I wouldn’t really describe it as large, just spread out. Stanford is massive and so much of it is everyday used space; meanwhile Amherst is mostly buildings separated far apart and it gets a ton of acreage from unused land. |
Very much doubt it. There’s many LACs with comparable endowments and who have consistently been gaining popularity and competition, even compared to Williams and Amherst. Williams and Amherst are the go to in the future if your search is solely limited to Massachusetts. |
Stanford University is 8,180 acres, 60% of which is totally undeveloped. |
Oh brother. This perspective is so tired. Even this thread’s full throated attempt to marginalize Middlebury is just silly. It’s one of the wealthiest and most selective colleges in the country. Full stop. Does the vibe suit your kid and are you comfortable with cost or aid options? If so, maybe it’s for you. But let’s not pretend it’s teetering on the brink of collapse, or that it’s some directional state school satellite campus in comparison to Williams. These schools are much more alike than they are different. Signed non Mid or Amherst NESCAC parent |
Only 738 acres of Amherst is developed land, so Stanford is still 4x the size of usable space...it's a big place. thanks. |
This is like comparing apples to oranges which makes little sense. Very different schools in very different locations. One is a small liberals arts college in Massachusetts (although with the largest campus of the SLACs) while the other is a large university in California. |
+1 Amherst and Williams both have increasing applicants while Middlebury's is dropping |
I looked at CDS data from Middlebury to get a sense of pre-pandemic numbers. 2019-2020 applications: 9754 2018-2019 applications: 9227 What was it this year? |
Middlebury accepts a huge percentage of their class via early decision. It’s basically the Tulane of LACs in that respect. Students must be deciding not to apply because RD odds are so low. |
Amherst and Williams accept more ED |
No they don't |