Universal Healthcare UK - Baby can't have treatment in US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh now it's okay. I see.

This thread is about a TERMINALLY ILL baby in the UK whose parents in the UK and being denied, by several judges, the ability to perform medical experimentation on their baby, treatment which is not intended to cure the baby's illness nor is it expected to relieve the baby's suffering.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with eugenics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whoever provided the selective quotes can stop doing that, please.

Did she support eugenics at a time when a whole lot of people supported eugenics? Yes. Did she have racist attitudes at a time when lots of people had racist attitudes? Yes. Was eliminating black babies her purpose for supporting birth control? No.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/filer_public/37/fd/37fdc7b6-de5f-4d22-8c05-9568268e92d8/sanger_opposition_claims_fact_sheet_2016.pdf

This.

Sanger was also very much pro birth control as a form of personal responsibility which is Republican's favorite thing after guns and god

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The party that rabidly promotes the killing of babies, especially poor babies of color a la Margaret "eugenics" Sanger, wants a baby to die and not even allow the parents to use the money they raised to try and save him.

Don't ever say republicans don't care about babies once they are born. True colors shining through, ghouls.

Scoring political points might be enjoyable for you. But for this particular baby, stick to facts. He cannot be saved, only prolonged.

+1

And what about every other baby fighting for its life? This one will get some special attention, Republicans will all pat themselves on the backs and think they are good and moral people while all of those other babies don't get the care they need and die. And so too will this one UK baby.

Don't break your arms off patting yourselves on your backs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The party that rabidly promotes the killing of babies, especially poor babies of color a la Margaret "eugenics" Sanger, wants a baby to die and not even allow the parents to use the money they raised to try and save him.

Don't ever say republicans don't care about babies once they are born. True colors shining through, ghouls.

Again, why all the attention on the baby that can't be saved and has a horrible quality of life, when there are others that can be saved if given access to care? Still waiting . . .

And waiting . . .

[Anonymous]

Ask yourselves why this child wasn't offered this experimental treatment in the U.K. well before he deteriorated this badly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where's all the Libs that scream they Rs don't care about children after they are born?

Oh, right here telling this kids parents to let him die.

Rs don't care about paying for babies once they're born. Listen to the arguments being made here on this thread. "They came up with the money if they have the money to pay for this." as long as it's privately paid for, Rs have no problem with children being kept on life support as long as the money holds out.

But funding decent food, dental care, housing, utilities, and education for kids of little means an no crowdfunding is not a priority for most Republicans.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh now it's okay. I see.

This thread is about a TERMINALLY ILL baby in the UK whose parents in the UK and being denied, by several judges, the ability to perform medical experimentation on their baby, treatment which is not intended to cure the baby's illness nor is it expected to relieve the baby's suffering.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with eugenics.

It has everything to do with human rights. That inevitably deteriorate under the socialist government. It's a fact that's been proven many times, and I wish dumb people would learn from history already.

I don't give a flying f*ck about any circumstances surrounding this situation. How parents are denied the rights to move their child to another hospital or have him die at home is beyond me. I fear this brave new world you're fighting to build.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh now it's okay. I see.

This thread is about a TERMINALLY ILL baby in the UK whose parents in the UK and being denied, by several judges, the ability to perform medical experimentation on their baby, treatment which is not intended to cure the baby's illness nor is it expected to relieve the baby's suffering.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with eugenics.

It has everything to do with human rights. That inevitably deteriorate under the socialist government. It's a fact that's been proven many times, and I wish dumb people would learn from history already.

I don't give a flying f*ck about any circumstances surrounding this situation. How parents are denied the rights to move their child to another hospital or have him die at home is beyond me. I fear this brave new world you're fighting to build.

They are allowed to have him die at home. Generally, with the NHS, you don't get your choice of hospital, though.