Multivariable? That’s what comes after BC at our high school. |
|
Anonymous wrote: Exactly. Princeton, Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Duke, Hopkins do not care about calculus. Take Algebra I, II, Geo/trig. Take precalculus as a senior. That checks the most rigorous box so no need for further. No, it doesn't! Unless you are DEI. You have a point here. Lacrosse, horseback riding, squash and crew crowd with trust funds! |
| The problem with today’s parent is that they believe their kids are all near “4.0” perfect. The irony, neither they, nor their 17 year-old progeny are perfect. |
|
“Colleges ceaselessly repeat the mantra that students should take the “most rigorous courses available to them.” Some students, parents, and even counselors are naive enough to trust them.”
This does not literally taking courses and flunking out or performing miserably. It appears students and teachers need to understand where their “challenge” edge is. Each student has their own subject matter edge. Find it, and operate there. Forget trying to impress with fancy course titles like advance AP BC calculus. If this is beyond your sweet spot edge delay the course until ready. If not, be accountable. |
| I’m coming on here 9 pages late to say my kid is finishing up junior year with Alg 2 and I’m really proud of him. He got an A in Alg 2 and had to work hard for it. He will not take Calculus in HS. He will have his choice of colleges, as will your kid. Obviously, they are not applying to the same colleges. 9 pages of many posters implying this junior getting a C in Calc won’t have many options. - HS teacher who writes colleges recommendations every year |
That would be a year behind the standard math progression at DC’s private school, and my understanding of most private schools in the DMV. Stand is to have geometry in 9, algebra 2 (with or without trig) in 10, precalc in 11, and some level of Calc in 12. Yes, there is a track a year behind that many kids are on, but it’s essentially remedial and would not “check the most rigorous box.” And of course there are honors/AP sections of the standard progression, and there are also kids a year or two advanced who take Calc in 11th or even 10th and then take a year or two of post-Calc math. I was assuming the “advanced calculus” that OP mentions was an honors non-AP class or the equivalent of an AP class in a school that doesn’t offer APs, but others seem to think it’s actually post-AP. It would be helpful for OP to explain what it actually is. |
It could mean ab, bc, Mv or something else. They disappeared and will not clarify. |
And, depending on the child and track that’s very behind public. I find it strange too privates water things down so much especially when they encourage redshirting. Between older kids and getting the brightest they all should be able to handle more. |
| Of note, part of assessment of intellectual capacity, performed by college admission officers is common sense and judgement. Students who do not appreciate their limitations and subject matter edge and take courses ( to impress) in which they perform miserably may repeat this approach in the real world, on the job, where results count. It’s an important experience and lesson we all learn. |
Good for them. Won't help. Up to BC with good grades is all the good schools want. Anything more can also be a negative if they are not involved in a lot of activities especially varsity sports showing they are well rounded. |
Source? |
Great rationalization. I expect way more from privates. |
Y kid applied to an engineering camp. They absolutely wanted higher math. They were declined as not enough engineering stuff. Sports and arts was not enough. |
Summer camps nowadays are DEI camps. They are rejected because they are not FGLI, not because they didn’t take higher math. |
And this is all guesses. |