Why do you walk your dog off leash?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's not an assault if I pepper spray your off-leash dog. I have no way of predicting your animal - your legal responsibility is to be in control of your animal at all times. If you're not in control of your animal, good luck trying to explain that to any police officer or animal control officer. Both have explicitly told me that I am well within my rights to pepper spray an unleashed or unrestrained dog if it comes up to me.

Good luck explaining your illegal behavior to the cops - I would love, love to see you try.


It's like hitting somebody with a car because they are jaywalking... you will look lovely in handcuffs.


Actually, there are numerous cases of jaywalkers being cited after being hit by cars: http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-on-foot/2010/08/rollerblader-gets-hit-by-van-wakes-up-in-hospital-with-jaywalking-ticket-51.html (the article mentions several of them).

If you're breaking the law, don't expect the police to be on your side. And if you're walking with an unleashed dog, the police will cite you if it approaches someone and they feel threatened enough to use pepper spray. There is no legal consideration given to a dog off-leash in that situation.


Sure if it is an accident... psycho pepper spray lady is abusing dogs that are anywhere within reach.


No, not "if it is an accident."

The police don't cite people who are defending themselves against law-breakers. Period.

Sorry you are not bright enough to understand. I doubt you have the mental capacity to understand nearly anything, given your responses on this thread.


You are conflating a whole bunch of things. Drivers who hit jaywalkers ON PURPOSE are not OK in the eyes of the law. You can't "defend yourself" against every misdemeanor you stumble on.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's not an assault if I pepper spray your off-leash dog. I have no way of predicting your animal - your legal responsibility is to be in control of your animal at all times. If you're not in control of your animal, good luck trying to explain that to any police officer or animal control officer. Both have explicitly told me that I am well within my rights to pepper spray an unleashed or unrestrained dog if it comes up to me.

Good luck explaining your illegal behavior to the cops - I would love, love to see you try.


It's like hitting somebody with a car because they are jaywalking... you will look lovely in handcuffs.


Actually, there are numerous cases of jaywalkers being cited after being hit by cars: http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-on-foot/2010/08/rollerblader-gets-hit-by-van-wakes-up-in-hospital-with-jaywalking-ticket-51.html (the article mentions several of them).

If you're breaking the law, don't expect the police to be on your side. And if you're walking with an unleashed dog, the police will cite you if it approaches someone and they feel threatened enough to use pepper spray. There is no legal consideration given to a dog off-leash in that situation.



+100000

It is not only the "state park employees" that know the cops.



+infinity

I am appalled at the entitlement of thinking that a strange, unleashed dog going up to people, that those people should just suck it up.


No kidding. I thought people were supposed to be somewhat intelligent here? A little common sense goes a looooooooong way!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's not an assault if I pepper spray your off-leash dog. I have no way of predicting your animal - your legal responsibility is to be in control of your animal at all times. If you're not in control of your animal, good luck trying to explain that to any police officer or animal control officer. Both have explicitly told me that I am well within my rights to pepper spray an unleashed or unrestrained dog if it comes up to me.

Good luck explaining your illegal behavior to the cops - I would love, love to see you try.


It's like hitting somebody with a car because they are jaywalking... you will look lovely in handcuffs.


Actually, there are numerous cases of jaywalkers being cited after being hit by cars: http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-on-foot/2010/08/rollerblader-gets-hit-by-van-wakes-up-in-hospital-with-jaywalking-ticket-51.html (the article mentions several of them).

If you're breaking the law, don't expect the police to be on your side. And if you're walking with an unleashed dog, the police will cite you if it approaches someone and they feel threatened enough to use pepper spray. There is no legal consideration given to a dog off-leash in that situation.


Sure if it is an accident... psycho pepper spray lady is abusing dogs that are anywhere within reach.


No, not "if it is an accident."

The police don't cite people who are defending themselves against law-breakers. Period.

Sorry you are not bright enough to understand. I doubt you have the mental capacity to understand nearly anything, given your responses on this thread.


You are conflating a whole bunch of things. Drivers who hit jaywalkers ON PURPOSE are not OK in the eyes of the law. You can't "defend yourself" against every misdemeanor you stumble on.


I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where a driver hits a pedestrian on purpose, for the reason of defending themselves. Maybe because they were swerving away from something?

But a person pepper spraying a dog for the purpose of defending themselves, is actually a recommended course of action from law enforcement and animal control. And it is entirely a recommended course of action for a perceived potential threat - not only *after* being attacked.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's not an assault if I pepper spray your off-leash dog. I have no way of predicting your animal - your legal responsibility is to be in control of your animal at all times. If you're not in control of your animal, good luck trying to explain that to any police officer or animal control officer. Both have explicitly told me that I am well within my rights to pepper spray an unleashed or unrestrained dog if it comes up to me.

Good luck explaining your illegal behavior to the cops - I would love, love to see you try.


It's like hitting somebody with a car because they are jaywalking... you will look lovely in handcuffs.


Actually, there are numerous cases of jaywalkers being cited after being hit by cars: http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-on-foot/2010/08/rollerblader-gets-hit-by-van-wakes-up-in-hospital-with-jaywalking-ticket-51.html (the article mentions several of them).

If you're breaking the law, don't expect the police to be on your side. And if you're walking with an unleashed dog, the police will cite you if it approaches someone and they feel threatened enough to use pepper spray. There is no legal consideration given to a dog off-leash in that situation.


Sure if it is an accident... psycho pepper spray lady is abusing dogs that are anywhere within reach.


No, not "if it is an accident."

The police don't cite people who are defending themselves against law-breakers. Period.

Sorry you are not bright enough to understand. I doubt you have the mental capacity to understand nearly anything, given your responses on this thread.


You are conflating a whole bunch of things. Drivers who hit jaywalkers ON PURPOSE are not OK in the eyes of the law. You can't "defend yourself" against every misdemeanor you stumble on.


I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where a driver hits a pedestrian on purpose, for the reason of defending themselves. Maybe because they were swerving away from something?

But a person pepper spraying a dog for the purpose of defending themselves, is actually a recommended course of action from law enforcement and animal control. And it is entirely a recommended course of action for a perceived potential threat - not only *after* being attacked.


The point - sorry, I guess you were too slow to get it - is that a dog merely being off leash does not give you the right to "defend yourself" against it by pepper spraying or kicking the dog. The dog has to DO something other than just be off leash for you to turn violent. Just the same as you cannot simply hit a jaywalker with your car, just because the person is a jaywalker.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you have a fear of dogs?


I've had dogs lunge and aggressively jump on me, so yes, I view all strange animals as the unpredictable creatures they are. I know not all dogs are aggressive, but it's not up to me to decipher that - it's the dog owner/caretaker's responsibility to be in control of their animal at all times.


Just wondering. I don't think the leash will help though. I find my dog on a leash scares the crap out of people even if we are a football field away.

Some people are just afraid of dogs and a leash really does not help with that.

Have you ever heard the phrase you can only control your own reaction to a situation, you can't control others.
You may want to work on your own fears, you won't change others.


That's where pepper spray comes in hand. If your dog comes up to me, I will pepper spray it. I'm not going to wait for it to jump or lunge. Many owners will be irresponsible and not keep their animal by their side. I can't control bad dog owners, but I can be proactive about it and pepper spray it if it comes close.


+1 spray first, discuss later.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's not an assault if I pepper spray your off-leash dog. I have no way of predicting your animal - your legal responsibility is to be in control of your animal at all times. If you're not in control of your animal, good luck trying to explain that to any police officer or animal control officer. Both have explicitly told me that I am well within my rights to pepper spray an unleashed or unrestrained dog if it comes up to me.

Good luck explaining your illegal behavior to the cops - I would love, love to see you try.


It's like hitting somebody with a car because they are jaywalking... you will look lovely in handcuffs.


Actually, there are numerous cases of jaywalkers being cited after being hit by cars: http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-on-foot/2010/08/rollerblader-gets-hit-by-van-wakes-up-in-hospital-with-jaywalking-ticket-51.html (the article mentions several of them).

If you're breaking the law, don't expect the police to be on your side. And if you're walking with an unleashed dog, the police will cite you if it approaches someone and they feel threatened enough to use pepper spray. There is no legal consideration given to a dog off-leash in that situation.


Sure if it is an accident... psycho pepper spray lady is abusing dogs that are anywhere within reach.


No, not "if it is an accident."

The police don't cite people who are defending themselves against law-breakers. Period.

Sorry you are not bright enough to understand. I doubt you have the mental capacity to understand nearly anything, given your responses on this thread.


You are conflating a whole bunch of things. Drivers who hit jaywalkers ON PURPOSE are not OK in the eyes of the law. You can't "defend yourself" against every misdemeanor you stumble on.


I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where a driver hits a pedestrian on purpose, for the reason of defending themselves. Maybe because they were swerving away from something?

But a person pepper spraying a dog for the purpose of defending themselves, is actually a recommended course of action from law enforcement and animal control. And it is entirely a recommended course of action for a perceived potential threat - not only *after* being attacked.


Yep. I don't know crazy, I-do-what-I-want, ignorant PP's jurisdiction, but in my jurisdiction, you can pepper spray a dog "running at large," i.e., any dog off-leash in a public area not specifically designated for dogs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's not an assault if I pepper spray your off-leash dog. I have no way of predicting your animal - your legal responsibility is to be in control of your animal at all times. If you're not in control of your animal, good luck trying to explain that to any police officer or animal control officer. Both have explicitly told me that I am well within my rights to pepper spray an unleashed or unrestrained dog if it comes up to me.

Good luck explaining your illegal behavior to the cops - I would love, love to see you try.


It's like hitting somebody with a car because they are jaywalking... you will look lovely in handcuffs.


Actually, there are numerous cases of jaywalkers being cited after being hit by cars: http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-on-foot/2010/08/rollerblader-gets-hit-by-van-wakes-up-in-hospital-with-jaywalking-ticket-51.html (the article mentions several of them).

If you're breaking the law, don't expect the police to be on your side. And if you're walking with an unleashed dog, the police will cite you if it approaches someone and they feel threatened enough to use pepper spray. There is no legal consideration given to a dog off-leash in that situation.


Sure if it is an accident... psycho pepper spray lady is abusing dogs that are anywhere within reach.


No, not "if it is an accident."

The police don't cite people who are defending themselves against law-breakers. Period.

Sorry you are not bright enough to understand. I doubt you have the mental capacity to understand nearly anything, given your responses on this thread.


You are conflating a whole bunch of things. Drivers who hit jaywalkers ON PURPOSE are not OK in the eyes of the law. You can't "defend yourself" against every misdemeanor you stumble on.


I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where a driver hits a pedestrian on purpose, for the reason of defending themselves. Maybe because they were swerving away from something?

But a person pepper spraying a dog for the purpose of defending themselves, is actually a recommended course of action from law enforcement and animal control. And it is entirely a recommended course of action for a perceived potential threat - not only *after* being attacked.


The point - sorry, I guess you were too slow to get it - is that a dog merely being off leash does not give you the right to "defend yourself" against it by pepper spraying or kicking the dog. The dog has to DO something other than just be off leash for you to turn violent. Just the same as you cannot simply hit a jaywalker with your car, just because the person is a jaywalker.


Right - I'm not running around pepper spraying dogs. But if it comes up to me (as opposed to me going up to them), that is a perceived safety concern. Dogs are animals. They bite. They lunge. I am not responsible for them - their owner is. I am not responsible for predicting their behavior. I am not responsible for giving animals the benefit of the doubt. I am only responsible for predicting myself.
Anonymous
A reminder to DC residents. DC has a leash law. Your dog must be leashed. Further more, the leash length limit is four feet. So, these long leash "reels" are unlawful.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's not an assault if I pepper spray your off-leash dog. I have no way of predicting your animal - your legal responsibility is to be in control of your animal at all times. If you're not in control of your animal, good luck trying to explain that to any police officer or animal control officer. Both have explicitly told me that I am well within my rights to pepper spray an unleashed or unrestrained dog if it comes up to me.

Good luck explaining your illegal behavior to the cops - I would love, love to see you try.


It's like hitting somebody with a car because they are jaywalking... you will look lovely in handcuffs.


Actually, there are numerous cases of jaywalkers being cited after being hit by cars: http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-on-foot/2010/08/rollerblader-gets-hit-by-van-wakes-up-in-hospital-with-jaywalking-ticket-51.html (the article mentions several of them).

If you're breaking the law, don't expect the police to be on your side. And if you're walking with an unleashed dog, the police will cite you if it approaches someone and they feel threatened enough to use pepper spray. There is no legal consideration given to a dog off-leash in that situation.


Sure if it is an accident... psycho pepper spray lady is abusing dogs that are anywhere within reach.


No, not "if it is an accident."

The police don't cite people who are defending themselves against law-breakers. Period.

Sorry you are not bright enough to understand. I doubt you have the mental capacity to understand nearly anything, given your responses on this thread.


You are conflating a whole bunch of things. Drivers who hit jaywalkers ON PURPOSE are not OK in the eyes of the law. You can't "defend yourself" against every misdemeanor you stumble on.


I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where a driver hits a pedestrian on purpose, for the reason of defending themselves. Maybe because they were swerving away from something?

But a person pepper spraying a dog for the purpose of defending themselves, is actually a recommended course of action from law enforcement and animal control. And it is entirely a recommended course of action for a perceived potential threat - not only *after* being attacked.


The point - sorry, I guess you were too slow to get it - is that a dog merely being off leash does not give you the right to "defend yourself" against it by pepper spraying or kicking the dog. The dog has to DO something other than just be off leash for you to turn violent. Just the same as you cannot simply hit a jaywalker with your car, just because the person is a jaywalker.


Please quote the code that says this. Because my locality's code says only that you can't do anything to a properly restrained dog under its owner's immediate control. Any dog either not restrained or not under immediate control is not protected.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The point - sorry, I guess you were too slow to get it - is that a dog merely being off leash does not give you the right to "defend yourself" against it by pepper spraying or kicking the dog. The dog has to DO something other than just be off leash for you to turn violent. Just the same as you cannot simply hit a jaywalker with your car, just because the person is a jaywalker.


Right - I'm not running around pepper spraying dogs. But if it comes up to me (as opposed to me going up to them), that is a perceived safety concern. Dogs are animals. They bite. They lunge. I am not responsible for them - their owner is. I am not responsible for predicting their behavior. I am not responsible for giving animals the benefit of the doubt. I am only responsible for predicting myself.


+1

What, do you think PP is going to run after an unleashed dog and spray it?

If an illegally unleashed dog approaches you, that is legal reason enough to defend yourself. It is not the job of the human being who is legally in the right to be in the public space to judge whether an unleashed dog that approaches them may be a threat or not. They have every right to defend themselves without having to be attacked first.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The point - sorry, I guess you were too slow to get it - is that a dog merely being off leash does not give you the right to "defend yourself" against it by pepper spraying or kicking the dog. The dog has to DO something other than just be off leash for you to turn violent. Just the same as you cannot simply hit a jaywalker with your car, just because the person is a jaywalker.


Right - I'm not running around pepper spraying dogs. But if it comes up to me (as opposed to me going up to them), that is a perceived safety concern. Dogs are animals. They bite. They lunge. I am not responsible for them - their owner is. I am not responsible for predicting their behavior. I am not responsible for giving animals the benefit of the doubt. I am only responsible for predicting myself.


+1

What, do you think PP is going to run after an unleashed dog and spray it?

If an illegally unleashed dog approaches you, that is legal reason enough to defend yourself. It is not the job of the human being who is legally in the right to be in the public space to judge whether an unleashed dog that approaches them may be a threat or not. They have every right to defend themselves without having to be attacked first.


Yes, that's what all the morons on this thread have been threatening to do. They've all said that any dog who approaches them - not bites, not even growls, but just approaches them - is going to get kicked and pepper sprayed. One total psycho said she harbored fantasies about dogs coming near her so that she COULD kick and pepper spray them. So yes, that's who I am talking to. The insane lunatics who are looking for a reason to get violent. In the name of safety and law and order.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The point - sorry, I guess you were too slow to get it - is that a dog merely being off leash does not give you the right to "defend yourself" against it by pepper spraying or kicking the dog. The dog has to DO something other than just be off leash for you to turn violent. Just the same as you cannot simply hit a jaywalker with your car, just because the person is a jaywalker.


Right - I'm not running around pepper spraying dogs. But if it comes up to me (as opposed to me going up to them), that is a perceived safety concern. Dogs are animals. They bite. They lunge. I am not responsible for them - their owner is. I am not responsible for predicting their behavior. I am not responsible for giving animals the benefit of the doubt. I am only responsible for predicting myself.


+1

What, do you think PP is going to run after an unleashed dog and spray it?

If an illegally unleashed dog approaches you, that is legal reason enough to defend yourself. It is not the job of the human being who is legally in the right to be in the public space to judge whether an unleashed dog that approaches them may be a threat or not. They have every right to defend themselves without having to be attacked first.


Yes, that's what all the morons on this thread have been threatening to do. They've all said that any dog who approaches them - not bites, not even growls, but just approaches them - is going to get kicked and pepper sprayed. One total psycho said she harbored fantasies about dogs coming near her so that she COULD kick and pepper spray them. So yes, that's who I am talking to. The insane lunatics who are looking for a reason to get violent. In the name of safety and law and order.


Why is a strange, unrestrained dog coming up to someone, somehow less dangerous than another strange, unrestrained animal coming up to someone? Be it a dog or a raccoon, I won't go running around chasing them and pepper spraying them. But if I'm out for a jog and a dog, raccoon, or other strange animal comes up up to me, I will pepper spray it. Because I deserve to jog in peace without concern of being chased by animals, or wait until they jump/bite. I know the law, and I know I have the law on my side.

Anonymous
Is it true that dogs are allowed to run unleashed in state parks? We walk at a state park near our house frequently and all the dogs we see are leashed. (In VA).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is it true that dogs are allowed to run unleashed in state parks? We walk at a state park near our house frequently and all the dogs we see are leashed. (In VA).


Nope. The park employee is an idiot.

Pets in Virginia State Parks:

Pets are allowed in all Virginia State Parks. State regulations prohibit pets on public swim beaches and in public facilities (bathhouses, visitor centers, park offices, restaurants, etc.), and pets must be confined or kept on a leash no longer than six feet and kept under supervision while in the park. While pets are allowed at False Cape State Park, they generally are not permitted access through Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge, so be sure to call False Cape SP, (757) 426-7128, to verify access.

To avoid potential inconvenience, we ask that you bring proof of current rabies vaccination. This is strongly recommended in Virginia Beach where a rabies alert is in effect.

There is an additional nightly charge per pet for cabins (PDF) stays.

Unfortunately, some pets and their owners don't always consider other guests. Pet owners must clean up after their pets. If a pet is left unattended, becomes a nuisance in violation of the leash law, disturbs others by barking during quiet hours or damages a park facility, the owner's stay may be terminated without refund. The owner will be billed for any damage to park facilities caused by pets.

http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/state-parks/pets.shtml
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's not an assault if I pepper spray your off-leash dog. I have no way of predicting your animal - your legal responsibility is to be in control of your animal at all times. If you're not in control of your animal, good luck trying to explain that to any police officer or animal control officer. Both have explicitly told me that I am well within my rights to pepper spray an unleashed or unrestrained dog if it comes up to me.

Good luck explaining your illegal behavior to the cops - I would love, love to see you try.


It's like hitting somebody with a car because they are jaywalking... you will look lovely in handcuffs.


Actually, there are numerous cases of jaywalkers being cited after being hit by cars: http://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-on-foot/2010/08/rollerblader-gets-hit-by-van-wakes-up-in-hospital-with-jaywalking-ticket-51.html (the article mentions several of them).

If you're breaking the law, don't expect the police to be on your side. And if you're walking with an unleashed dog, the police will cite you if it approaches someone and they feel threatened enough to use pepper spray. There is no legal consideration given to a dog off-leash in that situation.


Sure if it is an accident... psycho pepper spray lady is abusing dogs that are anywhere within reach.


No, not "if it is an accident."

The police don't cite people who are defending themselves against law-breakers. Period.

Sorry you are not bright enough to understand. I doubt you have the mental capacity to understand nearly anything, given your responses on this thread.


You are conflating a whole bunch of things. Drivers who hit jaywalkers ON PURPOSE are not OK in the eyes of the law. You can't "defend yourself" against every misdemeanor you stumble on.


I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where a driver hits a pedestrian on purpose, for the reason of defending themselves. Maybe because they were swerving away from something?

But a person pepper spraying a dog for the purpose of defending themselves, is actually a recommended course of action from law enforcement and animal control. And it is entirely a recommended course of action for a perceived potential threat - not only *after* being attacked.


You don't remember the lady that ran her H over in the parking lot after he told her she was useless and ugly.
post reply Forum Index » Pets
Message Quick Reply
Go to: