I wish there was a way to ban that deranged woman from this board. She's poisonous. |
Jargon indeed. Whatever else this is, it is embarrassing. And inadequate under the circumstances that the children have described. When there is a crisis, especially when children are involved, what is needed is absolutely crystal clear language from the leadership. This hardly measures up at all: On Oct 15, 2014 6:59 PM, "Cameron Louis" <cameron.louis@basisdc.org> wrote: Good evening everyone, I just wanted to take a quick moment to follow up regarding an incident that took place in Ms. Pickett’s Chemistry classroom and our response. Our Dean of Students may have incorrectly messaged to the whole element that their grades might be adversely affected by one student’s decision to steal lab materials. We’ve taken a number of steps to make sure that this messaging was retracted and that the students feel comfortable with what transpired. I don’t want to make this a bigger issue than it was, but I did want to share with you all that no student’s grades will be negatively affected. Thank you and know that we’re constantly reflecting on how to make BASIS the best, student-centered environment possible and on how to be better for all of your students. Thank you all and I hope that you’re having a wonderful week! The other thing you quickly learn when tweens are involved and there has been a serious incident, and I view the Dean of Students threatening to fail an entire Chemistry class, clearly not in a cool, calm and collected manner, as a serious incident, especially if it indeed was in response to their diligent efforts to find the candy in question, is that the children will need to be reassured again on Monday, after they have processed the event, by someone who has authority over the Dean, who will come into their class to answer any questions and their parents may need to be reassured again as well, but usually, when the children calm down, the parents follow soon after, because it is of course the fact that the children are upset, not really why they are upset, or the legitimacy of it, the rationality of it, that is upsetting the parents I cannot quite imagine how bad this was, but for someone with apparent authority to threaten the academic standing of a group of 13 year olds, just in and of itself, shocks me. They could go a long way toward rehabilitating the reputation of Basis by terminating that Dean's employment as a real consequence for his behavior, and a lesson to all in the community that no one has the right to make that kind of threat this way. That it is absolutely inexcusable and will not be tolerated. |
So are you really going to go on the word of an anonymous DCUM poster who may or may not be an actual teacher and make a judgement based on that alone? I know that it is a fact that DC charters get substantially less funding than DCPS schools. I want to help support our teachers and our school. I also know that no other school in DC will provide the great education that my kid is getting now at BASIS. Well, the brightest thing would be to really push the Boosters on whether it EVER goes to "teacher's salaries," defined as what is in their contracts they sign at the beginning of the year, and see whether the answer indicates that you should give your hard earned money to the BOOSTERS for the ATF or to individual teachers in the form of gift cards because the answer to the question does not satisfy you............ |
IMO, the best solution would be to force him to say sorry to the section in front of the HOS |
Yes 8th graders are exactly as you describe. That is why he should have popped his head in bright and early Monday morning, made the Dean apologise as a demonstration of his power as HOS, and then explained that at Basis, this is not the way we do things............ Simple enough, and would have calmed emotional irrational kids right down. Why didn't he do this? I have no clue, and am deeply disappointed.... and embarrassed for Basis, where I have two children, and thought things had settled down quite nicely after the chaos of our first year........ |
|
For people who are so hesitant to want to deal with kids who steal, who are so focused on kids feelings, you sure don't seem to give a damn about everyone else's feelings, you want everyone else publicly shamed, publicly humiliated, publicly punished, and dirty laundry aired over the most trivial of things...
Pretty hypocritical and fraudulent in my humble opinion. Also, I had a kid read the email from the HOS, who understood it just fine to mean grades wouldn't be hurt. So much for "mumbo jumbo" and "messaging" and "jargon" you keep carrying on about - I think you are insulting our intelligence with that nonsense at this point. And finally, you'd do well to not keep constantly badmouthing "boosters" - a.) if you presume to be wanting to "help" the school with your criticisms, then that too would makes you a "booster" because there's no formal membership or dues, it's just involved parents b.) if you care at all about your child's teachers, then it doesn't make sense to be demonizing and alienating the people who've been fundraising for ATF and helping with activities and other things. Just because someone pushes back against you or refutes you doesn't mean there's some organized conspiracy of "Boosters" sitting in a DCUM war room with a set of canned talking point. Here it's all just random posters, random parents, and even some posters who aren't even involved in the school, from what I've seen. From the many years I've been on DCUM, I've seen people constantly weighing in on threads about schools that they aren't even involved in, whether on the pro or con side. |
|
|
|
I'll agree that there is plenty of blame to go around but from where I'm standing, that's a two way street. I've definitely seen numerous posts over the last week which were venting outrage which was based on mistaken information and mistaken assumptions about policies, about course sequences, about staff, about who people thought they were dealing with on this forum, and so on... not to mention distorting and misrepresenting things, not to mention being not acknowledging the correct information, and, worse yet, being deliberately and willfully obtuse and belligerent and accusatory when other posters were trying to explain the correct information.
And all that does is confuse and mislead others, along with sowing a whole lot of resentment. The single biggest thing right now besmirching the reputation of BASIS is this insistence on blasting out one lengthy, scathing, drawn out grievance after another, on public forums of all places, rather than actually even bothering to discuss them with the staff or in a more appropriate venue, along with making a ton of demands and threats. All of this has been uncalled for, and it really needs to end. |
Can you believe that the author is a former English teacher? Although I do not know that he ever taught at Basis, even their English teachers would not accept this kind of drivel from 8th graders. He is an illustration of why our children are not learning the nuts and bolts of English at Basis - he never got called on the nuts and bolts. And he must not have taught long there, because the only English Basis teachers are required to teach is grammar and vocabulary. At the beginning of his incomprehensible email, I did have myself a laugh. I would be hard pressed to believe that an unsophisticated corporation ever engaged in this nonsense. We would not have let them in a situation like this where they were supposedly trying to clarify and reassure. He may have created the verb "messaging," or he may have heard it at some leadership seminar (presumably not catering to 13 year olds), but the poor guy has got to let "messaging" go now, since most parents are not familiar with that language (I am, but not the kind of amateurish employment of it that his email demonstrates), and it is not surprising to me, having dealt with foreign, albeit sophisticated clients, that some parents who do not really speak English did not get the message. It is also not surprising to me that literate well heeled parents whose children had been "adversely affected" by the "incident" were infuriated by such nonsense. He could have consulted the psychologist they now have on staff (still no school nurse), or requested assistance from real lawyers (which is what to me it sounds like he was trying to be). He presumably has assistance from genuine lawyers because of the IDEA and ADA violations, and there is a fantastic Introduction to Law teacher who would have given him an F for this email were he purporting to be a corporation. We are much more precise and concise even when trying to avoid all responsibility. And we use English. And any judge would have called us out on the "lab materials" as well, since it is not clear at all from his message that they were something as insignificant, replaceable, and tempting as candy. It is deeply ironic that one of the "leadership failures" here was an inability to communicate in writing. F in English and D in corporate doublespeak and again, F in legalese. Perhaps he ought to go back to teaching English. He might learn something from the grammar and vocabulary he is required to teach 8th graders. Or they might learn nothing the entire year. That too has happened at Basis. But a very poor show and a pitiful attempt at damage control. Not surprised it exploded in its face. He need an editor. |
|
Lawyers? Psychologists? You act as though a school shooting had happened. You act as though the kids were scarred for life. Ridiculous.
All that happened is that a perhaps overzealous Dean (who, by the way, came from the DCPS system and who's used to how things are done there) tried to get some accountability for the theft, and his statement was IMMEDIATELY WITHDRAWN BY THE HEAD OF SCHOOL. That's all that happened. End of story. You keep demonstrating that you are truly out of control and totally lacking any reasonable perspective here, to be blowing things completely out of proportion beyond all reason. Frankly, with the way you've been approaching all of this, I don't think you'd find it possible to survive with ANY school in DC. |
|
This is really getting old. The Head of School told everyone their grades were safe back on the 15th, as did the Chemistry teacher. And, that has been consistently repeated many times over at every level by the school since then, and NOBODY from the school has said or suggested anything to the contrary.
If there's any "confusion" and "controversy" is NOT coming from the school, nor from "boosters" or anyone else, the only place it's coming from is the people who keep disregarding what the school has repeatedly stated, who keep repeating wrong information and rumors in some unreasonable attempt to keep stirring up controversy when the matter was clearly already resolved all the way back on the 15th. Done. Over with. Time to move on. |
You've got to go back on your meds, you've lost connection with reality. |
|
End this forum PLEASE!
There is no such thing as bad publicity, but enough is enough. |
There is actually such a thing as bad publicity, and you are now familiar with it. And I think for many, revenge is sweet. It is beyond me why anyone would begin a thread like this in this forum, given that most on DCUM dislike Basis parents and perhaps the school itself. Basis parents who have been blasting the superiority of their school to the rooftops since before it even opened. But they have been relying on statistics and track records in Arizona, which makes no sense, because we have a completely different population, and that is the population that is actually at the school. Or perhaps not so much, anymore. It does seem they are having a problem "keeping the lights on." And threads like this cannot help. Even if parents "approve" of silent lunches, no one outside the school until this month had ever heard of them. The attitude and outrage of some parents over stolen candy, who ranted and raved about the thief calling him names, while completely ignoring the experienced teachers of 8th graders, who piped up and told them that any teacher worth their salt would not even use salt, flour............. you name it, they eat it. The publication of an email that the Boosters seized on for dear life: Aha! HE was clear. Those who did not understand him are STUPID. We are DONE. I find the lack of sympathy or empathy for anyone who did not understand the email very difficult to stomach. I find the behavior of the Dean something I would have expected at DCPS, not Basis, where the emphasis is supposed to be on personal responsibility. And I do not think that either the Dean or the Head have taken responsibility here, for what they have done, and for what they have not done. And I think that is truly unfortunate. But for all those waiting to take Basis down a notch, I think they got what they wanted. And I think certainly many parents feel that the most vocal Basis parents on this forum are a tiny minority of well educated people with too much time on their hands whose mission in life is to simply find different ways to say: If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen, and you were stupid to come here in the first place. This is also not taking personal responsibility, it is claiming immunity: My kid read that letter, and he understood it just fine, so everyone should, if they are even a bit intelligent/educated Any parent who didn't understand the email is stupid Any kid who did not understand the situation is stupid (whether or not they had parents who got the email, and chose to share it with them) Interestingly, all the lawyer like types who initially said that no one could believe what the kids said happened have moved on to conceding that it did happen, and basically sanctioning the Dean's behavior because, they say, this email made it all better for everyone involved, and again, remember, if you did not understand it or are still living in fear of the Dean, it is your fault. Typical Basis superiority, which is why one parent referred to the school as two different schools: Those of the have and the have nots. The kids are not segregated so much, but the parents are separated by class, race, ethnic origin, and do not seem to have any desire to try to walk a mile in anyone else's shoes. |