Would you date a man with a 140 body count?

[Anonymous]

If he killed 140 people I would assume I’d be next.

[Anonymous]

That would be a turn-off for me for either gender.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men’s penis does not get loose. Women get blown out like that end up with disgusting looking old baggy pu$$y.

So women should have sx less than 140 times in life lest their vg sags? You sound smart

[Anonymous]

idk if i would date someone who uses the term 'body count' (feels VERY gen x)

i would def not date someone who told me they slept with 140 ppl. such cringe. no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men’s penis does not get loose. Women get blown out like that end up with disgusting looking old baggy pu$$y.

Imagine knowing this little about a woman's body and then getting mad about it. LOL OMG

[Anonymous]

I'm a guy so I wouldn't date a guy...but wouldn't date a women who has 20 let alone 120 or 140.

Ideally under 7 and I have met women my age where that is the case and they seem to be the more well adjusted ones.

I once dated a women who was like...if we talk about that it's not a constructive conversation. She didn't have to tell me a number I assumed it was high if that's her response. Fair enough she doesn't have to say, but I will judge and I did. I hooked up with her until she got boring and then moved on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:idk if i would date someone who uses the term 'body count' (feels VERY gen x)

i would def not date someone who told me they slept with 140 ppl. such cringe. no.

+1 to both points

[Anonymous]

No.

I don’t want to be used or catch a disease.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why or why not?

No.

But i'm a dude so it would have been no no matter the number.

I know for some women that would make him more attractive. If he's good enough for 140 other women then odds are he would be good for. you

[Anonymous]

"My single male friend in his 40s is probably at that number. It isn’t so ridiculous if your are a good looking bachelor. He’s had a few long terms monogamous relationships, but on the whole has probably been single 16ish of the last 25 years. That’s less than 10 a year for a guy who could meeting someone on tinder and have sex every day."

+1

I know somebody who didn't marry till he was in his early 30s and so was single for over a decade. Married his first girlfriend after about 6 months. Before that, he intentionally was not exclusive with anyone because he knew he wasn't interested in settling down. He was faithful to his wife throughout their marriage of about 10 years. Divorced in his early 40s, which was about 10 years ago. He's very good-looking, a good dancer, and outgoing, so he never went out to a club or bar without finding someone who would go home with him for the night, although they weren't always his ideal woman. He says he turned down offers for ONSs on a regular basis because he prefers to be the one doing the asking. I asked him once how many women he'd slept with and he had no idea, so I did some quick back-of-the-envelope math and we estimated it had to be at least 100. He was out of his parent's house for at least 12 years during the prime recreational sex years of life, which is about 144 months. If he'd met and slept with a new woman every six weeks or so, he'd have hit 100 easily. He is someone who always imagined that he'd get married one day, and when he decided he wanted that, he acted on it and did it. And he stayed faithful. It isn't always that case that someone with a high body count has an intimacy problem. And those with high body counts don't all keep track of their count. Now that he's divorced in his fifties and still nice looking/fit, he could easily have sex with a new woman monthly.

[Anonymous]

If the guy gets tested for STDs, why would you worry about catching something from him regardless of how many past partners he's had?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:idk if i would date someone who uses the term 'body count' (feels VERY gen x)

i would def not date someone who told me they slept with 140 ppl.

such cringe.

no.

Ironic because this phrase sounds so dated elder millennial

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the guy gets tested for STDs, why would you worry about catching something from him regardless of how many past partners he's had?

Because men are not tested but do carry many unpleasant STDs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"My single male friend in his 40s is probably at that number. It isn’t so ridiculous if your are a good looking bachelor. He’s had a few long terms monogamous relationships, but on the whole has probably been single 16ish of the last 25 years. That’s less than 10 a year for a guy who could meeting someone on tinder and have sex every day."

+1

I know somebody who didn't marry till he was in his early 30s and so was single for over a decade. Married his first girlfriend after about 6 months. Before that, he intentionally was not exclusive with anyone because he knew he wasn't interested in settling down. He was faithful to his wife throughout their marriage of about 10 years. Divorced in his early 40s, which was about 10 years ago. He's very good-looking, a good dancer, and outgoing, so he never went out to a club or bar without finding someone who would go home with him for the night, although they weren't always his ideal woman. He says he turned down offers for ONSs on a regular basis because he prefers to be the one doing the asking. I asked him once how many women he'd slept with and he had no idea, so I did some quick back-of-the-envelope math and we estimated it had to be at least 100. He was out of his parent's house for at least 12 years during the prime recreational sex years of life, which is about 144 months. If he'd met and slept with a new woman every six weeks or so, he'd have hit 100 easily. He is someone who always imagined that he'd get married one day, and when he decided he wanted that, he acted on it and did it. And he stayed faithful. It isn't always that case that someone with a high body count has an intimacy problem. And those with high body counts don't all keep track of their count. Now that he's divorced in his fifties and still nice looking/fit, he could easily have sex with a new woman monthly.

Yakis - I wouldn’t want to be near with someone who’s built his life around his D and pleasures. Living in a constant search of sex partners .
And he did divorce !

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a guy so I wouldn't date a guy...but wouldn't date a women who has 20 let alone 120 or 140.

Ideally under 7 and I have met women my age where that is the case and they seem to be the more well adjusted ones.

I once dated a women who was like...if we talk about that it's not a constructive conversation. She didn't have to tell me a number I assumed it was high if that's her response. Fair enough she doesn't have to say, but I will judge and I did. I hooked up with her until she got boring and then moved on.

And what’s your number? Under 7?