[img]
In class? Absolutely. |
I’m one of the other posters and I would also support a laptop ban. For the record, I’m not a part of the union either. That poster spouting off the research about scientists and the union backing lost the respect of most teachers actually in the classroom. |
Many teachers have the students doing class assignments on the laptops during class. |
These anti tech wacko parents have no idea what's actually going on in schools. |
We have a clear eye view of what is happening in classrooms, look at long term trends https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/ltt/2023/ 2012 is when laptops started showing up in high school classes https://www.arlnow.com/2014/08/27/aps-to-give-hs-freshmen-macbooks/ Exactly why is it necessary that class work must be assigned and completed on a computer? |
Clearly others are wondering why we need laptops in class. Students should be issue a laptop to do homework on, as not everyone can afford one. But in the classroom? Not necessary. https://www.washingtonian.com/2025/03/25/schools-are-banning-phones-what-about-laptops/ |
Do you want to go back to horses and buggies too? |
haha you read a few articles and think you know it all. You don't. |
I backed my claim with data and historical reference. You said nothing. |
Exactly. It's totally unrealistic and it doesn't make sense to take away laptops. My DD's teachers have them doing work in class on their laptops. They have block scheduling, and often part of the class is for teaching and part is for doing work/applying what they just learned. They access learning apps, do research, etc., on these laptops. APS has placed restrictions on them, so they can't access much beyond what's required for class. Also, the world is tech based at this point and, honestly, they will use laptops throughout high school and college. SATs, APs - everything is online now. Kids need to learn how to live in a technology-oriented world. I can't even imagine them not having access to this stuff. |
The internet is terrible for doing research. They should be in the library or have a textbook. Learning apps are a complete joke, just a game to babysit while the work with high need kids or grade papers. I’m in tech, you really should see how the leaders in tech are having their own kids learn. https://www.businessinsider.com/sherry-turkle-why-tech-moguls-send-their-kids-to-anti-tech-schools-2017-11?op=1 Maybe that has changed in the last 6 years, but I suspect tech leaders have just gotten quieter about the private schools they send their kids. |
Because we tried it your way and we have overwhelming evidence that kids cannot keep their hands off their phones. They cannot put them down and just use them during non instructional time. They are distracting because companies have designed them that way. And now we as adults need to be step in and recognize that your way failed. |
The internet is terrible for research?? Have you ever heard of google scholar? Even when I was in grad school 15 years ago, most academic journals had moved online. If an elementary kid wants to learn about frogs— I agree, a book is better. But for a HS kid, it’s different. Kids enrolled in AP seminar & research have access to academic journals online the way college kids do. I think books are great, but it depends on what type of information you need, how specific, and how up to date. |
You are talking about curated academic repositories, yes those are very helpful and online access is the standard now. But 90% of students don’t need internet access to write their research paper on the civil war, because they won’t be able to filter though the wall of bad amateur “history” in their “research”. They aren’t looking at academic research like Google scholar, they should be referencing books not RebelBlog(tm). |
+1 Outside agitators trying to stir things up. Let the schools/teachers decide what works best for them. |