Sheryl Sandberg Releases Screams Before Silence, A Free Documentary About the Sexual Violence on October 7

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:American Israelis?

Hey what did you do what IDF assassinated an American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh? And an American teenager in the West Bank? Were you all like, IDF must surrender? Nope. You were not.

All this says is you want continued war until one of the groups is extinguished. My guess if you’re hoping Israel ceases to exist. You’re not for peace or a true ceasefire.

Right.

This is a tried and true tactic called "yorim ve bochim". I cry as I shoot you.

All this says you want Israeli crimes to be ignored or whitewashed.

Which group did Shireen Abu Akleh belong to? A global journalist superstar? An American citizen? A Christian, for god's sake, since it's apparently important to some of you? Tell me.

You’re still not calling for peace. You have a lot of excuses to continue a war. Your calls for a ceasefire as not legitimate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:American Israelis?

Hey what did you do what IDF assassinated an American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh? And an American teenager in the West Bank? Were you all like, IDF must surrender? Nope. You were not.

All this says is you want continued war until one of the groups is extinguished. My guess if you’re hoping Israel ceases to exist. You’re not for peace or a true ceasefire.

Right.

This is a tried and true tactic called "yorim ve bochim". I cry as I shoot you.

All this says you want Israeli crimes to be ignored or whitewashed.

Which group did Shireen Abu Akleh belong to? A global journalist superstar? An American citizen? A Christian, for god's sake, since it's apparently important to some of you? Tell me.

You’re still not calling for peace. You have a lot of excuses to continue a war. Your calls for a ceasefire as not legitimate.

I'll figure out what to call for without your input, thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:American Israelis?

Hey what did you do what IDF assassinated an American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh? And an American teenager in the West Bank? Were you all like, IDF must surrender? Nope. You were not.

All this says is you want continued war until one of the groups is extinguished. My guess if you’re hoping Israel ceases to exist. You’re not for peace or a true ceasefire.

Right.

This is a tried and true tactic called "yorim ve bochim". I cry as I shoot you.

All this says you want Israeli crimes to be ignored or whitewashed.

Which group did Shireen Abu Akleh belong to? A global journalist superstar? An American citizen? A Christian, for god's sake, since it's apparently important to some of you? Tell me.

You’re still not calling for peace. You have a lot of excuses to continue a war. Your calls for a ceasefire as not legitimate.

I'll figure out what to call for without your input, thanks.

Let me guess. You want an intifada. Once again you have no interest in peace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:American Israelis?

Hey what did you do what IDF assassinated an American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh? And an American teenager in the West Bank? Were you all like, IDF must surrender? Nope. You were not.

All this says is you want continued war until one of the groups is extinguished. My guess if you’re hoping Israel ceases to exist. You’re not for peace or a true ceasefire.

Right.

This is a tried and true tactic called "yorim ve bochim". I cry as I shoot you.

All this says you want Israeli crimes to be ignored or whitewashed.

Which group did Shireen Abu Akleh belong to? A global journalist superstar? An American citizen? A Christian, for god's sake, since it's apparently important to some of you? Tell me.

You’re still not calling for peace. You have a lot of excuses to continue a war. Your calls for a ceasefire as not legitimate.

I'll figure out what to call for without your input, thanks.

Let me guess. You want an intifada. Once again you have no interest in peace.

You should kill more journalists. Definitely. The more globally famous, the better. Blame it on Palestinians, then, when it is proven it was IDF, begin stonewalling. Dead journalists. That's what we need. That will really speed up the peace process!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:American Israelis?

Hey what did you do what IDF assassinated an American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh? And an American teenager in the West Bank? Were you all like, IDF must surrender? Nope. You were not.

All this says is you want continued war until one of the groups is extinguished. My guess if you’re hoping Israel ceases to exist. You’re not for peace or a true ceasefire.

Right.

This is a tried and true tactic called "yorim ve bochim". I cry as I shoot you.

All this says you want Israeli crimes to be ignored or whitewashed.

Which group did Shireen Abu Akleh belong to? A global journalist superstar? An American citizen? A Christian, for god's sake, since it's apparently important to some of you? Tell me.

You’re still not calling for peace. You have a lot of excuses to continue a war. Your calls for a ceasefire as not legitimate.

I'll figure out what to call for without your input, thanks.

Let me guess. You want an intifada. Once again you have no interest in peace.

You should kill more journalists. Definitely. The more globally famous, the better. Blame it on Palestinians, then, when it is proven it was IDF, begin stonewalling. Dead journalists. That's what we need. That will really speed up the peace process!

You are blood thirsty. If you want a ceasefire stop rehashing problems and just end the war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was no mass rape from Hamas or the IDF during this war . Neither Israel and Hamas mass rape
If there were mass rapes, the medical centers would be full and lots of abortions or contraceptions would be needed .

One of the Israeli hostages got a nose job once released because she was surprised her captors didn’t rape her.
S
There were no Hamas sex slaves or harems brides made of these hostages contrary to israeli expectation

I thought about reporting your disgusting post, but I think it's so much more instructive to leave it up for all to see. The UN has verified that there were indeed mass sex crimes, in addition to murders, committed on Oct. 7. Are you calling the UN a liar? Nevermind, I honestly don't want a further look into the mind of a psycho propagandist.

Oh, and by the way? Your sheer stupidity is staggering - these women were not only raped, they were murdered. Some were murdered first - THEN raped. So don't you worry - no need for abortions or contraceptives. JFC.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147217
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-un-rape-oct7-hamas-gaza-fe1a35767a63666fe4dc1c97e397177e

The UN didn't "verify" it. The UN mission to Israel did not include its investigative arm, and in fact Israel has expressly declined an independent investigation the UN offered to conduct. It was not within their remit to verify. This is why the report says "clear and convincing information" rather than "clear and convincing evidence." The report is also quite clear that all the information it cites came from the Israeli government.

A UN team was invited BY ISRAEL to come. The fact that you are splitting hairs in a desperate attempt to clear Hamas (???) of these heinous acts speaks volumes about you. Why on earth are you defending a terrorist group? What is wrong with you?

Pramila Patten added in a press release issued along with the report that there are also reasonable grounds to believe that such violence, which includes other “cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment”, may be continuing against those still being held by Hamas and other extremists in the Gaza Strip.

The report from her Office arose from an official visit to Israel at the invitation of the Government which included a visit to the occupied West Bank, between 29 January and 14 February.

In the context of the coordinated attack by Hamas and others of 7 October, the UN mission team found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations, including rape and gang rape in at least three locations in southern Israel.

The team also found a pattern of victims - mostly women - found fully or partially naked, bound and shot across multiple locations which “may be indicative of some forms of sexual violence”.

The mission made up of Ms. Patten and nine experts – which was not investigative in nature – conducted 33 meetings with Israeli representatives, examining more than 5,000 photographic images and 50 hours of video footage. It conducted 34 confidential interviews including with survivors and witnesses of the 7 October attacks, released hostages, first responders and others.

Thanks for making my point so please stop saying "the UN investigated and found..."

The UN listened to what Israel said and watched what Israel showed them.

You are an idiot. Do continue believing whatever the hell you want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was no mass rape from Hamas or the IDF during this war . Neither Israel and Hamas mass rape
If there were mass rapes, the medical centers would be full and lots of abortions or contraceptions would be needed .

One of the Israeli hostages got a nose job once released because she was surprised her captors didn’t rape her.
S
There were no Hamas sex slaves or harems brides made of these hostages contrary to israeli expectation

OP here. You sound like someone who should watch the free documentary with your friends. Then come back and tells us about the plot holes you found: https://www.screamsbeforesilence.com

+ a million
Not to mention, the PP should definitely watch the go-pro video footage shot by Hamas themselves, which journalists watched - until they couldn't.

https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-attack-military-war-a8f63b07641212f0de61861844e5e71e
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/idf-shows-journalists-raw-footage-of-the-october-7-hamas-terror-attack-196413509960
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67198270

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it so hard to believe a terrorist organization who murdered and kidnapped children, seniors and women while on drugs raped women too? Like they’re too good or pious to rape? Do you think Hamas has any dignity? Do you find them honorable in some way?

Because every armed group has its own handwriting, and Hamas’ has never included rape. I’m sure there was opportunistic rape but I don’t believe rape was premeditated or used az a weapon.

DP. Your handwriting appears to be stupidity.

Two United Nations human rights experts said on Jan. 8, 2024, that there was growing evidence of Hamas’ use of sexual violence against people on Oct. 7, 2023 – and that the attacks on civilians likely amount to crimes against humanity.

“As armed Palestinian groups rampaged through communities in Israel bordering the Gaza strip, thousands of people were subjected to targeted and brutal attacks, the vast majority of whom were civilians,” Alice Jill Edwards, an independent expert on torture, and Morris Tidball-Binz, an expert on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, said in a statement. “The growing body of evidence about reported sexual violence is particularly harrowing.”

The United Nations, women’s groups and human rights groups previously faced criticism for not quickly condemning Hamas fighters for raping and sexually violating Israelis during the Oct. 7, 2023, attack.

There is strong evidence that Hamas committed sexual violence, including eyewitnesses’ and first responders’ testimony, medical assessments of released hostages and independent investigations from media outlets such as The New York Times. This includes rape, gang rape, sexual torture and sexual mutilation of Israelis of diverse genders and ages.

https://theconversation.com/hamas-use-of-sexual-violence-is-an-all-too-common-part-of-modern-war-but-not-in-all-conflicts-219301

"First responders"? You mean the ZAKA thugs? The men who gave us the legend of forty babies and pregnant women sliced open?

The NYT piece on rape was debunked and its writer fired.

But don't let the facts interfere with a good story.

So ONE anecdote was called into question, and you're actually insisting all of the other reporting about sexual atrocities was fake? No one is talking about ZAKA, your apparent obsession. The UN has confirmed the rapes. You truly need some meds and/or therapy. Maybe join Propaganda Anonymous?

In this case, there is a large volume of evidence to indicate that Hamas carried out sexual assaults during the October 7 attack. But the Times, by opening its story with an anecdote later called into question by the victim’s family, along with the troubling actions of a freelancer, has left critics with plenty of material to sow doubt.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/01/media/ny-times-stands-by-reporting-hamas/index.html

ZAKA is what the media called "first responders", without bothering to clarify they have no coronary or investigative qualifications.

That wasn't in the way of them telling tales to the media replicated thousands of times around the world in the first few weeks after Oct. 7.

Be honest and admit how much rage the utterly, totally manufactured story of forty beheaded babies has generated. Admit it.

Funny how you can't bear to admit all of the other confirmations:

There is strong evidence that Hamas committed sexual violence, including eyewitnesses’ and first responders’ testimony, medical assessments of released hostages and independent investigations from media outlets such as The New York Times. This includes rape, gang rape, sexual torture and sexual mutilation of Israelis of diverse genders and ages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it so hard to believe a terrorist organization who murdered and kidnapped children, seniors and women while on drugs raped women too? Like they’re too good or pious to rape? Do you think Hamas has any dignity? Do you find them honorable in some way?

Because every armed group has its own handwriting, and Hamas’ has never included rape. I’m sure there was opportunistic rape but I don’t believe rape was premeditated or used az a weapon.

DP. Your handwriting appears to be stupidity.

Two United Nations human rights experts said on Jan. 8, 2024, that there was growing evidence of Hamas’ use of sexual violence against people on Oct. 7, 2023 – and that the attacks on civilians likely amount to crimes against humanity.

“As armed Palestinian groups rampaged through communities in Israel bordering the Gaza strip, thousands of people were subjected to targeted and brutal attacks, the vast majority of whom were civilians,” Alice Jill Edwards, an independent expert on torture, and Morris Tidball-Binz, an expert on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, said in a statement. “The growing body of evidence about reported sexual violence is particularly harrowing.”

The United Nations, women’s groups and human rights groups previously faced criticism for not quickly condemning Hamas fighters for raping and sexually violating Israelis during the Oct. 7, 2023, attack.

There is strong evidence that Hamas committed sexual violence, including eyewitnesses’ and first responders’ testimony, medical assessments of released hostages and independent investigations from media outlets such as The New York Times. This includes rape, gang rape, sexual torture and sexual mutilation of Israelis of diverse genders and ages.

https://theconversation.com/hamas-use-of-sexual-violence-is-an-all-too-common-part-of-modern-war-but-not-in-all-conflicts-219301

"First responders"? You mean the ZAKA thugs? The men who gave us the legend of forty babies and pregnant women sliced open?

The NYT piece on rape was debunked and its writer fired.

But don't let the facts interfere with a good story.

So ONE anecdote was called into question, and you're actually insisting all of the other reporting about sexual atrocities was fake? No one is talking about ZAKA, your apparent obsession. The UN has confirmed the rapes. You truly need some meds and/or therapy. Maybe join Propaganda Anonymous?

In this case, there is a large volume of evidence to indicate that Hamas carried out sexual assaults during the October 7 attack. But the Times, by opening its story with an anecdote later called into question by the victim’s family, along with the troubling actions of a freelancer, has left critics with plenty of material to sow doubt.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/01/media/ny-times-stands-by-reporting-hamas/index.html

ZAKA is what the media called "first responders", without bothering to clarify they have no coronary or investigative qualifications.

That wasn't in the way of them telling tales to the media replicated thousands of times around the world in the first few weeks after Oct. 7.

Be honest and admit how much rage the utterly, totally manufactured story of forty beheaded babies has generated. Admit it.

Funny how you can't bear to admit all of the other confirmations:

There is strong evidence that Hamas committed sexual violence, including eyewitnesses’ and first responders’ testimony, medical assessments of released hostages and independent investigations from media outlets such as The New York Times. This includes rape, gang rape, sexual torture and sexual mutilation of Israelis of diverse genders and ages.

You are aware that the NYT "independent investigation" was debunked and its writer fired? Are you?

[Anonymous]

Israel needs better representatives. People like Sheryl Sandberg, Bill Ackman, and Jonathan Greenblatt are such nakedly biased, hyperaggressive borderline racists. They bring the whole October 7 cause into disrepute and make the Palestinian cause even more sympathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:American Israelis?

Hey what did you do what IDF assassinated an American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh? And an American teenager in the West Bank? Were you all like, IDF must surrender? Nope. You were not.

All this says is you want continued war until one of the groups is extinguished. My guess if you’re hoping Israel ceases to exist. You’re not for peace or a true ceasefire.

Right.

This is a tried and true tactic called "yorim ve bochim". I cry as I shoot you.

All this says you want Israeli crimes to be ignored or whitewashed.

Which group did Shireen Abu Akleh belong to? A global journalist superstar? An American citizen? A Christian, for god's sake, since it's apparently important to some of you? Tell me.

You’re still not calling for peace. You have a lot of excuses to continue a war. Your calls for a ceasefire as not legitimate.

I'll figure out what to call for without your input, thanks.

Let me guess. You want an intifada. Once again you have no interest in peace.

You should kill more journalists. Definitely. The more globally famous, the better. Blame it on Palestinians, then, when it is proven it was IDF, begin stonewalling. Dead journalists. That's what we need. That will really speed up the peace process!

You are blood thirsty. If you want a ceasefire stop rehashing problems and just end the war.

LOL IDF is raining bullets on global media stars and I'm the bloodthirsty one?

I will pass along the message to Abu Akleh's family that a DCUM rando would like them to shut up and stop rehashing problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was no mass rape from Hamas or the IDF during this war . Neither Israel and Hamas mass rape
If there were mass rapes, the medical centers would be full and lots of abortions or contraceptions would be needed .

One of the Israeli hostages got a nose job once released because she was surprised her captors didn’t rape her.
S
There were no Hamas sex slaves or harems brides made of these hostages contrary to israeli expectation

I thought about reporting your disgusting post, but I think it's so much more instructive to leave it up for all to see. The UN has verified that there were indeed mass sex crimes, in addition to murders, committed on Oct. 7. Are you calling the UN a liar? Nevermind, I honestly don't want a further look into the mind of a psycho propagandist.

Oh, and by the way? Your sheer stupidity is staggering - these women were not only raped, they were murdered. Some were murdered first - THEN raped. So don't you worry - no need for abortions or contraceptives. JFC.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147217
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-un-rape-oct7-hamas-gaza-fe1a35767a63666fe4dc1c97e397177e

The UN didn't "verify" it. The UN mission to Israel did not include its investigative arm, and in fact Israel has expressly declined an independent investigation the UN offered to conduct. It was not within their remit to verify. This is why the report says "clear and convincing information" rather than "clear and convincing evidence." The report is also quite clear that all the information it cites came from the Israeli government.

A UN team was invited BY ISRAEL to come. The fact that you are splitting hairs in a desperate attempt to clear Hamas (???) of these heinous acts speaks volumes about you. Why on earth are you defending a terrorist group? What is wrong with you?

Pramila Patten added in a press release issued along with the report that there are also reasonable grounds to believe that such violence, which includes other “cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment”, may be continuing against those still being held by Hamas and other extremists in the Gaza Strip.

The report from her Office arose from an official visit to Israel at the invitation of the Government which included a visit to the occupied West Bank, between 29 January and 14 February.

In the context of the coordinated attack by Hamas and others of 7 October, the UN mission team found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations, including rape and gang rape in at least three locations in southern Israel.

The team also found a pattern of victims - mostly women - found fully or partially naked, bound and shot across multiple locations which “may be indicative of some forms of sexual violence”.

The mission made up of Ms. Patten and nine experts – which was not investigative in nature – conducted 33 meetings with Israeli representatives, examining more than 5,000 photographic images and 50 hours of video footage. It conducted 34 confidential interviews including with survivors and witnesses of the 7 October attacks, released hostages, first responders and others.

Thanks for making my point so please stop saying "the UN investigated and found..."

The UN listened to what Israel said and watched what Israel showed them.

You are an idiot. Do continue believing whatever the hell you want.

At this minute I believe the UN press release, the very same one you cited, that says in black and white the mission was not investigative in nature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it so hard to believe a terrorist organization who murdered and kidnapped children, seniors and women while on drugs raped women too? Like they’re too good or pious to rape? Do you think Hamas has any dignity? Do you find them honorable in some way?

You can see in previous comments that yes, they do find them honorable in some ways. Also, those people hate Jews. Sorry, I mean "Zionists" - they hate Zionists. But totally don't hate Jews. It's just they are rather gleeful when Jews are kidnapped, raped, and murdered.

Did Hamas attack anyone who wasn’t Israeli? I’m pretty sure they don’t give a crap about most of the world’s Jews. They just care about the people who violently attacked, killed, and robbed them of their land in 1948 and have made the decades since more and more awful.

Conflating Zionists or Israelis with Jews is antisemitism. Stop using innocent Jews to justify your hatred and violence.

Hamas killed 71 non Israeli citizens. Does anyone remember the horrific video of a Thai man being hacked to death with garden tools? They’re currently holding 5 Americans hostage. If this was truly just about Israel why hold them? They are an our and out terrorist group and hate all Jews. Stop the Zionism bs.

+1. Hamas is a terrorist organization. The folks defending Hamas and blaming Jews are wrong.

+2
Not only are they wrong, they are beyond deranged.

The deranged people are those who claim mass rape but cannot produce a single piece of evidence.

What was Hamas doing at the music festival? Dancing and enjoying the show? You are deranged, just like the death cult you are defending.

+1
The Hamas defender on this thread is beyond anything I've seen... just incredibly disgusting.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67198270

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was no mass rape from Hamas or the IDF during this war . Neither Israel and Hamas mass rape
If there were mass rapes, the medical centers would be full and lots of abortions or contraceptions would be needed .

One of the Israeli hostages got a nose job once released because she was surprised her captors didn’t rape her.
S
There were no Hamas sex slaves or harems brides made of these hostages contrary to israeli expectation

I thought about reporting your disgusting post, but I think it's so much more instructive to leave it up for all to see. The UN has verified that there were indeed mass sex crimes, in addition to murders, committed on Oct. 7. Are you calling the UN a liar? Nevermind, I honestly don't want a further look into the mind of a psycho propagandist.

Oh, and by the way? Your sheer stupidity is staggering - these women were not only raped, they were murdered. Some were murdered first - THEN raped. So don't you worry - no need for abortions or contraceptives. JFC.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147217
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-un-rape-oct7-hamas-gaza-fe1a35767a63666fe4dc1c97e397177e

The UN didn't "verify" it. The UN mission to Israel did not include its investigative arm, and in fact Israel has expressly declined an independent investigation the UN offered to conduct. It was not within their remit to verify. This is why the report says "clear and convincing information" rather than "clear and convincing evidence." The report is also quite clear that all the information it cites came from the Israeli government.

A UN team was invited BY ISRAEL to come. The fact that you are splitting hairs in a desperate attempt to clear Hamas (???) of these heinous acts speaks volumes about you. Why on earth are you defending a terrorist group? What is wrong with you?

Pramila Patten added in a press release issued along with the report that there are also reasonable grounds to believe that such violence, which includes other “cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment”, may be continuing against those still being held by Hamas and other extremists in the Gaza Strip.

The report from her Office arose from an official visit to Israel at the invitation of the Government which included a visit to the occupied West Bank, between 29 January and 14 February.

In the context of the coordinated attack by Hamas and others of 7 October, the UN mission team found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations, including rape and gang rape in at least three locations in southern Israel.

The team also found a pattern of victims - mostly women - found fully or partially naked, bound and shot across multiple locations which “may be indicative of some forms of sexual violence”.

The mission made up of Ms. Patten and nine experts – which was not investigative in nature – conducted 33 meetings with Israeli representatives, examining more than 5,000 photographic images and 50 hours of video footage. It conducted 34 confidential interviews including with survivors and witnesses of the 7 October attacks, released hostages, first responders and others.

Thanks for making my point so please stop saying "the UN investigated and found..."

The UN listened to what Israel said and watched what Israel showed them.

You are an idiot. Do continue believing whatever the hell you want.

At this minute I believe the UN press release, the very same one you cited, that says in black and white the mission was not investigative in nature.

Pretty astounding that "clear and convincing evidence" from the UN isn't enough for you, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised. I mean, you're doing a great job of defending Hamas, so congrats?

Pramila Patten added in a press release issued along with the report that there are also reasonable grounds to believe that such violence, which includes other “cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment”, may be continuing against those still being held by Hamas and other extremists in the Gaza Strip.

The report from her Office arose from an official visit to Israel at the invitation of the Government which included a visit to the occupied West Bank, between 29 January and 14 February.

In the context of the coordinated attack by Hamas and others of 7 October, the UN mission team found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations, including rape and gang rape in at least three locations in southern Israel.

The team also found a pattern of victims - mostly women - found fully or partially naked, bound and shot across multiple locations which “may be indicative of some forms of sexual violence”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:American Israelis?

Hey what did you do what IDF assassinated an American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh? And an American teenager in the West Bank? Were you all like, IDF must surrender? Nope. You were not.

All this says is you want continued war until one of the groups is extinguished. My guess if you’re hoping Israel ceases to exist. You’re not for peace or a true ceasefire.

Right.

This is a tried and true tactic called "yorim ve bochim". I cry as I shoot you.

All this says you want Israeli crimes to be ignored or whitewashed.

Which group did Shireen Abu Akleh belong to? A global journalist superstar? An American citizen? A Christian, for god's sake, since it's apparently important to some of you? Tell me.

You’re still not calling for peace. You have a lot of excuses to continue a war. Your calls for a ceasefire as not legitimate.

I'll figure out what to call for without your input, thanks.

Let me guess. You want an intifada. Once again you have no interest in peace.

You should kill more journalists. Definitely. The more globally famous, the better. Blame it on Palestinians, then, when it is proven it was IDF, begin stonewalling. Dead journalists. That's what we need. That will really speed up the peace process!

You are blood thirsty. If you want a ceasefire stop rehashing problems and just end the war.

LOL IDF is raining bullets on global media stars and I'm the bloodthirsty one?

I will pass along the message to Abu Akleh's family that a DCUM rando would like them to shut up and stop rehashing problems.

Please do.