Pitt Jolie FINALLY reach divorce settlement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have been divorced. They fight was about money and custody and a bunch of the kids are adults. She is horrible to refuse contact.

Adults you say, and they still do not want anything to do with him. Speaks volumes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

What difference would it make? She's been trying to bring him down for years and he's as popular as ever. She probably realizes she won't win in the end. The reputational damage is all hers.

LOL he is not popular as ever. Using his words against is obviously a game changer. Wake up.

Whatever. Look at his career vs hers then come back and tell us who is thriving and who isn't.

DP This is not the flex you think it is. Well, she was a single parent to six children. Ask parents of two children how much their careers take a backseat to active parenting.

Active parenting? lol. How many nannies, sitters, tutors, chefs did they have working for them? By all accounts, she wanted this lifestyle for those kids and herself; he did not.

Even Brad's friends said they were hands on parents as much as they could. It shows. Zahara has Angelina's mannerisms and Pax has some of Brad's.

[Anonymous]

I have an abusive parent, and I still think Angelina is crazy and shouldn't be with the kids. She strikes me as abusive too. The kids should go into foster care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol 😂 finally. Someone posted a link about Giselle and I saw that they signed Christmas day

Angelina did on Christmas, and Brad on the 30th lol. Lots of people saw this coming after she won his correspondences. They'll settle the winery sooner then later so he messages don't leak

Or perhaps she finally settled hoping for an Oscar nom.

Then why wouldn't she settle months ago? That's laughable. He doesn't want his communications out.

I like how his side said he settled because of his gf lol

That’s funny but he’s still an a ss

I find it sad their narrative isnt that he settled for kids but the girfriend instead.

Says a lot about how much he really did not care about his children. It was always a power thing for him. He had the time and money to prolong the matter, requiring Jolie to expend an enormous amount in legal fees. The attorneys always win.

He's starting to let the mask slip with his PR. Today there was an article from his side that side he's upset she didn't sell to him and instead "took the money for herself." How does that make any sense? She would have had the money if she sold to him as well. He's mad he can't control her anymore

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The posts here are crazy. There is literally an FBI report substantiating an extreme, physically and verbally abusive episode where both she and her kids appeared to fear for their physical wellbeing and could not escape. Whether it happened before does not even matter.

If that happened between my husband and I, I would also do anything I could to make sure my kids were NEVER in that situation again, and especially not while they are still children. Alcoholics relapse even after getting sober. I wouldn’t take the chance no matter how reformed he seemed, and I certainly wouldn’t take the chance that I wouldn’t be there to help them.

I cannot imagine feeling any other way as a mother. There is no excusing abuse, and there is no reason she has to forgive him for it. I don’t care if it happened once or repeatedly. There’s a line you cannot cross, and once it’s been crossed, it’s over. Good for her for having always been there for her kids. You can say a lot of things about Angelina and her weird past (especially pre children), but she’s never shown anything but dedication towards her kids.

You are essentially saying you would try to sever your children’s relationship with their father, the way Jolie has done. In the normal world, Brad would have received some sort of custody of his children. Even alcoholics get to see their children, and he got sober. Jolie used her wealth and position as a celebrity to hire a private judge, have him disqualified and upend the normal family law system. I find her quotes about her children learning that some people have too much power and privilege to be held to account to be ironic, because she wouldn’t have achieved what she did in terms of child custody without her power and privilege.

Brad literally has more wealth then her?! You don't think the kids understand the only reason she can fight back for as long as she hass because she has her own privilege and wealth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have an abusive parent, and I still think Angelina is crazy and shouldn't be with the kids. She strikes me as abusive too. The kids should go into foster care.

There are only 2 almost 17 year twins. Troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They have been divorced. They fight was about money and custody and a bunch of the kids are adults. She is horrible to refuse contact.

Custody pretty much done two years ago. All about money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have been divorced. They fight was about money and custody and a bunch of the kids are adults. She is horrible to refuse contact.

Hes horrible for being abusive. She's right for listening to them and protecting them.

He wasn’t abusive to the kids therefore he should have been allowed to see them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

-1
He tried to hit the children.

If someone jumped on your back and kids got too close or tried to intervene on a bumpy ride, I’m sure your arms would be all over the place and someone would accidentally get hit. I suspect this is why the FBI and DCF didn’t press charges. She attacked him first.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was prepping some of the kids ahead of time. “Your dad is mean to me, I fear him”, etc.

No she didn't. He had physical touched her and pushed her down before he went for one of the kids.

He may have just walked up to the kid and screamed at them. So she has no idea what he was going to do. And sometimes a kid deserves a spanking or a slap in the face (I.e., open hand).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have been divorced. They fight was about money and custody and a bunch of the kids are adults. She is horrible to refuse contact.

Adults you say, and they still do not want anything to do with him. Speaks volumes.

They were brainwashed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The posts here are crazy. There is literally an FBI report substantiating an extreme, physically and verbally abusive episode where both she and her kids appeared to fear for their physical wellbeing and could not escape. Whether it happened before does not even matter.

If that happened between my husband and I, I would also do anything I could to make sure my kids were NEVER in that situation again, and especially not while they are still children. Alcoholics relapse even after getting sober. I wouldn’t take the chance no matter how reformed he seemed, and I certainly wouldn’t take the chance that I wouldn’t be there to help them.

I cannot imagine feeling any other way as a mother. There is no excusing abuse, and there is no reason she has to forgive him for it. I don’t care if it happened once or repeatedly. There’s a line you cannot cross, and once it’s been crossed, it’s over. Good for her for having always been there for her kids. You can say a lot of things about Angelina and her weird past (especially pre children), but she’s never shown anything but dedication towards her kids.

You are essentially saying you would try to sever your children’s relationship with their father, the way Jolie has done. In the normal world, Brad would have received some sort of custody of his children. Even alcoholics get to see their children, and he got sober. Jolie used her wealth and position as a celebrity to hire a private judge, have him disqualified and upend the normal family law system. I find her quotes about her children learning that some people have too much power and privilege to be held to account to be ironic, because she wouldn’t have achieved what she did in terms of child custody without her power and privilege.

Brad literally has more wealth then her?! You don't think the kids understand the only reason she can fight back for as long as she hass because she has her own privilege and wealth?

Her atm is drying up. She’s in need of his money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s a nasty piece of work. She’s releasing press about how she wishes Brad would stop attacking her, when she is the one who has been constantly attacking him through her PR people, rehashing the same story over and over again, in a failed and vindictive attempt to ruin her ex’s career.

She never seems to take any responsibility for any of her actions. She acts as if she is a victim of the lawsuit that Brad filed over the winery. However, she is the one who sold to a third party behind his back. She could have at least found an agreeable business partner to sell to, but everything she does is calculated to harm her ex and be as vindictive as possible.

I think she’s basically impossible to live with. Brad turned to alcohol to deal with the toxicity of living with her crazy and controlling self. She can’t be part of a partnership at all, which is why she’s stayed single all of these years.

She sold her part out of spite. He took his GF there for a weekend. Vengeful person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he made a tactical error in not making a very generous financial settlement, very quickly. Things surely would have gone more smoothly if he had, and the chateau sale could have been part of it. It smacks of egotism and control. She's the mother of his six children and he should have been very generous. Just on principle, let alone his gross behavior on the plane.

What does wanting a big lump sum payout say about someone? Did she want money or justice?

I'm not saying she's an angel, far from it. But she was entitled to a huge sum for division of property and child support for six kids over 8 years, and it does seem like he withheld it to punish her for leaving and publicly embarrassing him. And she retaliated by withholding the kids, even when it seemed reasonable he was healthy and ready to co-parent. They both suck.

What kind of mother does this?

I'm sure she rationalized it to herself--he's an awful father and person, the kids were better off with her etc. Like most narcissists do.

I was a little shocked when she had a member of her team basically admit she's been brainwashing the kids to think they had no voice because their father has privilege and power. What? The kids worked with court-appointed therapists, who represented their perspectives in custody proceedings. Only a sadistic mother would want to put her kids through testifying in court. Four are now adults and are free to speak out at any time. At least three seem to have dropped his name, out of loyalty to their mother not because he's been a terrible father as far as we can see. There is no evidence to suggest he deserved to have his parental rights severed. She's a vindictive nutcase who absolutely cannot see the harm she's done to her family (after his initial harm, which while terrible seems to have been short-lived). It's always been about her and what she wants, not what's in the best interest of raising well-adjusted kids who have healthy relationships with both parents.

Here's the quote: “The kids have grown up seeing that some people have so much power and privilege that their voices don’t matter. Their pain doesn’t count,” a source close to the matter shares with Us Weekly.

A good mother would have helped them get past one terrible day eight years ago. Kids are resilient and would have been okay if she encouraged reunification, explaining he was sick but is better now and loved them very much. She wanted them to stew in it because it served her purposes. I can't think of much more horrible parenting than that. Unless there is somehow more to it than that, but I think Wasser would have continued to help her if she felt she was in the right.

The damage she has caused them is irreversible. Probably explains why she has two adult male failures to launch. The rest will be joining them soon.

The one in college seems like she might be okay.

She will ultimately be only employable by Jolie, like the other kids/adults.

BS. She’ll have a college degree and a v strong alumni network. She can work if she wants to.

Yes. Assuming she actually graduates, it seems like Zahara will be the most stable of the bunch. Going to a good school out of the Hollywood craziness and living with fellow students was absolutely the right move. I hope some of the younger kids follow suit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a nasty piece of work. She’s releasing press about how she wishes Brad would stop attacking her, when she is the one who has been constantly attacking him through her PR people, rehashing the same story over and over again, in a failed and vindictive attempt to ruin her ex’s career.

She never seems to take any responsibility for any of her actions. She acts as if she is a victim of the lawsuit that Brad filed over the winery. However, she is the one who sold to a third party behind his back. She could have at least found an agreeable business partner to sell to, but everything she does is calculated to harm her ex and be as vindictive as possible.

I think she’s basically impossible to live with. Brad turned to alcohol to deal with the toxicity of living with her crazy and controlling self. She can’t be part of a partnership at all, which is why she’s stayed single all of these years.

Brad and his sources drag her and the kids weekly as well. "I've always wanted a daughter"

And he got a daughter, how is that statement from years ago an attack?