Wanting a lot of kids is fine. Not wanting a lot of kids is fine. Saying people should have a lot of kids is gross and creepy. |
Standards of living were lower, people could get decent jobs and provide for their own families just by being HS graduates, never mind college graduates. 100 years ago there were very few “suburbs,” so if you lived in a city - not even in a high rise building right downtown, I’m thinking of places like Detroit where there were lots of single family homes in the city - you could take streetcars or walk everywhere and not have to think too much about transportation for your family of 4+ kids and 2 adults and maybe whatever older single/widowed relative was also living with you. It didn’t matter if your home had 3 bedrooms and 1 bath because that’s what was expected and kids shared. No paying for expensive after school activities - they just didn’t exist outside of middle and HS clubs and sports. People didn’t have big wardrobes or technology besides a family radio. Everyone was living just about the same life as each other apart from the very rich, and most people had no exposure to them so no one knew. Now if you have 4+ kids and you want to give them the same life as their 2 kid family peers, it costs $$$$ and the logistics are so complicated. I mean if you have a partner who makes big bucks in a high paid career, great, go for it, but that’s not most people. And if you don’t care about giving them the same lives/opportunities, that creates its own issues. The kids who are being “homeschooled” while mom and dad make RV/bus/van life content for IG aren’t going to have nearly the same opportunities as young adults as the kid who goes to regular school and learns an instrument and takes AP classes and is on the school robotics team. |
You don't know families with money. And you are so wrong. |
It wasn’t fine “back then.” Especially since many of the women having back-to-back babies had no choice due to religious pressure and/or lack of birth control. There’s a reason that as soon as birth control becomes available, family size drops. |
We have definitely observed that parents of four and more are the happiest and most relaxed parents. We stopped at three so I guess we chose the unhappiest route! It was hard when they were younger but I love our family. |
Two nearly brought me to an early grave. There is no way I could have parented four. |
I have and love a large family. This guy is an idiot! He doesn't speak for most of us.
The only sentiments I agree with regarding the article is that you tend to be more relaxed and anti-travel sports culture once you get towards the end of the line. I do agree the crazy competitive culture is not good for kids. Like everything, it's a balance. My kids don't do crap around the house and they aren't up early parenting their siblings on Saturday morning, that is for sure. They're texting me from their room to tell the little ones to keep it down and that's the most interaction they have Saturday morning (as it should be!) |
You clearly know no one with money if you think there aren’t families with multiple kids who do and have everything-multimillion $ house, fully funded college, private school, travel with all kids. That’s why they have tons of kids..because they know they can afford it. |
Why should your kids sit in their rooms texting instead of interacting with their family? That’s your example of how it should be? Not speaking to childcare responsibilities, but kids absolutely benefit from contributing to the household via substantial chores. Treating our kids like little royalty is not healthy. I have three and can see both sides of this debate. |
If you can see both sides, then you should be able to see that kids need their alone time just like adults and in a large family, there is less of that. Saturday morning seems like a good time to have downtime and not be forced to interact with your siblings. Sucks to be an introvert in a large family, esp if you are the oldest and are expected to interact (take care of the younger ones) all the time. Agree with you about the chores though those chores should not include parenting younger siblings. The parents chose to have the large family, not the older sibs. They should be changing the diapers on Saturday morning. |
He doesn't consider finances or impact on parents' careers? That's pretty worthless analysis then. |
NP. Different scenario, because we have an only child, but Saturday mornings where we all just hang out in different rooms reading are the best. |
I definitely believe you that it’s easier for the parents. However, I would never want to force my older children to parent my younger ones. If I was sleeping in while my 12 year old changed my toddler, I would consider that a fail. A family structure that requires any child to act like a mini adult is depressing AF. |
If you've always craved the power and adoration afforded to cult leaders, but don't have the natural charisma to gain followers of your own...have 4+ kids instead.
But seriously, folks, this article just promotes the age-old parenting technique called "neglect." You can do neglect with any number of offspring, but at the 4+ range it just happens naturally. Parents who have large families always say they are doing it for the kids, but in reality, they are doing it for themselves. The power, attention, adoration, etc is unparalleled. All the kids' needs come secondary to the parents'. |
But the flip side is the more pregnancies and the more breast feeding the less risk of breast cancer |