Obama's Declared War with Fox News Channel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 6 yeard old report to make a meaningless point - you must have a lot of time on your hands.

And you must get your information from Fox News.

You are the one who dug into the bowels of the internet to find the report and reference it or do you just sit in your basement all day and catalog every negative thing ever said about or by Fox News.

Great response - but then again that is your default when you have nothing intelligent to add.

Back to the basement you go for more "research".

New poster here. Are you not aware that negative information about Fox News exists practically everywhere on the Internet? Do you have the parental controls on your browser set to Murdoch-safe content? Maybe you are still logged into Compuserve and think it's the internet? Seriously, it's like shooting fish in a barrel.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You are the one who dug into the bowels of the internet to find the report and reference it or do you just sit in your basement all day and catalog every negative thing ever said about or by Fox News.

Great response - but then again that is your default when you have nothing intelligent to add.

Back to the basement you go for more "research".

At least I do research (or at least the facsimile of research that involves typing "Fox News Viewers" into Google") rather than simply casting uninformed and inaccurate assertions. Do you want to dispute the accuracy of anything that I've written, or just criticize me for researching what I write? If the latter, I suggest that you not start a fight about whose posts are more intelligent.

I wasn't starting a fight but you seem to want to fight. My only point was that it was a 6 year old report. You typically criticize people on here for not being current or bringing up things that happened years ago. Are you the only one allowed to question people?

I guess my doing the math (2009-2003) make me less intelligent than you.

[Anonymous]

14:04 here.

Here is a new source, bowel free, that says the same thing.

http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions


The time stamp shows how long it took me to find it and comment.

Fox News viewers score so low in knowledge in 2007, the only group that fared worse is viewers of the morning shows like Good Morning America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:14:04 here.

Here is a new source, bowel free, that says the same thing.

http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions


The time stamp shows how long it took me to find it and comment.

Fox News viewers score so low in knowledge in 2007, the only group that fared worse is viewers of the morning shows like Good Morning America.

pretty dumb way to make your point when O'Reilly is way higher than CNN and MSNBC and newspapers. Limbaugh is too. I guess the southern hausfraus who watch Fox in the daytime kill the average, who knows ...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:14:04 here.

Here is a new source, bowel free, that says the same thing.

http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions


The time stamp shows how long it took me to find it and comment.

Fox News viewers score so low in knowledge in 2007, the only group that fared worse is viewers of the morning shows like Good Morning America.

pretty dumb way to make your point when O'Reilly is way higher than CNN and MSNBC and newspapers. Limbaugh is too. I guess the southern hausfraus who watch Fox in the daytime kill the average, who knows ...

How ridiculous are you?

1. This whole thread is about Fox News being shut out by WH, not O'Reilly.
2. The screams by Fox defenders that Obama is shutting out the largest news program on cable are talking about Fox News, not O'Reilly.
3. There is nothing about the Fox News 24 hour format that should cause it to be lower than CNN or MSNBC except its content.
4. "Southern Hausfraus" is, in the world of bigotry, a double word score. You half way to a white sheet and a pointy hat, buster.
5. Colbert beats O'Reilly, and it's not even a news show. But it laughs at Fox News a lot.