The Kane Show (Part 4)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He has a Range Rover and a Audi. He bought the Audi for Nat and took it away after their relationship went sour. Nat has the van now.

Yup, its true. Thats why she was so upset when she slipped and fell on the ice & was knocked unconscious....she said in her IG comments from that blog post that he stole the Audi away from her & even though he knew a blizzard was coming and her van sucks in the snow & isn't safe he still kept both 4wheel drive cars from her, a new Range Rover & what was her new Audi. Hes lucky the kids werent with her when her van got stuck in the snow & she had to try to get it out on an icy driveway. I know we all give her shit about slamming the father of her kids but I'm proud of her that she finally told some of what really happened between them. What is wrong with this man?? "Family Man" of the year.

Oh boo hoo. So she only has one nice car instead of two? And it couldn't be driven on one of the three snow days we had this year? Talk about entitled.

It's not about being entitled, its about safety. Its just a fact.
I hardly think a Honda Odyssey (which guessing by their kids' ages is at least 5 or 6 years old) is a "nice new car". Practical yeah, but hardly the luxury status of the other two. How do you defend that he just sits on the two new cars THEY bought together? Those two cars he has are over $100k worth of cars, for one man. It screams cliche middle aged narcissist man. He cries that she took all of their money but somehow he's been able to afford both cars still. Oh and we had a blizzard that more than a foot of snow. I'm guessing you dont live in the area or your blind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kane is a major asshole. I think deep down he is not a very happy person, that's why he does all those things. Goes to show that money doesn't bring you true happiness.

Eh I think he's just a dick, but he's happy. Unfortunately, lol.

He's the insecure fat kid who just wants to be liked. He's the funny teddy bear. He miraculously landed the gorgeous girl and forgot that when he started treating her like crap, the funny teddy bear would become very unappealing.

Signed,
An insecure fat kid who just wants to be liked and doesn't always treat SO with the love they deserve.

I get it.

+1000000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On Sarah's podcast this week she said the reason why she left TKS was because Kane secretly recorded audio of her and hid it for 7 months. When she discovered it he said it was accidental. She then left bc she didn't trust him. Very shady. Think he was waiting to blackmail her when an opportune moment came up?

This is entirely creepy and inappropriate.

DC is a "one party consent" law, which means so long as one person in the conversation (Kane) consents, he can record. I don't know how that applies if he was recording her in a conversation with someone else, but the whole thing stinks.

Kane has serious issues with women.

I don't know if it matters (don't know what MD's laws are), but the recording was probably happening at their studios in MD, not DC proper.

ETA: looks like MD is a two-party consent state.. http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations

So Sarah busted Kane and he claims it was an "accident." Sure it was. She can't prove it otherwise, I'd guess. He's a creep.

Reminds me of a PP's argument that anyone could've registered the domain of Mel's name with Kane's info. Yeah, I'm sure that's what happened. His need for control is alarming.

It makes you wonder what he has on Nat. If he was doing it at work, he was doing it at home.

Kane has said before that he had a comprehensive video surveillance system at his house. You can even see some of the screen grabs on his social media (one time IJ mooned one of the cameras). He said it was for security, but he probably looked at the cameras to check up on Natasha, too. He said in his divorce announcement that he pulled the camera footage and saw Natasha's friend come over to help her leave.

Didn't he say at some point that she had covered the cameras? I think it was when the alarm went off and she wasn't answering his calls.

if that's the case, it sounds like she knew he watched the cameras.

She knew, he's a controlling narcissist. I'm a friend of the family and I know that she found out he was watching her constantly during the times HE had the kids. He was obsessed with watching her even though she wasn't dating anyone. (while he brags on Tinder about the twenty something strippers he's swiping on) So yeah, she covered them because she's trying to be free. Trying to start her own life apart from him.

That's beyond creepy. She should have had those cameras ripped out the second he moved out. So he filed but also wants to watch her every move? That's like some movie of the week ish right there.

[Anonymous]

Seems like someone who knows Natasha and Kane personally is trolling this forum. Spill the beans or save your breath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He has a Range Rover and a Audi. He bought the Audi for Nat and took it away after their relationship went sour. Nat has the van now.

Yup, its true. Thats why she was so upset when she slipped and fell on the ice & was knocked unconscious....she said in her IG comments from that blog post that he stole the Audi away from her & even though he knew a blizzard was coming and her van sucks in the snow & isn't safe he still kept both 4wheel drive cars from her, a new Range Rover & what was her new Audi. Hes lucky the kids werent with her when her van got stuck in the snow & she had to try to get it out on an icy driveway. I know we all give her shit about slamming the father of her kids but I'm proud of her that she finally told some of what really happened between them. What is wrong with this man?? "Family Man" of the year.

Oh boo hoo. So she only has one nice car instead of two? And it couldn't be driven on one of the three snow days we had this year? Talk about entitled.

It's not about being entitled, its about safety. Its just a fact.
I hardly think a Honda Odyssey (which guessing by their kids' ages is at least 5 or 6 years old) is a "nice new car". Practical yeah, but hardly the luxury status of the other two. How do you defend that he just sits on the two new cars THEY bought together? Those two cars he has are over $100k worth of cars, for one man. It screams cliche middle aged narcissist man. He cries that she took all of their money but somehow he's been able to afford both cars still. Oh and we had a blizzard that more than a foot of snow. I'm guessing you dont live in the area or your blind.

we definitely had A LOT of snow. That being said, of course he can afford cars - he has a job! HE bought the cars when they were together, yes. Maybe when the divorce is finalized she will end up getting one of them back, maybe she won't be entitled to one or want one. But the thing is, whether she took his money at the time or not, he has been steadily working so yes of course he has money for cars and whatever else he needs/wants. That's the point of working.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems like someone who knows Natasha and Kane personally is trolling this forum. Spill the beans or save your breath.

Yup, what do you want to know?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wow. He is a jerk.

that is some next level crazy sh**.

Let's not forget that he stole Little Pink Monster...you have no idea...

[Anonymous]

Where was Nat going anyway? It's a bad idea to drive on snow and ice in your own driveway -- something you have complete control over. Hire someone to clear it, *then* go to the craft store.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like someone who knows Natasha and Kane personally is trolling this forum. Spill the beans or save your breath.

Yup, what do you want to know?

We could start with the real reason for the divorce, what really happened during the car accident where she hid a piece of the car in the trunk, and whether Kane has an addiction of some sort.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like someone who knows Natasha and Kane personally is trolling this forum. Spill the beans or save your breath.

Yup, what do you want to know?

We could start with the real reason for the divorce, what really happened during the car accident where she hid a piece of the car in the trunk, and whether Kane has an addiction of some sort.

Well that certainly clammed up the person "in the know" hahahahahaha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like someone who knows Natasha and Kane personally is trolling this forum. Spill the beans or save your breath.

Yup, what do you want to know?

We could start with the real reason for the divorce, what really happened during the car accident where she hid a piece of the car in the trunk, and whether Kane has an addiction of some sort.

Well that certainly clammed up the person "in the know" hahahahahaha.

I just figured the person in the know was Danni who is bored at home and had some extra time on her hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like someone who knows Natasha and Kane personally is trolling this forum. Spill the beans or save your breath.

Yup, what do you want to know?

We could start with the real reason for the divorce, what really happened during the car accident where she hid a piece of the car in the trunk, and whether Kane has an addiction of some sort.

Shes a good person & I'm actually pretty in awe of how much she's kept private so I dont want to do or say anything to jeopardize that since she's in the middle of disaster divorce. My sister is one of her best friends so I dont think she'll mind that I clarify the car accident. She was coming home at night & was trying to get up their driveway. The snow was already cleared but it was piled over a foot high on each side of the driveway (they have a long driveway and no street parking so she had to try and get to the house) As she was driving up there was a patch of black ice on the driveway and her car slid backwards at an angle and two tires were stuck in the piled up snow. thats when she tried to get out on foot and slipped on the ice. my sister was completely terrified for her, its not everyday you have a friend who lays unconscious on their driveway, bleeds all over and then goes to the hospital in an ambulance. we didnt even know what hospital she was in for hours. she ended up at two hospitals and my sister told me he never even inquired if she was ok. she had two friends that he knew were there and he didnt ask them anything, like "is the mother of my children that i was married to for almost a decade ok?/'he didnt come to the hospital, he didnt even ask if she was ok. instead he used it as an opportunity to spread lies & use the fall (which probably would not have happened if shes using of their two 4 wheel drive cars) against her in the divorce. who does that?? he even told people in our circle that she was out driving drunk and got in an accidnent at the gas station where she had to call the ambulance. until pictures showed up, then he quickly shut up abou tit. not to mention Natasha doesnt drink...like at all. shes a really good person and im so sick of seeing/hearing people say awful things about her. also 99% of what he says are lies. hes sic.

[Anonymous]

I used to think Kane/Peter was such a nice family guy, and now I'm seeing that it was all an act. Wow.

[Anonymous]

^if your sister is actually one of her best friends, it won't be that hard for Natasha to figure out who you are and honestly I'm not sure if she'd appreciate you posting her private business on here. Then again, she did say almost all of this on her blog so carry on I guess.

[Anonymous]

Ok, but the pp was actually inquiring about the accident she had where she put a piece of the car in the trunk and hid it from him or whatever. They also asked you about the possibility of him having an addiction.