Cancel Netflix - Cuties

[Anonymous]

Ted Cruz = QANON = TRUMP

Who listens to Ted Cruz. How about getting rid of the Duggars on TV or the Bates or the Busby's or Dance moms, etc... Got to love the Trumpers hypocrites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It takes an analytical mind to understand this film. Need I say more?

Yes indeed. I watched it + agree. It shows what Mick Jagged dang in a song.. "Women are the N's of the world." On

Ted Cruz is a total hypocrite. He failed to watch the movie but wants it cancelled. Hey he said nothing when Trump said his wife looked like a dog. That is one point of the movie-- women are treated like dogs and sexist objects.

Oops-- meant to write John Lennon sang "Women are the N's of the world". Study the lyrics

[Anonymous]

It clearly demonstrates how we feed our girls a steady diet of this garbage and then we judge them when they adopt it for themselves. Women can’t win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It clearly demonstrates how we feed our girls a steady diet of this garbage and then we judge them when they adopt it for themselves. Women can’t win.

+1

[Anonymous]

It's completely disgusting, sick, and satanic.

[Anonymous]

I watched it and was expecting much worse than what I saw after reading these articles. There were a few dancing sequences that they could’ve left the close-up shots out of but I thought the story was mostly centered around the story with her mother and family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I watched it and was expecting much worse than what I saw after reading these articles. There were a few dancing sequences that they could’ve left the close-up shots out of but I thought the story was mostly centered around the story with her mother and family.

So other than the soft core child porn it was alright? Good to know.

[Anonymous]

This is no different than Todder with Tiaras, oh wait....heritage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is no different than Todder with Tiaras, oh wait....heritage.

It's actually very different, but for some reason that TLC show seems to be your go-to defense. Weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched it and was expecting much worse than what I saw after reading these articles. There were a few dancing sequences that they could’ve left the close-up shots out of but I thought the story was mostly centered around the story with her mother and family.

So other than the soft core child porn it was alright? Good to know.

I guess I just didn’t see it unless Netflix edited the film from earlier. I’ve had to sit through a lot of dance competitions and it wasn’t much worse than anything I’ve seen there. The photo she took that I read about was implied , you didn’t actually see a photo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched it and was expecting much worse than what I saw after reading these articles. There were a few dancing sequences that they could’ve left the close-up shots out of but I thought the story was mostly centered around the story with her mother and family.

So other than the soft core child porn it was alright? Good to know.

I guess I just didn’t see it unless Netflix edited the film from earlier. I’ve had to sit through a lot of dance competitions and it wasn’t much worse than anything I’ve seen there. The photo she took that I read about was implied , you didn’t actually see a photo.

You might have a very warped idea of things. I've seen clips and the stuff was sick beyond words. I dont want to see close ups of 10 year old crotches though- YMMV

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is no different than Todder with Tiaras, oh wait....heritage.

It's actually very different, but for some reason that TLC show seems to be your go-to defense. Weird.

Yes, it's very different. That TLC show (and others) is a real life portrayal of the objectification and borderline sexualization of pre-teen girls while Cuties is a depiction of the how society objectifies girls by sexualizing them.

[Anonymous]

DH had me watch this video of some YouTube star discussing and breaking down the movie:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=exCNHEGnZ5M

After watching the above (which is hilarious by the way), I was pretty convinced that the movie itself really crossed a line. I am super shocked to see people defending it here??!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched it and was expecting much worse than what I saw after reading these articles. There were a few dancing sequences that they could’ve left the close-up shots out of but I thought the story was mostly centered around the story with her mother and family.

So other than the soft core child porn it was alright? Good to know.

I guess I just didn’t see it unless Netflix edited the film from earlier. I’ve had to sit through a lot of dance competitions and it wasn’t much worse than anything I’ve seen there. The photo she took that I read about was implied , you didn’t actually see a photo.

You might have a very warped idea of things. I've seen clips and the stuff was sick beyond words. I dont want to see close ups of 10 year old crotches though- YMMV

Is this the movie we are talking about?
I'm very confused about the controversy other than the shitty promo photo from Netflix. It seems like a commentary on shit we feed girls and the result that they are going to want likes and what not online starting at 11, set against an immgrant/culture clash story?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEVQ6HwBflg

Is it just drastically different from the trailer? I don't see satanic in there- I see someone holding up a mirror to social media/ sexualization culture, for sure. I don't understand the satanic part? Is this all just that weird Qanon online group stirring up shit- because they believe something like democrats eat and sexually abuse kids in pizza places and such?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched it and was expecting much worse than what I saw after reading these articles. There were a few dancing sequences that they could’ve left the close-up shots out of but I thought the story was mostly centered around the story with her mother and family.

So other than the soft core child porn it was alright? Good to know.

I guess I just didn’t see it unless Netflix edited the film from earlier. I’ve had to sit through a lot of dance competitions and it wasn’t much worse than anything I’ve seen there. The photo she took that I read about was implied , you didn’t actually see a photo.

You might have a very warped idea of things. I've seen clips and the stuff was sick beyond words. I dont want to see close ups of 10 year old crotches though- YMMV

Is this the movie we are talking about?
I'm very confused about the controversy other than the shitty promo photo from Netflix. It seems like a commentary on shit we feed girls and the result that they are going to want likes and what not online starting at 11, set against an immgrant/culture clash story?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEVQ6HwBflg

Is it just drastically different from the trailer? I don't see satanic in there- I see someone holding up a mirror to social media/ sexualization culture, for sure. I don't understand the satanic part? Is this all just that weird Qanon online group stirring up shit- because they believe something like democrats eat and sexually abuse kids in pizza places and such?

You know, I'm really not sure how to explain to you that close up shots of children's bottoms while they twerk is essentially soft core porn. That seems like something that should be intuitive, and, if it's not, it's either because the person has some kind of insurmountable cognitive deficit or they just don't want to see it. Neither is solvable- not by me at least- maybe God!

I wish you the best! And I hope don't have children!