DP. I mean, William has his own people briefing about how he’s perpetually incandescent or rageful about Harry, Charles, or whatever. And Harry wrote that William was physically violent with him. It is, however, OT. Except for the link to topics Sarah or Andrew could write about. |
This. They all knew. Does anyone believe QEII, and then Charles, got the briefings (financial misdeeds and trafficking) from the secret service and their own protection people, but told absolutely nobody else in the family? It seems really unlikely that the investigation will extend into the coverup, though. |
You nailed it, PP. Nearly verbatim. Well done. |
|
Andrew’s crimes are disguising, all of them. But here’s one of the funnier pieces of fallout, from Tom Sykes, who went to Eton with William and is basically William’s mouthpiece. Sykes in his Royalist Substack wants Charles to make William co-monarch. Charles, who let the police take Andrew away and then issued a cooperation statement, and William, who couldn’t even take time away from his vacation to issue his own statement. Anyway, monarchs are immune from prosecution, and maybe that’s the angle?
Linking here so you can read the original which is behind a Substack paywall. https://www.reddit.com/r/RoyaltyTea/s/nSP8wJBz4l |
I really hope Andrew squeals about Trump. |
If he does squeal about anyone, likely it'll be about one in his own extended royal family |
While that would be a good thing, I'm tempted to think Andrew would throw Trump under the bus before throwing his own family. He still wants Charles to give him a home when he's not in prison. In fact, I could see there being some sort of immunity thing, where Charles gave up William in exchange for the BRF being off-limits. |
I'm confused--what crime would William have committed? And are you proposing just skipping William and going to George once Charles dies? |
+1 And the idea that he would decide to admit any of the sexual stuff at this point - much less implicate anyone else - is absurd. He’ll never come clean about any of that. But at least they got him for something. |
No boo You are out of the loop. This time around Trump's thug FCC is threatening the parent companies of these news shows. They sane wash Trump now AND cover for him But you know this. You are just pretending not to. |
This is my guess |
|
yes maybe but also the lives of those girls hold no value in this world.
its only come out b/c people thought they could weaponize it politically- the actual harm that was done to these girls is collateral -- its just collateral justice instead of damage, but the crimes are besides the point , the only reason any of this is being paid attention to is b/c it is valuable politically which is a sad commentary on how unethical and debased these elites are and how our democracy has failed. politicians SHOULD be scared of losing office and we have had a do nothing congress for 30+ years and we teh people have been allowing theses ppl to ride roughshod over us in teh hopes that some of their power and money will trickle down to us. |
Nah, your the ones spreading actual lies instead of siding with the victims. Vile. |
^^^^ Everything they say is an accusation and I think Andrew's arrest has them cranking up the trolls to muddy the waters |
| Why is this buried in Entertainment and Pop Culture? This is neither unless you're a fan of British tabloids. |