Can I sue Callie Oettinger?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Public money should not subsidize private schools, specifically and especially religious based institutions. You want that? Pay for it yourself. THey offer scholarships.

It's important to address misinformation and ensure a factual understanding of the issue. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that public funds can legally be used for tuition at private religious schools if they are also allowed for nonreligious private schools. This decision aligns with the use of federal funds like Pell grants and Head Start grants in private religious institutions at other educational levels. This legal precedent challenges the notion that public money should not support private religious education, showing that such funding is permissible and constitutional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Public money should not subsidize private schools, specifically and especially religious based institutions. You want that? Pay for it yourself. THey offer scholarships.

It's important to address misinformation and ensure a factual understanding of the issue. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that public funds can legally be used for tuition at private religious schools if they are also allowed for nonreligious private schools. This decision aligns with the use of federal funds like Pell grants and Head Start grants in private religious institutions at other educational levels. This legal precedent challenges the notion that public money should not support private religious education, showing that such funding is permissible and constitutional.

Just because something is technically legal does not make it right. Just look at the horrible actions by Callie.

Taxpayers will reject subsidizing Republican kids' private school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Public money should not subsidize private schools, specifically and especially religious based institutions. You want that? Pay for it yourself. THey offer scholarships.

It's important to address misinformation and ensure a factual understanding of the issue. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that public funds can legally be used for tuition at private religious schools if they are also allowed for nonreligious private schools. This decision aligns with the use of federal funds like Pell grants and Head Start grants in private religious institutions at other educational levels. This legal precedent challenges the notion that public money should not support private religious education, showing that such funding is permissible and constitutional.

Just because something is technically legal does not make it right. Just look at the horrible actions by Callie.

Taxpayers will reject subsidizing Republican kids' private school.

Taxpayers have been subsidizing DEI cult like schools and vehemently rejecting it, but you don’t seem to have a problem with that. Do you?

[Anonymous]

OMG the AI word vomit is too much. Is that Oettinger trying to change the subject via cut and paste?

Start your own thread about vouchers. They aren't relevant to this topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG the AI word vomit is too much. Is that Oettinger trying to change the subject via cut and paste?

Start your own thread about vouchers. They aren't relevant to this topic.

She and her crew are trying to change the subject. 100%. This is like Russian disinformation threads on Reddit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think people would be surprised to find out how little FCPS spends per non-IEP, non-ESOL, non-FARMs pupil. You aren't going to get much out of a $3000 voucher.

1. Overall Budget and Average Spending:
- Average cost per student in FCPS: $19,795.
- Total students in FCPS: 181,000.

2. Special Education Costs:
- Number of special education students: 28,251.
- Average cost for special education per service: $18,421.
- Total cost for special education: 28,251 students x $18,421 per student = $520,564,171.

3. Total Budget for All Students:
- Total budget: 181,000 students x $19,795 per student = $3,582,795,000.

4. Calculating Remaining Budget for Non-Special Education Students:
- Remaining budget after special education costs: $3,582,795,000 (total budget) - $520,564,171 (special ed cost) = $3,062,230,829.

5. Number of Non-Special Education Students:
- Non-special education students: 181,000 (total students) - 28,251 (special ed students) = 152,749 students.

6. Average Spending Per Non-Special Education Student:
- Average spending for non-special education students: $3,062,230,829 / 152,749 students = $20,049 approximately.

7. Consideration for ESOL and FARMs:
- ESOL and FARMs students receive additional federal and state funding. This calculation does not specifically deduct their costs from the total budget but assumes that the total budget includes these funds.

8. Voucher Value Based on Calculation:
- To match the actual expenditure of FCPS on a typical student (excluding special education, ESOL, and FARMs students), a voucher system would ideally offer a value of approximately $20,049. This amount aligns with the average spending per non-special education student and would offer a realistic alternative to public education, ensuring comparable funding for students opting for private education through vouchers.

This voucher value of $20,049 would ensure that the voucher system accurately reflects the financial commitment required to provide a comprehensive education, similar to what is available in the public school system.

Think about this. A 30 person class generates $600,000 in funding. Let’s subtract the cost of the teacher, a fraction of administration, building and other expenses. What you’re talking is several hundred thousand dollars of wasted dollars per class (not actually used for education). Multiply that by x number of classes and x number of schools. Fcps has essentially a blank check to use on everything but paying teachers and educating the children. And for you naysayers who say they are saving it for investment in the schools, wrong. We just approved a bond referendum for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG the AI word vomit is too much. Is that Oettinger trying to change the subject via cut and paste?

Start your own thread about vouchers. They aren't relevant to this topic.

She and her crew are trying to change the subject. 100%. This is like Russian disinformation threads on Reddit.

Russian disinformation? Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the Wacko of 2024!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG the AI word vomit is too much. Is that Oettinger trying to change the subject via cut and paste?

Start your own thread about vouchers. They aren't relevant to this topic.

She and her crew are trying to change the subject. 100%. This is like Russian disinformation threads on Reddit.

Russian disinformation? Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the Wacko of 2024!

Right. It’s not Russia. It’s RWNJs astroturfing. Home grown disrupters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Callie was willing to send families the documents she received about their child, it would certainly go a long way towards reparations.

She did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie was willing to send families the documents she received about their child, it would certainly go a long way towards reparations.

She did.

Oh, great. So we can email her and find out what she was given about our kid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie was willing to send families the documents she received about their child, it would certainly go a long way towards reparations.

She did.

To how many parents? How - mail or email?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie was willing to send families the documents she received about their child, it would certainly go a long way towards reparations.

She did.

Oh, great. So we can email her and find out what she was given about our kid?

You can try:
https://specialeducationaction.com/contact-special-education-action/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie was willing to send families the documents she received about their child, it would certainly go a long way towards reparations.

She did.

Oh, great. So we can email her and find out what she was given about our kid?

You can try:
https://specialeducationaction.com/contact-special-education-action/

You said she DID. Why would pp "try"? Is she commited to telling parents what information she has on their kid, or not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Public money should not subsidize private schools, specifically and especially religious based institutions. You want that? Pay for it yourself. THey offer scholarships.

It's important to address misinformation and ensure a factual understanding of the issue. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that public funds can legally be used for tuition at private religious schools if they are also allowed for nonreligious private schools. This decision aligns with the use of federal funds like Pell grants and Head Start grants in private religious institutions at other educational levels. This legal precedent challenges the notion that public money should not support private religious education, showing that such funding is permissible and constitutional.

Just because something is technically legal does not make it right. Just look at the horrible actions by Callie.

Taxpayers will reject subsidizing Republican kids' private school.

Several prominent Democrats and liberals, in addition to Barack Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, and Rahm Emanuel, have chosen private education for their children. This includes individuals like John Kerry, whose daughters attended private schools, and Nancy Pelosi, whose children also received private education. Michael Bloomberg, a significant figure in the Democratic Party, sent his daughters to a private institution. These examples underscore that the decision to opt for private schooling crosses political boundaries and reflects personal preferences rather than political ideologies. For more detailed information, you can refer to Public School Review.

[Anonymous]

Democrat county. Democrat school board.
And yet people on here blame republicans!???
Please.