Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Oh wow. Page 6 has some more snark

https://pagesix.com/2025/06/08/celebrity-news/entitled-blake-lively-blasted-for-horrible-behavior-on-shopping-outing/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who knew a judge’s ruling was the end all be all on this sub forum. Page after page of whining over how Johnny Depo dodged accountability and “won” in court only because he was the more famous A-lister with all the connections. The whiners continue to call Johnny an abusive sociopath. Same dynamic here: Blake and notably her husband are A-listers with exponentially more wealthy and Hollywood connections. Blake gets a court “win” and we’re supposed to forget she and her husband manufactured this hoax from thin air?

This forum has more lawyers per capita and many of us are interested in the legal case, not a particular side. This is a big deal for us, we're nerds.

You've repeated this line for months ("forum with the most lawyers and journalists per capita") and I believed it since I'm fairly new here, yet I'm a journalist, and in the past, when I asked for other reporters' input on some elements of this case, there were crickets, lol. With the exception of one poster who magically was a "fact checker" in the past.

DP but PP above didn’t say “the most lawyers and journalists” above, she just said lawyers.

Whatever, she's always said some variation of that line, and just like she's wrong about the amount of journalists, she's also probably wrong about the amount of lawyers on here, too.

DP but I’ve been on this thread for months and people in the thread have been commenting since the beginning that there are an outsized number of lawyers (or people who claim they are lawyers) in the thread compared to a regular thread, and that seems correct to me. Not sure re journalists. YMMV.

Stop spamming your bullshit disinformation. None of the spamming losers are successful attorneys.

And yet they correctly predicted dismissal.

Yes, it was always an uphill battle. That doesn’t absolve these hoax scam artists. Just as OJ wasn’t innocent.

Huh, I don't remember it being called an uphill battle when the JB side was insisting BL should immediately settle these cases for tens of millions.

Right? Where has this person been for the last four months of discussion Baldoni’s supposedly strong and persuasive claims worth $400M? It was not discussed by Baldoni supporters as an “uphill battle.” They have been urging Luvely to settle for tens of millions of dollars and a statement of contrition for months.

Wow. NAG on Reddit going nuts on a lively supporter who she says lies. Honestly the lively person sounds like this poster above

This is from NAG. She is livid!!

I wonder if Lauren lurks here too?

https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/s/rDfRlEjEvO

I don't disagree with NAG's criticism of that poster, but all the swearing and yelling comes off as a meltdown to me. It is not professional. If you are going to hold yourself out as a legal expert who can explain these issues to lay people, which she does, you are sometimes get harsh criticism. I think she needs to grow a thicker skin or get offline because you can't flip out like this every time someone is rude to you.

Oh I totally disagree! She’s normally so professional but she is clearly pissed. Did you hear her? It wasn’t one post by ‘Lauren’. She had been doing it for months and LYING!!

I heard her. The cursing and shouting comes off crazy. She's a litigator, right? I would not be enthused to see my lawyer unhinged like this over some nasty, unfair criticism.

It would have been much more impressive if she'd dismantled the nasty poster's flimsy arguments in a calm, controlled way. This makes her look crazy, sorry.

LOL it’s not like she was in court!! She’s a bad ass. And she did address ‘Lauren’s’ substantive comments. Basically showing this BL supporter is a bald faced liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh wow. Page 6 has some more snark

https://pagesix.com/2025/06/08/celebrity-news/entitled-blake-lively-blasted-for-horrible-behavior-on-shopping-outing/

This is from the article in page 6. PR folks, what do you make of this? It seems like yesterday was such a good day for her. Why does she ruin things by acting dumb in public?

——
Entitled” Blake Lively was blasted by a fan for the “horrible” way she treated employees at a store in New York City. On Saturday, a fan named Landon took to TikTok to share what occurred when she was out shopping at Stoney Clover Lane while the “Gossip Girl” alum was also there. “It was honestly a horrible experience. I don’t know how she has any fans anymore,” the netizen, who was out shopping with her mom and sister, told her more than 197,000 followers.”

[Anonymous]

https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/s/tk8BAS9HxI

What do you all think of this? It’s that Reddit sub on this, and people are upset because they sense there is too much PR manipulation.

——-
“So they must be watching this sub closely. If they are reading through this sub...I want them to know -

I hate Blake.... organically. Used to be a very big fan of the couple, their birthday posts, Met Gala outfits. Everything changed post their NYT article and Kjersti flaa video.

PR team should respect the fans..not fool them. I am very upset, after being fooled over and over again.

They could've just apologized, we would have forgiven and forgotten. But no...they decide to drag and today PR wants to post in this sub to SHOW OFF!

How much more do u want us to endure? Haven't u done enough....?

Organically, Ex-fan”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who knew a judge’s ruling was the end all be all on this sub forum. Page after page of whining over how Johnny Depo dodged accountability and “won” in court only because he was the more famous A-lister with all the connections. The whiners continue to call Johnny an abusive sociopath. Same dynamic here: Blake and notably her husband are A-listers with exponentially more wealthy and Hollywood connections. Blake gets a court “win” and we’re supposed to forget she and her husband manufactured this hoax from thin air?

This forum has more lawyers per capita and many of us are interested in the legal case, not a particular side. This is a big deal for us, we're nerds.

You've repeated this line for months ("forum with the most lawyers and journalists per capita") and I believed it since I'm fairly new here, yet I'm a journalist, and in the past, when I asked for other reporters' input on some elements of this case, there were crickets, lol. With the exception of one poster who magically was a "fact checker" in the past.

DP but PP above didn’t say “the most lawyers and journalists” above, she just said lawyers.

Whatever, she's always said some variation of that line, and just like she's wrong about the amount of journalists, she's also probably wrong about the amount of lawyers on here, too.

DP but I’ve been on this thread for months and people in the thread have been commenting since the beginning that there are an outsized number of lawyers (or people who claim they are lawyers) in the thread compared to a regular thread, and that seems correct to me. Not sure re journalists. YMMV.

Stop spamming your bullshit disinformation. None of the spamming losers are successful attorneys.

And yet they correctly predicted dismissal.

Yes, it was always an uphill battle. That doesn’t absolve these hoax scam artists. Just as OJ wasn’t innocent.

Huh, I don't remember it being called an uphill battle when the JB side was insisting BL should immediately settle these cases for tens of millions.

Right? Where has this person been for the last four months of discussion Baldoni’s supposedly strong and persuasive claims worth $400M? It was not discussed by Baldoni supporters as an “uphill battle.” They have been urging Luvely to settle for tens of millions of dollars and a statement of contrition for months.

Wow. NAG on Reddit going nuts on a lively supporter who she says lies. Honestly the lively person sounds like this poster above

It’s probably the same person.

It's not. I kind of like NAG and I don't leave mean comments on people's personal social media accounts like TikTok. I leave that for Baldoni supporters to do on Lively's posts or the posts of people who are supportive to her. Crazy, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who knew a judge’s ruling was the end all be all on this sub forum. Page after page of whining over how Johnny Depo dodged accountability and “won” in court only because he was the more famous A-lister with all the connections. The whiners continue to call Johnny an abusive sociopath. Same dynamic here: Blake and notably her husband are A-listers with exponentially more wealthy and Hollywood connections. Blake gets a court “win” and we’re supposed to forget she and her husband manufactured this hoax from thin air?

This forum has more lawyers per capita and many of us are interested in the legal case, not a particular side. This is a big deal for us, we're nerds.

You've repeated this line for months ("forum with the most lawyers and journalists per capita") and I believed it since I'm fairly new here, yet I'm a journalist, and in the past, when I asked for other reporters' input on some elements of this case, there were crickets, lol. With the exception of one poster who magically was a "fact checker" in the past.

DP but PP above didn’t say “the most lawyers and journalists” above, she just said lawyers.

Whatever, she's always said some variation of that line, and just like she's wrong about the amount of journalists, she's also probably wrong about the amount of lawyers on here, too.

DP but I’ve been on this thread for months and people in the thread have been commenting since the beginning that there are an outsized number of lawyers (or people who claim they are lawyers) in the thread compared to a regular thread, and that seems correct to me. Not sure re journalists. YMMV.

Stop spamming your bullshit disinformation. None of the spamming losers are successful attorneys.

And yet they correctly predicted dismissal.

Yes, it was always an uphill battle. That doesn’t absolve these hoax scam artists. Just as OJ wasn’t innocent.

Huh, I don't remember it being called an uphill battle when the JB side was insisting BL should immediately settle these cases for tens of millions.

Right? Where has this person been for the last four months of discussion Baldoni’s supposedly strong and persuasive claims worth $400M? It was not discussed by Baldoni supporters as an “uphill battle.” They have been urging Luvely to settle for tens of millions of dollars and a statement of contrition for months.

Wow. NAG on Reddit going nuts on a lively supporter who she says lies. Honestly the lively person sounds like this poster above

It’s probably the same person.

It's not. I kind of like NAG and I don't leave mean comments on people's personal social media accounts like TikTok. I leave that for Baldoni supporters to do on Lively's posts or the posts of people who are supportive to her. Crazy, right?

DP. How do you know it’s not a pro BL on here? I thought there were lots of Blake posters on DCUM

[Anonymous]

If I were Lively, I wouldn't touch It Starts With Us with a 10 foot pole, if that were an option. I guess leave that for Baldoni, if Hoover will work with him again, which I guess no will know until the conclusion of this lawsuit. If it's successful, it gives him more credibility.

Have a hard time seeing Sony help him distribute it, though, especially if he's going to be pulling Sony into this lawsuit through his contractual claims. Not sure what Baldoni's future as a director in Hollywood is going to be if he ropes Sony into this crazy lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who knew a judge’s ruling was the end all be all on this sub forum. Page after page of whining over how Johnny Depo dodged accountability and “won” in court only because he was the more famous A-lister with all the connections. The whiners continue to call Johnny an abusive sociopath. Same dynamic here: Blake and notably her husband are A-listers with exponentially more wealthy and Hollywood connections. Blake gets a court “win” and we’re supposed to forget she and her husband manufactured this hoax from thin air?

This forum has more lawyers per capita and many of us are interested in the legal case, not a particular side. This is a big deal for us, we're nerds.

You've repeated this line for months ("forum with the most lawyers and journalists per capita") and I believed it since I'm fairly new here, yet I'm a journalist, and in the past, when I asked for other reporters' input on some elements of this case, there were crickets, lol. With the exception of one poster who magically was a "fact checker" in the past.

DP but PP above didn’t say “the most lawyers and journalists” above, she just said lawyers.

Whatever, she's always said some variation of that line, and just like she's wrong about the amount of journalists, she's also probably wrong about the amount of lawyers on here, too.

DP but I’ve been on this thread for months and people in the thread have been commenting since the beginning that there are an outsized number of lawyers (or people who claim they are lawyers) in the thread compared to a regular thread, and that seems correct to me. Not sure re journalists. YMMV.

Stop spamming your bullshit disinformation. None of the spamming losers are successful attorneys.

And yet they correctly predicted dismissal.

Yes, it was always an uphill battle. That doesn’t absolve these hoax scam artists. Just as OJ wasn’t innocent.

Huh, I don't remember it being called an uphill battle when the JB side was insisting BL should immediately settle these cases for tens of millions.

Right? Where has this person been for the last four months of discussion Baldoni’s supposedly strong and persuasive claims worth $400M? It was not discussed by Baldoni supporters as an “uphill battle.” They have been urging Luvely to settle for tens of millions of dollars and a statement of contrition for months.

Wow. NAG on Reddit going nuts on a lively supporter who she says lies. Honestly the lively person sounds like this poster above

It’s probably the same person.

It's not. I kind of like NAG and I don't leave mean comments on people's personal social media accounts like TikTok. I leave that for Baldoni supporters to do on Lively's posts or the posts of people who are supportive to her. Crazy, right?

DP. How do you know it’s not a pro BL on here? I thought there were lots of Blake posters on DCUM

What I'm saying is I'm the pro-Lively poster that PP said that NAG commenter sounded like, and it wasn't me. I don't know if it was some other pro-Lively poster here, though I doubt it extremely because pro-Baldoni posters are constantly accusing us of doing ridiculous conspiracy theory stuff that we simply do not do. But ymmv.

[Anonymous]

I've never posted on this thread, but here goes:

1. Fans are owed nothing. Let's not be like Korea, where they push their celebrities to suicide with their insane demands and social pressure.

2. I have no opinions on Blake Lively as an actress, but she has a right to a private life and to respectable working conditions. The two guys have been exposed as the orchestrators of a smear campaign against her, which is significantly more wrong than their initial boorish behavior on set. It's always the cover-up, not the initial crime, which trips up perpetrators! And yet they still do it...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If I were Lively, I wouldn't touch It Starts With Us with a 10 foot pole, if that were an option. I guess leave that for Baldoni, if Hoover will work with him again, which I guess no will know until the conclusion of this lawsuit. If it's successful, it gives him more credibility.

Have a hard time seeing Sony help him distribute it, though, especially if he's going to be pulling Sony into this lawsuit through his contractual claims. Not sure what Baldoni's future as a director in Hollywood is going to be if he ropes Sony into this crazy lawsuit.

WF is working with Sony right now on Eleanor the Great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've never posted on this thread, but here goes:

1. Fans are owed nothing. Let's not be like Korea, where they push their celebrities to suicide with their insane demands and social pressure.

2. I have no opinions on Blake Lively as an actress, but she has a right to a private life and to respectable working conditions. The two guys have been exposed as the orchestrators of a smear campaign against her, which is significantly more wrong than their initial boorish behavior on set. It's always the cover-up, not the initial crime, which trips up perpetrators! And yet they still do it...

With lively posters every accusation is a confession. Just substitute Vanzan and NYT for smear campaign and your point applies to lively. Justin also has a right to safe working conditions and Blake clearly created a hostile work environment for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've never posted on this thread, but here goes:

1. Fans are owed nothing. Let's not be like Korea, where they push their celebrities to suicide with their insane demands and social pressure.

2. I have no opinions on Blake Lively as an actress, but she has a right to a private life and to respectable working conditions. The two guys have been exposed as the orchestrators of a smear campaign against her, which is significantly more wrong than their initial boorish behavior on set. It's always the cover-up, not the initial crime, which trips up perpetrators! And yet they still do it...

Hello new person! I agree with you! I think a lot of people who support Lively feel the retaliation claim is really what ticks them off the most, because it's the kind of thing that probably has happened before to lots of women and we just haven't ever found out about it like we did here because of these texts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've never posted on this thread, but here goes:

1. Fans are owed nothing. Let's not be like Korea, where they push their celebrities to suicide with their insane demands and social pressure.

2. I have no opinions on Blake Lively as an actress, but she has a right to a private life and to respectable working conditions. The two guys have been exposed as the orchestrators of a smear campaign against her, which is significantly more wrong than their initial boorish behavior on set. It's always the cover-up, not the initial crime, which trips up perpetrators! And yet they still do it...

I’m new here too!

I read the NYT piece and thought Baldoni must be a terrible guy. I didn’t really think much of Blake other than she was pretty and I’d heard she was high maintenance, but whatever. RR seemed nice, albeit I always heard rumors about Hugh Jackman. MYOB though, right?

But then I started seeing things about Justin and his side and ‘receipts’, and I was shocked at how much Blake had lied and twisted facts… and it really made me angry. As women, we need to work even harder to be credible and Blake really blew it for us. Totally blew it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I were Lively, I wouldn't touch It Starts With Us with a 10 foot pole, if that were an option. I guess leave that for Baldoni, if Hoover will work with him again, which I guess no will know until the conclusion of this lawsuit. If it's successful, it gives him more credibility.

Have a hard time seeing Sony help him distribute it, though, especially if he's going to be pulling Sony into this lawsuit through his contractual claims. Not sure what Baldoni's future as a director in Hollywood is going to be if he ropes Sony into this crazy lawsuit.

WF is working with Sony right now on Eleanor the Great.

Fair point, though I'm not sure WF is doing much on EtG beyond donating money (they were seated far away from the Sony people at Cannes and didn't seem to take any pics together), and if in two weeks Freedman is actually pulling Sony further into these contract claims by, say, adding Sony as third parties to the lawsuit or even maybe requiring depositions, or whatever, then I speculate what remaining relationship WF has with Sony could further deteriorate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've never posted on this thread, but here goes:

1. Fans are owed nothing. Let's not be like Korea, where they push their celebrities to suicide with their insane demands and social pressure.

2. I have no opinions on Blake Lively as an actress, but she has a right to a private life and to respectable working conditions. The two guys have been exposed as the orchestrators of a smear campaign against her, which is significantly more wrong than their initial boorish behavior on set. It's always the cover-up, not the initial crime, which trips up perpetrators! And yet they still do it...

I’m new here too!

I read the NYT piece and thought Baldoni must be a terrible guy. I didn’t really think much of Blake other than she was pretty and I’d heard she was high maintenance, but whatever. RR seemed nice, albeit I always heard rumors about Hugh Jackman. MYOB though, right?

But then I started seeing things about Justin and his side and ‘receipts’, and I was shocked at how much Blake had lied and twisted facts… and it really made me angry. As women, we need to work even harder to be credible and Blake really blew it for us. Totally blew it.

Are you really new? You seem more like a Baldoni supporter well conversant in all the lingo who has a conspiracy theory that the other person isn't really new. Which is mean, if true. If you're really new, though, welcome.