Loudoun schools allowing ms13 associate to attend schools

[Anonymous]

Not necessarily a member but someone associated with it https://x.com/nickminock/status/1838635402204250361?s=46&t=Rw_jX1uyupQwvEwsjuQulQ

[Anonymous]

Purcellville is full of gun-loving Trumpers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Purcellville is full of gun-loving Trumpers.

And yet none of them have joined MS-13, made death threats, or brought those guns to school.

[Anonymous]

Was he convicted? If not, what can the school do?

[Anonymous]

Children who are not in the U.S. legally can still attend school. They’re kids, they can’t help if their parents brought them here and they don’t have documentation. Let’s not go down the road of demonizing every child who doesn’t have legal documentation. Schools cannot question their status and shouldn’t.

[Anonymous]

Also the school HAS to educate the kid. Public schools can't just throw kids out.

[Anonymous]

It’s not against the law to be a gang member.

[Anonymous]

While students who are not in the U.S. legally can still attend school, this kid not only has made death threats to other students, he's also been apprehended carrying a gun to school.

Get real. This kid is a problem. Loudoun is not Montgomery County, and the parents are putting their foot down on this kid attending school with their kids. I don't blame them.

All the talk about preventing mass shootings, but y'all are reacting in a namby pamby manner because you're afraid of getting called a racist.

[Anonymous]

^^forgot to add this

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/loudoun-parents-express-safety-concerns-at-meeting-over-student-with-alleged-ms-13-ties/ar-AA1rZgI7

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While students who are not in the U.S. legally can still attend school, this kid not only has made death threats to other students, he's also been apprehended carrying a gun to school.

Get real. This kid is a problem. Loudoun is not Montgomery County, and the parents are putting their foot down on this kid attending school with their kids. I don't blame them.

All the talk about preventing mass shootings, but y'all are reacting in a namby pamby manner because you're afraid of getting called a racist.

I’m not doing anything. I don’t know anything about this kid other than what right wing media has claimed about him. But even if he is undocumented, he has a right to attend school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While students who are not in the U.S. legally can still attend school, this kid not only has made death threats to other students, he's also been apprehended carrying a gun to school.

Get real. This kid is a problem. Loudoun is not Montgomery County, and the parents are putting their foot down on this kid attending school with their kids. I don't blame them.

All the talk about preventing mass shootings, but y'all are reacting in a namby pamby manner because you're afraid of getting called a racist.

I’m not doing anything. I don’t know anything about this kid other than what right wing media has claimed about him. But even if he is undocumented, he has a right to attend school.

Seriously, I don't know what it takes for some of you to understand some basic information. Perhaps you can find a liberal news website that will tell you what a misunderstood and underpriviliged life this poor kid has had. It'll tell you to disregard the gun he brought to *middle school* or the death threats to a fellow *middle school* student. That's what you want to hear, isn't it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Children who are not in the U.S. legally can still attend school. They’re kids, they can’t help if their parents brought them here and they don’t have documentation. Let’s not go down the road of demonizing every child who doesn’t have legal documentation. Schools cannot question their status and shouldn’t.

Maybe schools should.

And also I am surprised the kid in question would even bother coming to school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Children who are not in the U.S. legally can still attend school. They’re kids, they can’t help if their parents brought them here and they don’t have documentation. Let’s not go down the road of demonizing every child who doesn’t have legal documentation. Schools cannot question their status and shouldn’t.

Maybe schools should.

And also I am surprised the kid in question would even bother coming to school.

In all seriousness, it may be a probation requirement if he has been involved in the juvenile justice system. I work in a title 1 school and am very acquainted with students like him despite the PP claiming I’m some goofy clueless liberal who thinks he’s a sweet innocent kid. He’s probably not but kids have a right to be educated even if they are legally involved, that’s just how it is. So LCPS can’t just kick him out because he’s undocumented or has had juvenile charges against him- it isn’t possible to do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Children who are not in the U.S. legally can still attend school. They’re kids, they can’t help if their parents brought them here and they don’t have documentation. Let’s not go down the road of demonizing every child who doesn’t have legal documentation. Schools cannot question their status and shouldn’t.

Maybe schools should.

And also I am surprised the kid in question would even bother coming to school.

In all seriousness, it may be a probation requirement if he has been involved in the juvenile justice system. I work in a title 1 school and am very acquainted with students like him despite the PP claiming I’m some goofy clueless liberal who thinks he’s a sweet innocent kid. He’s probably not but kids have a right to be educated even if they are legally involved, that’s just how it is. So LCPS can’t just kick him out because he’s undocumented or has had juvenile charges against him- it isn’t possible to do that.

Have your school system invite him to attend your school. Loudoun gets rid of a kid who presents a real danger and you get to rehabilitate and educate him. Win-win!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Children who are not in the U.S. legally can still attend school. They’re kids, they can’t help if their parents brought them here and they don’t have documentation. Let’s not go down the road of demonizing every child who doesn’t have legal documentation. Schools cannot question their status and shouldn’t.

Maybe schools should.

And also I am surprised the kid in question would even bother coming to school.

In all seriousness, it may be a probation requirement if he has been involved in the juvenile justice system. I work in a title 1 school and am very acquainted with students like him despite the PP claiming I’m some goofy clueless liberal who thinks he’s a sweet innocent kid. He’s probably not but kids have a right to be educated even if they are legally involved, that’s just how it is. So LCPS can’t just kick him out because he’s undocumented or has had juvenile charges against him- it isn’t possible to do that.

Have your school system invite him to attend your school. Loudoun gets rid of a kid who presents a real danger and you get to rehabilitate and educate him. Win-win!

I am in Loudoun and like I said, I teach at a school where we have quite a few legally involved students. I have had them called from my class when their PO shows up to verify attendance. It isn’t about rehabilitation but it is about a legal obligation to educate . Schools cannot just kick a kid out - they have a legal right to an education whether you like it or not. You act like LCPS can just show him the door - they can’t.