Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:every single school


+1000
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Omg this sounds awful.

I now understand why no kids from our private go to UCLA or Berkeley


They are great if you are In-state. But definately not worth OOS prices. If I'm paying $60K+, my kid will have smaller class and the ability to get the courses they need when they need them.



Let's be honest. They are not great in-state. The price is right for in-state. And the name is great on the diploma. But the student experience sux.


Except UCLA is an absolute monster when it comes to outlasting literally every other university in the country when it comes to the core student rankings, including quality of life and overall experience.

But yeah, other than that …


Oh for sure. Other than the 5 pages on this thread of complaints. No, definitely.


https://www.niche.com/colleges/university-of-california-los-angeles/

Now show us the schools that are so much better!!!


BHAHAHAHHA!! You're citing Niche?! Hahahahahah!!!!!!!


Cool! Show us the “real” rankings that count now! Niche is trash, so looking forward to seeing the treasure you bring forth to settle this!

Oh, wait - what’s that? The “real” rankings are the ones you see in this thread, comprised of parents whose kids were rejected by UCLA and some fugazi pre-med lecturer who claims that 1,200 student classes are commonplace?


Just curious what you are claiming is not true. Which of the following do you dispute

--UCLA regularly puts three freshmen and/or sophomores in dorm rooms built as doubles

-- There is an even greater housing shortage at the other UCs

-- The list of impacted majors at most UCs include popular majors like computer science, engineering, psychology. . . .

--It is very difficult to transfer into an impacted major

--There are some classes in certain majors with other 1000 students enrolled, at least at Berkeley

--It can be difficult to register for required classes


What about incoming freshman with 50+ units already banked via AP testing and matriculating into a major that’s not impacted? Do they have a chance of graduating in less than six years?


I’d like to know this as well.

Many if not nearly all students come in with a ton of credits. Don't assume that it's that special.

Go take a tour. Ask students about advising, including whether they were assigned a faculty advisor, how often they meet with their advisor, and what input their advisor has provided. Ask students about class registration and how many students graduate in 4 years. Ask about class sizes and quality and if they get feedback on written work product. Go sit in a lecture see who is paying attention or if the lecture is full. See if anyone asks questions. Ask if exams are multiple choice. Ask if cheating is a problem. Ask if there are enough materials for labs or if they run out. Ask about housing. Ask about what students do on weekends. Ask about the political parties and special interest groups in student government. Ask. Ask. Ask.


Holy smokes. These are good.
I’m worried the answers will disappoint me at most flagships.
The best answers would be from SLACs right (other than the weekend question)….


Any private, especially those with less than 10,000 students, are unlikely to have these particular issues.


Right. And there almost invariably a direct correlation to cost. You want to spend $320 - $400K to send your kid to a private with the various associated trade-offs, that’s great. If others make other decisions based on the trade-offs that matter to them, also great.

It’s just that graduating from Macalester or Davidson or Occidental, by way of example, instead of Michigan or Berkeley or UCLA is going to very likely cost you in the long run much more than the higher cost of attendance on the front end.



The oos cost of the UC’s isn’t that far off from a private college. You do realize most of us actually live in the DC area, and not California.

Well, they are still cheaper than UVA or UMichigan. But the larger point applies to all: go private if oos.
Anonymous
Umich poster again. I don’t disagree UC schools don’t have issues (eg housing and class seat buying, and wow seat buying seems like a new extreme). I was trying to clarify that all top tier schools may have or may not have similar issues. Look at the previous post about VTs housing issues in 2019.

Private schools have these issues as much as public. Someone upthread mentioned Middlebury and FEMA trailers. When I toured Cornell on an admitted students day I was told some large intro classes have over 1K in the class.

A comparison in one the presentations I sat through had this information on class sizes:
Berkeley - Data Structures Course had 1500 students (and lucky if you could get in)
Wisconsin Op Systems course - 400 students
Cornell Op Systems course - 500 students
Stanford- average CS class size - 125 students
UT Austin - largest CS class size - 125 students (source: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=--upJd-y_gQ)
It also references a Columbia student who had 200 students in an upper division class after waiting years for smaller class sizes.

This data shows large class size is not just a public vs private issue. Is it a top tier university issue? Maybe. Do your research and figure out what your family is interested in terms of a university education. There are small, personalized campuses if that is what you want.

For me, it’s harder to pay private school tuition rates and have the exact same issues as the typically cheaper public schools.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m struggling to believe some of the antidotal stories.

DC is an incoming freshmen student at UMich. Registration began this week. DC registered yesterday. He had no problem registering for the classes he wanted. CoE if that matters.


I agree. It’s funny how Michigan is lumped in with UC schools as if all publics are exactly the same.


DP

Who’s going to break the bad news to the 240 - 250K applicants each year?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Cornell, USC, NYU, BU (larger privates)
Vs
UCLA, Michigan, Berkeley (extremely large, but highly ranked Publix that are comparable in cost)

Hmmm. I don’t think I would go to any of the California schools to be honest


DP

The cross-admit data that I’ve seen doesn’t seem to align at all with any of the anecdotal noise here …

UCLA 63% vs. Cornell 37%

UCLA 56% vs. USC 44%

UCLA 83% vs. NYU 17%

UCLA 93% vs. BU 7%
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m struggling to believe some of the antidotal stories.

DC is an incoming freshmen student at UMich. Registration began this week. DC registered yesterday. He had no problem registering for the classes he wanted. CoE if that matters.


I agree. It’s funny how Michigan is lumped in with UC schools as if all publics are exactly the same.


My DC is double majoring (Math and CS) with a minor at a top UC and has had no issues so far and is graduating on time. I am glad I was not aware of this site when older DC applied because I woulf not have sent him but his experience has been very good. He is a resourceful kid who could navigate the school despite coming from a very small HS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Cornell, USC, NYU, BU (larger privates)
Vs
UCLA, Michigan, Berkeley (extremely large, but highly ranked Publix that are comparable in cost)

Hmmm. I don’t think I would go to any of the California schools to be honest


DP

The cross-admit data that I’ve seen doesn’t seem to align at all with any of the anecdotal noise here …

UCLA 63% vs. Cornell 37%

UCLA 56% vs. USC 44%

UCLA 83% vs. NYU 17%

UCLA 93% vs. BU 7%


Due to instate price
Anonymous
I feel like people are ignoring the fact that past a certain point, it doesn't really matter how many kids are in a class. Most of the large classes are fact-heavy and most of the hard work and gaining of understanding happens outside of the classroom. The lecture is just an initial overview. Like at a job where you have some up-front meetings but spend a lot of time working independently on your own tasks.

I understand that a lot of people like high-school-sized classes, and those are good for active discussion classes. But I never minded moving to a bigger environment afterwards. I can remember really enjoying a number of classes that were 50-100 students. The large lecture classes I took were mainly 101s that I had to take for distribution requirements (Bio 101/102, Econ 101/102, Calculus). The ones with problem sets had TA-led sections where you could go over all the homework, review the week's topics, etc. It really worked fine. To make an analogy to a local example...is the State of the Union address rendered boring because it's delivered in a large room?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Omg this sounds awful.

I now understand why no kids from our private go to UCLA or Berkeley


My private school DC is at Berkeley and the lower div classes were large but upper div are very manageable. DC is graduating with a double major in STEM. They had great research and internship opportunities ($40k per summer). My DC interned at the same places as HYPMS grads. The school is amazing in terms of STEM and the kids are highly motivated. Anyone who thinks Berkeley or UCLA has subpar students is crazy. Berkeley is a really tough school and its not easy to pass classes if you are not a good student. However, a kid has to be highly motivated to make use of what the school has to offer.


Yes, these schools are in demand and full of bright, talented students who aren’t turned off by the need to hustle. It is not an environment for everyone.


Exactly!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Omg this sounds awful.

I now understand why no kids from our private go to UCLA or Berkeley


They are great if you are In-state. But definately not worth OOS prices. If I'm paying $60K+, my kid will have smaller class and the ability to get the courses they need when they need them.



Let's be honest. They are not great in-state. The price is right for in-state. And the name is great on the diploma. But the student experience sux.


Except UCLA is an absolute monster when it comes to outlasting literally every other university in the country when it comes to the core student rankings, including quality of life and overall experience.

But yeah, other than that …


Oh for sure. Other than the 5 pages on this thread of complaints. No, definitely.


There are complaints about many schools on these boards. Some kids seem to enjoy and thrive in large settings and others in smaill. There are pages of issues listed about LAC, Cornell, Georgetown etc. If you don't want to send your kids to OOS schools that is fine but no need to bring down schools which are world class research institutions and seem tp be working just fine and getting more than 125k applications.


Every school has complaints. No school is exempt from it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hearing disturbing things about overcrowding in dorms/not enough housing at UCLA (3 freshman in a double etc)

Hearing about scheduling/class issues at Michigan, with kids not getting into required 1st year classes for majors etc.

What other schools have these types of issues? What’s the best way to find out?



*Sniff* Poor babies can't deal with the thought of having less closet space, a shared bathroom with running water and a toilet. Life will be soooo hard. *Sniff*
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m struggling to believe some of the antidotal stories.

DC is an incoming freshmen student at UMich. Registration began this week. DC registered yesterday. He had no problem registering for the classes he wanted. CoE if that matters.


I agree. It’s funny how Michigan is lumped in with UC schools as if all publics are exactly the same.


My DC is double majoring (Math and CS) with a minor at a top UC and has had no issues so far and is graduating on time. I am glad I was not aware of this site when older DC applied because I woulf not have sent him but his experience has been very good. He is a resourceful kid who could navigate the school despite coming from a very small HS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m struggling to believe some of the antidotal stories.

DC is an incoming freshmen student at UMich. Registration began this week. DC registered yesterday. He had no problem registering for the classes he wanted. CoE if that matters.


I agree. It’s funny how Michigan is lumped in with UC schools as if all publics are exactly the same.


My DC is double majoring (Math and CS) with a minor at a top UC and has had no issues so far and is graduating on time. I am glad I was not aware of this site when older DC applied because I woulf not have sent him but his experience has been very good. He is a resourceful kid who could navigate the school despite coming from a very small HS.


Nobody should EVER take threads like this seriously nor let it influence their choice of schools. As a PP said above, visit and ask a ton of questions. Talk to current students as much as possible. Most of those blathering on about the hellscapes of the UCs have never stepped foot in CA let alone on one of the campuses. True - the UCs have their blemishes and I agree with those who complain about lack of student advising. That's my biggest complaint and I complained about it strongly on the end of the year parent survey I just submitted. My DC is a senior at UCLA and didn't sit down in person with an actual (not student) advisor until getting admitted into her major Junior year. But her undergraduate experience has been NOTHING like what everyone is posting here. Seriously. Nothing. Largest class was around 200 but those were online her freshman year because of Covid. Double major and is graduating on-time, as are all of her friends/roommates, etc.

It's not a school for students who need hand-holding and can't hustle. I've met a ton of DD's friends and classmates and they are incredibly smart, ambitious go-getters.

Oh - and the selling of seats in classes gave my DD a hearty laugh!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Cornell, USC, NYU, BU (larger privates)
Vs
UCLA, Michigan, Berkeley (extremely large, but highly ranked Publix that are comparable in cost)

Hmmm. I don’t think I would go to any of the California schools to be honest


DP

The cross-admit data that I’ve seen doesn’t seem to align at all with any of the anecdotal noise here …

UCLA 63% vs. Cornell 37%

UCLA 56% vs. USC 44%

UCLA 83% vs. NYU 17%

UCLA 93% vs. BU 7%


Due to instate price


The data isn’t confined to CA applicants. Cross-admitted applicants simply choose UCLA by a significant margin.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Cornell, USC, NYU, BU (larger privates)
Vs
UCLA, Michigan, Berkeley (extremely large, but highly ranked Publix that are comparable in cost)

Hmmm. I don’t think I would go to any of the California schools to be honest


DP

The cross-admit data that I’ve seen doesn’t seem to align at all with any of the anecdotal noise here …

UCLA 63% vs. Cornell 37%

UCLA 56% vs. USC 44%

UCLA 83% vs. NYU 17%

UCLA 93% vs. BU 7%


Due to instate price


The data isn’t confined to CA applicants. Cross-admitted applicants simply choose UCLA by a significant margin.


80 percent of ucla students are Californians. One wouldn’t expect them to be picking the more expensive cross country option.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: