Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books

[Anonymous]

Parents in Montgomery Count, Maryland, want to be able to opt out of instruction on gender and sexuality that they say goes against their religious convictions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/17/lgbtq-books-supreme-court-montgomery-maryland-schools-religion/

[Anonymous]

This is just the start of the next four years eroding the long-fought rights of LGBT people. What’s next? We’re only allowed to talk about the achievements of straight white men? Oh, wait.

[Anonymous]

Why do people post articles you can’t read?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do people post articles you can’t read?

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/01/17/u-s-supreme-court-to-hear-mcps-parents-lgbtq-books-opt-out-case/

[Anonymous]

Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is just the start of the next four years eroding the long-fought rights of LGBT people. What’s next? We’re only allowed to talk about the achievements of straight white men? Oh, wait.

How is this impacting their long-fought rights? What about my rights? This would be a win-win for everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.

It quickly becomes chaos. Opt kids out of evolution in biology, books in English, topics in history.

[Anonymous]

OP have you read this lawsuit in its entirety?

I have they will lose .

It is the worst written lawsuit. The lawyers on the side of the religious zealots should lose their license because of how bad they wrote their side.

It is religious garbage. Worse than that they want add religious indoctrination into public schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP have you read this lawsuit in its entirety?

I have they will lose .

It is the worst written lawsuit. The lawyers on the side of the religious zealots should lose their license because of how bad they wrote their side.

It is religious garbage. Worse than that they want add religious indoctrination into public schools.

Doesn't this court defend religious garbage, though?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.

Opting out means a teacher will never use the material. They would need to have an alternate lesson for that student and also an alternate supervised spot for them to be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Allowing opt out seems like a no brainer.

Do they just want to pretend an entire group of people don't exist?

[Anonymous]

Some things shouldn’t be discussed that at that young age in a school setting without parental permission.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just the start of the next four years eroding the long-fought rights of LGBT people. What’s next? We’re only allowed to talk about the achievements of straight white men? Oh, wait.

How is this impacting their long-fought rights? What about my rights? This would be a win-win for everyone.

Seriously? You can't figure that out?

[Anonymous]

Put all the kids from the opt out or it’s ok but I’d rather they didn’t category in one class together and woke kids in the other class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP have you read this lawsuit in its entirety?

I have they will lose .

It is the worst written lawsuit. The lawyers on the side of the religious zealots should lose their license because of how bad they wrote their side.

It is religious garbage. Worse than that they want add religious indoctrination into public schools.

Well of course it is! It's written by religious ignoramuses MAGA dorks. Not intellectuals.