What landmark cases will get turned back with the conservative trifecta?

[Anonymous]

Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

[Anonymous]

Are white people that mad?

[Anonymous]

All of the above.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are white people that mad?

Just the ones that voted for Trump.

The rest of us are horrified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All of the above.

+1

[Anonymous]

My biggest concern is Obergefell. Not a peep about protecting that out of Harris or anyone in or running for Congress, as far as I could tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

[Anonymous]

Take a Xanax and learn how the Supreme Court works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/weekly-education/2022/05/09/will-brown-v-board-of-education-be-next-to-fall-00030923

[Anonymous]

theres also a good chance that birthright citizenship is NOT actually granted in the 14th amendment and that it was only extended to free whites and AADS. This interpretation could be challanged in the SC and it is tehir job to interpret the constitution. they could decide in the originalists favor. Latinos were routinely excluded from citizenship and even those who were eligible for birthright citizenship were also routinely deported and not considered eligible so there is some precedent for this.

I dont think/hope this will be applied retroactively but it could be. Im worried b/c im brown and my parents were beneficiaries of the immigration act of 1965, which could also get repealed.I think it is considered a HUGE mistake by most MAGA elites. even more than the voting rights act/loving/brown. even RBG said that brown was decided wrongly and the result of an activist court. ppl need to wise up and vote straight not red in the midterms so that this crazy state of affairs with no checks or balances only lasts for 2 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Roe is easy to understand if you have any sense. They did not "outlaw abortion" as people here like to say. They ruled it’s a State issue not a Federal issue, because it is. Don’t like what your State has to say about it, change it at that level. As frustrating as it is, legally it’s the correct ruling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Roe is easy to understand if you have any sense. They did not "outlaw abortion" as people here like to say. They ruled it’s a State issue not a Federal issue, because it is. Don’t like what your State has to say about it, change it at that level. As frustrating as it is, legally it’s the correct ruling.

Ok - but then how can you not apply this same principal back to most of these landmark states? Put it back on the states to determine things like brown vs board, loving, griswold, obergefell? Red states can remove all of these rights and blue states can keep them. Just like roe vs wade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Roe is easy to understand if you have any sense. They did not "outlaw abortion" as people here like to say. They ruled it’s a State issue not a Federal issue, because it is. Don’t like what your State has to say about it, change it at that level. As frustrating as it is, legally it’s the correct ruling.

Ok - but then how can you not apply this same principal back to most of these landmark states? Put it back on the states to determine things like brown vs board, loving, griswold, obergefell? Red states can remove all of these rights and blue states can keep them. Just like roe vs wade.

Not all of these situations are the same, so you need to calm down and at least do more analysis before you hyperventilate. Otherwise you won’t even make it to the next inauguration.