| Let the EXTREME red-shirting begin. |
This thread is a year old. Last year it was not normed. This year it was. |
| Class action lawsuit crazy person: welcome back! |
|
Oh my God.... People have plenty of time to dig into year-old pile of threads.
Hello Class action lawsuit crazy lady, how do you have so much time to do this? And you want to bring down the whole county school system because your kid didn't get enough score? |
| So, why did Fairfax County have to request its own tailored Cogat? If it's because extreme test prepping were clouding the results, isn't it just a matter of time before it happens with the FAT? Is the slight increase in pool target from last year (130 to 132) an indication that it's happening already? Maybe they should just give one test in 2nd grade and not tell which one your kid will receive (randomly assign FAT, Cogat or NNAT). If an ESOL student gets Cogat or FAT, just give more weight to the non-verbal section. |
I agree... |
disagree |
Why? If your kid goes to AAP in 3rd grade and can't hang with the entire class then they don't belong in that class. Simple. |
| I love it when a parent says that their child "needs to be in AAP.". I "needed to be" at Stanford B School but they did not accept me. I guess I should have appealed! |
Not true. The Cogat scores were not age-normed last year. |
True, and my DS birthday Aug 2 scored 95%. He got in, but should have been age adjusted up on that score. |
The point is he got in, isn't it? Even without the score being adjusted up. So who cares? |
The tests were not normalized for age when FCPS went to there own test for the first year (2012-2013). That was the date of OP. In 2013-2014 and future years, they were age adjusted. The first year, there was not enough data to age adjust with any confidence. |