+1. It reminds me of the audience in a political ad. |
This. She publicly stated in the Oprah interview that she was angry at the CEO. She said her life would be better if he had publicly stated he was separated |
And Oprah is trash for giving this woman a platform to air her dysfunction. |
People trashing her are trash. |
You are mental. You don’t know anything about this woman. Stop projecting your personal issues on to strangers. |
Hey Kristin, time to grow up! |
Yeah, people should be praising her for trying to get famous off of having an affair. /s |
DP. And we don't want to know more. Her former affair partner does not seem to want to know more either. Yet she is out there seeking his and our attention. |
+1 Sick of her boohoooo story. |
| The real tragedy here, is that she is an easy and experienced but unimpressive lay. A friend of mine had her when he lived in Boston. Very similar set of circumstances, but he was more careful to be discreet. He said she was remarkably mid when you consider the amount of experience she's had. |
😀 |
I totally buy that the CEO has been carrying on affairs for years and lying to women he’s “basically separated” from his wife. So separated… he’s staying with her even after publicly humiliating her and their kids with a viral affair! He’s a bigger scumbag than this HR trainwreck and his wife is an idiot for staying with him. The CEO is skating on this because he’s rich and also because crazy projecting scorned women have seized on the lady. Takes two to tango and he had the power over the HR executive. The woman is flailing trying to control her narrative but it’s probably a lost cause. |
What species are you talking about? With humans, it's considered way more disgusting for a woman to be promiscuous than a man. This is well documented. And one of the primary reasons for obtaining power in men is for easier access to tail. In other words, everything went according to plan for the man. The woman is a disgusting tramp, probably has HPV. |
| I listened to the podcast. Maybe I'm naive, but I actually believe her for the most part. She used poor judgment but she certainly didn't deserve the amount of vitriol she received. And she's unfortunately right about women being harder on other women than they are on men. I think it's gross that her appearance was scrutinized and attacked. Plus at the end of the day, Andy Byron was the CEO-ultimately he's most at fault. |
| ^^ You are definitely naive. And she deserves the censure. |