|
I’m baffled as to why Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker posted a bunch of holiday pics of their kids but blocked their baby’s face with a heart emoji. Other Kardashian family members similarly posted tons of family photos from the holidays featuring various kids but always covered that one baby’s face with a heart.
Any idea why? |
| Kid is ugly |
| I know nothing about the Kardashians but maybe it's a consent thing and the other kids are old enough to give consent to having their photos posted on social media? How old are the other kids? If tweens/teens you could argue they are old enough to understand what it means to post a photo like that online and decide if they are okay with it. |
| Many people blur out the faces of babies and young children. |
| Probably ugly. |
| Because it's a baby and unlike their other children they might want privacy/consent for that baby. |
| I really don't follow them all that closely but when their other kids were babies/toddlers, didn't Kourtney plaster their faces all over social media? So maybe this is Travis's request? |
| I think posting public photos of any minor children should be illegal so I’m the wrong person to ask. |
So your contribution to this post is ???? |
| They use the girls for attention imo. People aren't as interested in the boys so they're allowed to have privacy |
He/She gave an opinion. Welcome to DCUM!
|
|
Maybe Travis didn't want a pic of his baby, but Scott doesn't care. Scott's kids probably make money on their appearances.
Everything comes down to money. |
|
But Travis’ other kids are in the photos and their faces aren’t blurred.
And Khloe’s toddler’s face isn’t blurred. It’s just strange. |
| I think Harry and Meagan did the same with their kid for a long as they could due to ugliness. |
| Downs |