8/26, 18:36. I know, more nitpicking. It's just hard to take people seriously when they constantly have their facts wrong. |
Don't you have a commission meeting to attend?
|
So, I guess Langley IS the only high school worth talking about in Fairfax County...
|
| It just the best unless you can get into TJ |
Clearly that poster meant after T.J. Before and after said T.J. Nitpick nitpick nitpick. |
Please go read the threads started today by concerned FCPS parents with young kids in classes of 30, 33, and 35. I simply can't understand why you have to argue about a rough head count when someone is trying to say something nice and encouraging about FCPS. The County is exploding with new housing starts and build-up in Tysons. The School Board is wrestling with an enormous population increase, overcrowding, no increase in tax dollars, a new Supervisor and a broken College system saying "we want to see rigor! AP courses! Honors!". That all takes money. |
|
Yes! All you parents who for some reason want to fight over the size of Langley's student body, why don't you tell these parents not to worry; Langley will still be a tiny little school of under 2000 when their kids get there:
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/327989.page |
|
Meh. I've lived here for a long time now. Aside from TJ, the one school I consistently hear about is Woodson. Langley is mostly a standout b/c of the "upper class" demo that feeds into it.
I'm not putting it down. It's a good school. Very good. But, I've never heard a single person refer to it as the best HS in Fairfax County. BTW, my child is currently zoned for neither of these schools. |
| thank you. Finally, some input for OP that may be of use. |
Um, OK. Any more non-sequiturs you'd like to share? |
The class sizes will stay large in the Langley pyramid. If the enrollment shrinks, FCPS will just move students there from other schools or cut the number of teachers assigned to the school. |
| why do you think enrollment will shrink? The new Supervisor is preparing for an enormous increase in population due to the explosion of Tysons, the dulles Hi Tech corridor, and the jobs that GMU is spinning off. I've never heard of anyone saying enrollment will shrink . . . |
| Here's the 2013 projections for the three year cap. campaign to house the new students: http://www.fcps.edu/fts/planning/ |
The projections for reduced enrollment in the Langley pyramid are in the latest Capital Improvement Plan. http://www.fcps.edu/fts/planning/cip/cipbook2014-18.pdf Spring Hill, near Tysons, is expected to gain students by 2017. Every other school in the pyramid is expected to lose students. Langley is projected to be under 1,800 students by 2017. The projections may be wrong; FCPS projections often are. But what the FCPS planners are seeing is that fewer people with school-age children want to live, or can afford to live, in western McLean and Great Falls. If the projections are right, FCPS will have to decide whether to operate those schools as smaller schools or redistrict. This doesn't reflect adversely on the quality of the education at those schools, and some people would like their kids to attend schools with fewer students (which is different from schools with smaller classrooms). But it's not the case that people have been so eager to send their kids to Langley in recent years that they've filled it with anywhere close to 2400 students. |
|
Just use Dashboard to compare the out-year projections.
http://www.fcps.edu/fts/dashboard/12-13dashboard.html Use the HS Capacity and Enrollment option and select Langley. The projections are based on the values included in the CIP. |