Alec Baldwin fatally shot someone on movie set with gun mishap

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Hilaria keep posting at all?? Even about her cat? As her IG fans are going to be on the lookout for him? So ridiculous.

I think she’s addicted to attention and truly cannot see beyond how she is a victim in a given situation. She posts so that she can be seen and validated in her victim hood. I’m not sure she is acutely aware of how her own behavior comes off. I think she really thinks she is the victim here just like in the Spanish scandal. It’s kind of disturbing and most ppl who get anywhere near her content via all these messes catches onto her disturbances pretty quickly.

To be fair it must be absolutely overwhelming for her to have so many ppl think she is unwell… but as the personality disorder insists on she keeps on posting because it keeps on validating her victim hood. People critique her, call her out etc… more juice and content for how she is victimized etc…

Exactly. She posts something ridiculous and people comment on it and her default response is that internet trolls are bullying her.

Similar to this site. If one posts something others don't like the poster is called a troll. Especially if it happens to be true. For example, the Mod removed a thread the other day
which had a lot of truths. The butt hurt of course as usual hit the report button, and commented on the website thread, lol.

[Anonymous]

This very well could have happened. Or when the gun was on the cart, and was left unattended someone could have replaced a round with live.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rust-armorer-s-attorney-suggests-sabotage-may-have-led-fatal-n1283092

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This very well could have happened. Or when the gun was on the cart, and was left unattended someone could have replaced a round with live.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rust-armorer-s-attorney-suggests-sabotage-may-have-led-fatal-n1283092

Which is why it’s the responsibility of the person with the gun, to check it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This very well could have happened. Or when the gun was on the cart, and was left unattended someone could have replaced a round with live.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rust-armorer-s-attorney-suggests-sabotage-may-have-led-fatal-n1283092

Which is why it’s the responsibility of the person with the gun, to check it.

Not in that industry, that isn't the protocol.

[Anonymous]

This is a story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody. There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it. Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it. Somebody got angry about that, because it was Everybody’s job. Everybody thought Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn’t do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This very well could have happened. Or when the gun was on the cart, and was left unattended someone could have replaced a round with live.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rust-armorer-s-attorney-suggests-sabotage-may-have-led-fatal-n1283092

Which is why it’s the responsibility of the person with the gun, to check it.

Not in that industry, that isn't the protocol.

That industry does not get some magic pass on common sense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This very well could have happened. Or when the gun was on the cart, and was left unattended someone could have replaced a round with live.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rust-armorer-s-attorney-suggests-sabotage-may-have-led-fatal-n1283092

Which is why it’s the responsibility of the person with the gun, to check it.

Not in that industry, that isn't the protocol.

That industry does not get some magic pass on common sense

No but it's not the actors job to check the machines, autos, or whatever to deem safe. They have experts that are suppose to do that.
This is how it works in that industry fyi.

https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/set-prop-gun-supervisor-walks-safety-procedures-industry/story?id=80780487

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This very well could have happened. Or when the gun was on the cart, and was left unattended someone could have replaced a round with live.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rust-armorer-s-attorney-suggests-sabotage-may-have-led-fatal-n1283092

Which is why it’s the responsibility of the person with the gun, to check it.

Not in that industry, that isn't the protocol.

That industry does not get some magic pass on common sense

No but it's not the actors job to check the machines, autos, or whatever to deem safe. They have experts that are suppose to do that.
This is how it works in that industry fyi.

https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/set-prop-gun-supervisor-walks-safety-procedures-industry/story?id=80780487

Machines and autos are different. If you ever bothered to take a gun safety class you’d be told over and over to immediately check to see if a gun is loaded when it’s in your hands. No matter what anyone else says about it. It’s 100% on the guy holing the gun.

[Anonymous]

Horrific. I hope he pays dearly for this and faces jailtime. Cant stand how he's tried to make himself into a victim in all of this as well, taking attention away from the woman he killed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody. There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it. Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it. Somebody got angry about that, because it was Everybody’s job. Everybody thought Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn’t do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have.

This is cute; thanks PP. I always summarize this up in two words: Kitty Genovese

[Anonymous]

^^summarize these types of situations up. Often, no one takes care of it when multiple people are involved.


that's why when taking CPR training, one job is to point to Someone and say, "You in the blue shirt! Call 911"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody. There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it. Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it. Somebody got angry about that, because it was Everybody’s job. Everybody thought Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn’t do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have.

This is cute; thanks PP. I always summarize this up in two words: Kitty Genovese

The story you know is wrong. Her brother ( much younger) investigated and made a documentary on it.

https://www.pbs.org/independentlens/documentaries/witness/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^summarize these types of situations up. Often, no one takes care of it when multiple people are involved.


that's why when taking CPR training, one job is to point to Someone and say, "You in the blue shirt! Call 911"

Only for us regulars. Actors have different training.

[Anonymous]

Did anyone else see the hot mess of an interview with the armorer's attorneys and their theory of what happened? At the end of the day at minimum she should be charged with negligent homicide.

[Anonymous]

Angelina Jolie has weighed in with not subtle shade at Alec.https://pagesix.com/2021/11/04/angelina-jolie-on-alec-baldwin-shooting-im-careful-with-guns/

Alec came after Weinstein's victims very aggressively, and made a lot of enemies. I doubt Angie will be the last to kick him while he's down.