics matter

Never read dystopian literature?
Never studied history?

Here comes liberal arts barista who failed algebra class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?

If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?

How about saying "undocumented" instead? When you get down to it the distinction is whether or not they have a birth certificate.

Most people from Oregon and New Hampshire use the term Sans-doc when referring to undocumented immigrants. I think it's appropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?

If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?

But that’s seriously dehumanizing, don’t you agree?