Trump wants Ann Selzer punished for her Iowa poll Predicition.

[Anonymous]

He wants her investigated for fraud.

What are we doing here?
It; 's not enough for him to win.
He needs to have question support.
He's also sicing his supporters on her.


https://nypost.com/2024/11/18/us-news/trump-slams-pollster-j-ann-selzer-whose-totally-fake-poll-showed-harris-winning-iowa-calls-for-probe/


President-elect Donald Trump slammed retiring election pollster J. Ann Selzer and called for an investigation after her last pre-Election Day survey showed Vice President Kamala Harris topping the Republican in Iowa — a state he ultimately won.

Trump slammed Selzer and the now-ridiculed Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa poll hours after she announced she was calling it quits from election polling.

Her last poll indicated Trump would lose to Harris by as much as three points in Iowa, but the future 47th president ended up winning the red state by a whopping 13 points on the way to recapturing the presidency.

[Anonymous]

What the hell does he care? He won. This man has serious issues

[Anonymous]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

That's what the first amendment heroes wanted or whatever!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He wants her investigated for fraud.

What are we doing here?
It; 's not enough for him to win.
He needs to have question support.
He's also sicing his supporters on her.


https://nypost.com/2024/11/18/us-news/trump-slams-pollster-j-ann-selzer-whose-totally-fake-poll-showed-harris-winning-iowa-calls-for-probe/


President-elect Donald Trump slammed retiring election pollster J. Ann Selzer and called for an investigation after her last pre-Election Day survey showed Vice President Kamala Harris topping the Republican in Iowa — a state he ultimately won.

Trump slammed Selzer and the now-ridiculed Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa poll hours after she announced she was calling it quits from election polling.

Her last poll indicated Trump would lose to Harris by as much as three points in Iowa, but the future 47th president ended up winning the red state by a whopping 13 points on the way to recapturing the presidency.

Give it a rest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He wants her investigated for fraud.

What are we doing here?
It; 's not enough for him to win.
He needs to have question support.
He's also sicing his supporters on her.


https://nypost.com/2024/11/18/us-news/trump-slams-pollster-j-ann-selzer-whose-totally-fake-poll-showed-harris-winning-iowa-calls-for-probe/


President-elect Donald Trump slammed retiring election pollster J. Ann Selzer and called for an investigation after her last pre-Election Day survey showed Vice President Kamala Harris topping the Republican in Iowa — a state he ultimately won.

Trump slammed Selzer and the now-ridiculed Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa poll hours after she announced she was calling it quits from election polling.

Her last poll indicated Trump would lose to Harris by as much as three points in Iowa, but the future 47th president ended up winning the red state by a whopping 13 points on the way to recapturing the presidency.

Give it a rest.

I agree Trump should give it a rest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He wants her investigated for fraud.

What are we doing here?
It; 's not enough for him to win.
He needs to have question support.
He's also sicing his supporters on her.


https://nypost.com/2024/11/18/us-news/trump-slams-pollster-j-ann-selzer-whose-totally-fake-poll-showed-harris-winning-iowa-calls-for-probe/


President-elect Donald Trump slammed retiring election pollster J. Ann Selzer and called for an investigation after her last pre-Election Day survey showed Vice President Kamala Harris topping the Republican in Iowa — a state he ultimately won.

Trump slammed Selzer and the now-ridiculed Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa poll hours after she announced she was calling it quits from election polling.

Her last poll indicated Trump would lose to Harris by as much as three points in Iowa, but the future 47th president ended up winning the red state by a whopping 13 points on the way to recapturing the presidency.

Give it a rest.

you mean trump should give it a rest. I agree

[Anonymous]

I think he is right.

Pollsters should do their best to be non biased. It definitely look like she released intentionally skewed results into order to bolster Harris’s momentum and change the media narrative for democrats to positive

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think he is right.

Pollsters should do their best to be non biased. It definitely look like she released intentionally skewed results into order to bolster Harris’s momentum and change the media narrative for democrats to positive

who cares - he would have a case if he lost. he didn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What the hell does he care? He won. This man has serious issues

Yes, but the bigger issue is that he wants to punish someone for not predicting he would win. Doesn't get anymore unAMerican than that. Does it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think he is right.

Pollsters should do their best to be non biased. It definitely look like she released intentionally skewed results into order to bolster Harris’s momentum and change the media narrative for democrats to positive

It's not constitutional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He wants her investigated for fraud.

What are we doing here?
It; 's not enough for him to win.
He needs to have question support.
He's also sicing his supporters on her.


https://nypost.com/2024/11/18/us-news/trump-slams-pollster-j-ann-selzer-whose-totally-fake-poll-showed-harris-winning-iowa-calls-for-probe/


President-elect Donald Trump slammed retiring election pollster J. Ann Selzer and called for an investigation after her last pre-Election Day survey showed Vice President Kamala Harris topping the Republican in Iowa — a state he ultimately won.

Trump slammed Selzer and the now-ridiculed Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa poll hours after she announced she was calling it quits from election polling.

Her last poll indicated Trump would lose to Harris by as much as three points in Iowa, but the future 47th president ended up winning the red state by a whopping 13 points on the way to recapturing the presidency.

Red meat for MAGA with some authoritarianism thrown in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think he is right.

Pollsters should do their best to be non biased. It definitely look like she released intentionally skewed results into order to bolster Harris’s momentum and change the media narrative for democrats to positive

That is exactly what she did, and she got caught. That's why she is retiring. Trump isn't going to do anything, and all of the whiners keep taking the bait, must be miserable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think he is right.

Pollsters should do their best to be non biased. It definitely look like she released intentionally skewed results into order to bolster Harris’s momentum and change the media narrative for democrats to positive

It's possible it was intentional. I don't know how you would prove that.

It's also possible it was an outlier.

Polls are not all supposed to be correct. If they are, they are herding (manipulating their results).

Punishing a pollster like this will only lead to more herding.

[Anonymous]

Would it change your minds if Putin made her do it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is right.

Pollsters should do their best to be non biased. It definitely look like she released intentionally skewed results into order to bolster Harris’s momentum and change the media narrative for democrats to positive

That is exactly what she did, and she got caught. That's why she is retiring. Trump isn't going to do anything, and all of the whiners keep taking the bait, must be miserable.

“Over a year ago I advised the Register I would not renew when my 2024 contract expired with the latest election poll as I transition to other ventures and opportunities,” Selzer wrote in an op-ed for the newspaper.

The final Des Moines Register poll, released the Saturday before the election, found Harris (47 percent) and Donald Trump (44 percent) neck and neck, a shocking result in a state not considered competitive. According to unofficial results, Trump won Iowa by 13 points, 56 percent to 43 percent.

“Would I have liked to make this announcement after a final poll aligned with Election Day results? Of course,” Selzer wrote. “It’s ironic that it’s just the opposite. I am proud of the work I’ve done for the Register, for the Detroit Free Press, for the Indianapolis Star, for Bloomberg News and for other public and private organizations interested in elections. They were great clients and were happy with my work.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ann-selzer-leaving-election-polling-after-iowa-whiff/ar-AA1ueOFS?ocid=BingNewsSerp