Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Never voted for an R in my life but happy not to have to run across you at back to school night. |
| It is a lot of money to spend to have your children be around students that have such offensive views. Children are very impressionable and they are swayed by their peers. If you have a group of very persuasive students expressing their views which go against everything you stand for, it is disheartening. Kids spend most of their time at school. |
| Generally who sets the tone for admission? Is it the school board or the head of school? |
So one side doesn’t care about public schools or public service? How interesting. |
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What a sad and nasty question to even ask! Must every single thing in life be politicized? It is this kind of thinking that has resulted in where the country now is. Sad![/quote]
Yes it is. We moved our dc from a liberal left leaning school because we could t take it anymore. Just teach my dc math and science and keep your political crap to yourselves. [/quote] Gonzaga sounds like the perfect place for you. |
Disagree strongly with the characterization of "chip on the shoulder" and inability to debate. I have kids at 2 of the schools mentioned above and intellectual debate is encouraged and kids and teachers intelligently express a variety of opinions. |
I disagree about STA having a small group of conservatives. We are in the lower school and about 80% of the new students admitted to our grade are all very conservative. |
Interesting. Did you attend Beauvoir? Did it feel conservative? Thanks. |
New poster. Beauvoir leans more liberal. |
I’m a little confused. PP who talked about 80% of admits being conservative, what form? Because if it’s true that Beauvoir leans liberal, and it’s also true—typically—that about 2/3 of the Beauvoir boys go to STA, it would still seem to be the case that STA would have only a small-ish group of conservatives. That’s thinking about c form (4th grade). So where is this happening? And is it having a positive effect—robust debate? Or a negative one, with discourse being reduced to what we see from the White House? I’d appreciate your thoughts. |
If schools declare in their mission statement that they have certain values that are listed on their websites and in the handbooks and the school says it stands for diversity and inclusion and acceptance and it has kids that are anti-gay, calling girls neofeminists or whatnot, then the school is not upholding their own values and that is a problem. |
| Inclusion means including a variety of views and you cannot cherry pick the things you don’t like without cherry picking the liberal things that are also not likable. |
No I am sorry it does mean that racist or bigoted views are tolerated. |
Not tolerating bigotry is not cherry picking. You are incorrect. |
I don't think so. Some schools expel kids for racist, anti-gay, or sexist comments. Those are not the "variety of views" they are looking for. |