Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nurse
LOL, wrong. I'm a nurse and you can bet that AI is happening in nursing
Yet you give no examples of how AI is replacing nurses...
AI might
supplement what a nurse does
but it won't replace a nurse.
Obviously.
This is what most people here don't seem to understand. M
achinery didn't replace slavery/sharecroppers, it just made it where fewer were needed for any given situation.
So while A.I. won't completely replace most fields, it WILL replace about 95% of the jobs in an average field that will benefit from the A.I. and robotics.
A current example are fast food places replacing someone at a register, with a robot kiosk. There will still be a manager to attend to kiosk/customer troubles, but now there are several less workers needed to tend the front counter.
yoooooooooo.....this is not correct....at all
The cotton gin caused the number of enslaved people to increase — and here’s why, very clearly:
The cotton gin (invented by Eli Whitney in 1793) made it much faster and easier to separate cotton fibers from seeds, especially with short-staple cotton, which could be grown across much more of the American South.
Before the cotton gin, cotton processing was so slow and labor-intensive that large-scale cotton farming wasn't practical in many regions.
After the cotton gin, cotton quickly became highly profitable. Planters expanded cotton cultivation massively across the Deep South (Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, etc.).
Even though the gin reduced labor needed to clean cotton, it dramatically increased the demand for labor to plant, cultivate, and harvest the cotton fields — which led directly to an increase in the demand for enslaved labor.
By 1860, cotton accounted for nearly 60% of U.S. exports, and the number of enslaved people in the South had exploded from about 700,000 in 1790 to nearly 4 million.