Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OJ was found not guilty too...

No one was found "not guilty" today. The judge ruled that even if Baldoni persuaded a jury that everything he was saying in his complaint was true, he would still not have proven a claim for which he could recover damages. He had no legal basis for his claims. So this would be like instead of charging OJ with murder, the prosecutor tried to charge him with embezzling from the German Chancellor, and the judge was like "uh, what? get out of my court."

You can spam as much as you want until you're blue in the fact. Blake and Ryan can piss away another few million on bots and shills and planted puff pieces in whatever tabloid rags. And the end result is you will convince literally nobody that Blake and Ryan didn't cook up this hoax to smear this man. Sorry!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OJ was found not guilty too...

No one was found "not guilty" today. The judge ruled that even if Baldoni persuaded a jury that everything he was saying in his complaint was true, he would still not have proven a claim for which he could recover damages. He had no legal basis for his claims. So this would be like instead of charging OJ with murder, the prosecutor tried to charge him with embezzling from the German Chancellor, and the judge was like "uh, what? get out of my court."

That’s not remotely right. It can both be true that Blake defamed Justin, in colloquial terms, and that her actions did not rise to the high standard we have for the cause of action of defamation.

[Anonymous]

One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Liz Plank wasn’t there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OJ was found not guilty too...

No one was found "not guilty" today. The judge ruled that even if Baldoni persuaded a jury that everything he was saying in his complaint was true, he would still not have proven a claim for which he could recover damages. He had no legal basis for his claims. So this would be like instead of charging OJ with murder, the prosecutor tried to charge him with embezzling from the German Chancellor, and the judge was like "uh, what? get out of my court."

That’s not remotely right. It can both be true that Blake defamed Justin, in colloquial terms, and that her actions did not rise to the high standard we have for the cause of action of defamation.

Uh okay if words mean just whatever I want them to mean then I think you are defaming me right now. Gimme my money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Is t Liz Plank the one Ryan Reynolds started financing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Who is Liz plank again? Is she an adult? Who says ‘lmfaoooo’? I’d expect something like that of a middle schooler

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Is t Liz Plank the one Ryan Reynolds started financing?

To answer my own question, yes, she shares a business address with VanZan, has known Reynolds longer than she has known Baldoni, and allegedly played a role in Blake being cast in the the movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Liz Plank wasn’t there.

She interacted with multiple parties during the time these events were going on. There's this very damning episode of the podcast where Baldoni spoke in vague terms about his experience with IEWU. He talks about how he was not happy with his own behavior and he had not been living up to his own ideals. He even mentions that his wife told him he should go back and read his own book. This was during the hiatus but I believe before the Jan. 4th meeting.

Plank may also have been on set some days. In the text I mentioned above, Lively says that she wanted to invite the "mutual friend" to the set but things were so unpleasant that she was glad she hadn't invited her on that particular day. She may have been there other days and she may also have information about Baldoni's state of mind toward Lively during the time when the alleged retaliation was taking place. She definitely interacted with Heath during this time, as she was recording podcast episodes with him. There is also a fascinating episode of the podcast from around the time the film came out where Heath and Plank talk about consent, and some of Heath's comments on that episode are really... interesting in light of this case. Including his comments on a story Liz tells about dating a guy who was physically violent with her and whether she had "consented" to that violence (she had not).

Plank may have been more "there" than you think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Is t Liz Plank the one Ryan Reynolds started financing?

To answer my own question, yes, she shares a business address with VanZan, has known Reynolds longer than she has known Baldoni, and allegedly played a role in Blake being cast in the the movie.

She is also the person who co-hosted the Man Enough podcast with Baldoni and Heath for several years prior to IEWU. I find it weird you'd leave that part out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares, the public and other A-listers see through this and see her and her husband are evil con artists. You're not putting that genie back in the bottle.

RR and BL have been unmasked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Is t Liz Plank the one Ryan Reynolds started financing?

To answer my own question, yes, she shares a business address with VanZan, has known Reynolds longer than she has known Baldoni, and allegedly played a role in Blake being cast in the the movie.

She is also the person who co-hosted the Man Enough podcast with Baldoni and Heath for several years prior to IEWU. I find it weird you'd leave that part out.

Because it was already mentioned upthread and the fact she currently shares a business address with a Reynolds entity was not? Unlike some of the Lively posters, I don’t feel the need to repeat what was just said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Is t Liz Plank the one Ryan Reynolds started financing?

To answer my own question, yes, she shares a business address with VanZan, has known Reynolds longer than she has known Baldoni, and allegedly played a role in Blake being cast in the the movie.

Which one of those is "financing"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OJ was found not guilty too...

No one was found "not guilty" today. The judge ruled that even if Baldoni persuaded a jury that everything he was saying in his complaint was true, he would still not have proven a claim for which he could recover damages. He had no legal basis for his claims. So this would be like instead of charging OJ with murder, the prosecutor tried to charge him with embezzling from the German Chancellor, and the judge was like "uh, what? get out of my court."

You can spam as much as you want until you're blue in the fact. Blake and Ryan can piss away another few million on bots and shills and planted puff pieces in whatever tabloid rags. And the end result is you will convince literally nobody that Blake and Ryan didn't cook up this hoax to smear this man. Sorry!

Uh almost no one actually believes this deranged theory that Blake and Ryan "cooked up a hoax" to smear Baldoni. Why? To "steal" the sequel from him? It makes no sense. In fact, it makes so little sense that Baldoni doesn't even allege this in his complaint that was just dismissed, because there is absolutely no evidence that it happened.

You will be shouting about this in your weird little corner of the internet while everyone else moves on with their lives unencumbered by silly conspiracy theories like this. Maybe join forces with the Pizzagate people if they are still kicking around, I feel like you guys would get along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One reason I think Lively may have a stronger case than some people give her credit for is that Baldoni filed a $400 million complaint with no legal basis in order to try and combat it. This indicates to me that he's pretty scared of her claims getting to a jury.

I don't know if that fear is merited, but I do think it will come down, in large part, to witness testimony, including testimony of other members of the cast and crew, Sony producers, and other witnesses to the events Lively alleges in her complaint.

And on that point, I will note that Liz Plank, who worked closely with Baldoni and Heath on their podcast for multiple years, today replied to a comment on her Instagram about today's dismissal with "lmfaooo." Plank may be a material witness in the case as it is suspected that she is the "mutual friend" who Lively texted during the early weeks of filming about Baldoni's and Heath's behavior and how she was going home crying at night because of it.

I think some JB supporters may be surprised when third parties who were there start to weigh in on what happened here.

Liz Plank wasn’t there.

She interacted with multiple parties during the time these events were going on. There's this very damning episode of the podcast where Baldoni spoke in vague terms about his experience with IEWU. He talks about how he was not happy with his own behavior and he had not been living up to his own ideals. He even mentions that his wife told him he should go back and read his own book. This was during the hiatus but I believe before the Jan. 4th meeting.

Plank may also have been on set some days. In the text I mentioned above, Lively says that she wanted to invite the "mutual friend" to the set but things were so unpleasant that she was glad she hadn't invited her on that particular day. She may have been there other days and she may also have information about Baldoni's state of mind toward Lively during the time when the alleged retaliation was taking place. She definitely interacted with Heath during this time, as she was recording podcast episodes with him. There is also a fascinating episode of the podcast from around the time the film came out where Heath and Plank talk about consent, and some of Heath's comments on that episode are really... interesting in light of this case. Including his comments on a story Liz tells about dating a guy who was physically violent with her and whether she had "consented" to that violence (she had not).

Plank may have been more "there" than you think.

Please learn what hearsay is and report back.